Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reconstruction from the inertia component

Statement

Let G be finite, NG, and V an irreducible complex G-module whose restriction contains θIrr(N). Set I=IG(θ) and W=Vθ. Then W is irreducible as an I-module, and the canonical map Φ:IndIGWV,ftTtf(t) is a G-isomorphism. Here T is any left transversal for G/I and induction uses functions satisfying f(xi)=i1f(x), with (gf)(x)=f(g1x).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The groups, modules, characters, and hypotheses in the statement. All representations here are finite-dimensional complex left representations.

[F1]

The nonzero component Vθ is stable under IG(θ). (The stabilizer of a nonzero isotypical component).

[F2]

The constituents of the normal restriction of an irreducible module form exactly one conjugacy orbit. (Normal restriction has one orbit of constituents).

[F3]

Evaluation on a finite left transversal identifies the induced function module, as a vector space, with one copy of its inducing module per coset. (A left transversal identifies IndHGW with a direct sum of [G:H] copies of W).

[F4]

For finite G, HomG(IndIGW,V)HomI(W,VI). (Induction is left adjoint to restriction for finite-group modules over a commutative ring).

[F5]

Translation carries each normal isotypical component onto the conjugate-type component, and those components form a direct sum. (Translation permutes normal isotypical components).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The space W is nonzero and I-stable. Its inclusion into VI has a corresponding G-map under adjunction. In the stated function model this map is Φ: replacing t by ti leaves tif(ti)=tf(t) unchanged. For gG, write g1t=ti; then t(gf)(t)=ti1f(t)=gtf(t), so reindexing gives Φ(gf)=gΦ(f).

F1F4givenalgebra
2.1

By transversal evaluation, the functions supported on tI form a copy of W, and Φ restricts there to the invertible linear map wtw onto tW=Vtθ. Distinct left cosets give distinct types, and the orbit result says these are all components of VN. Their sum is direct, so Φ is bijective before any irreducibility of W is asserted.

F2F3F5step 1.1
3.1

Let UW be an I-submodule. The direct sum tTtU is G-stable: if gt=ti then g(tU)=tU. For U0 it is nonzero and hence equals V. Its dimension is [G:I]dimU, whereas step 2.1 gives dimV=[G:I]dimW. Therefore U=W, proving irreducibility. This argument allows T={1} and I=N without change.

step 2.1givenalgebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources