Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The outer Littlewood–Richardson rule

Statement

Let μ⊢m, ν⊢n, and let Sμ, Sν be the complex Specht modules (Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules, Complex Specht modules are irreducible); let Sμ⊠Sν be their external tensor product, a complex Sm×Sn-module (The tensor product of two complex representations). Then, as complex Sm+n-modules,

Ind⁡Sm×SnSm+n(Sμ⊠Sν)≅⨁λ⊢m+n(Sλ)⊕cμνλ,

where cμνλ is the Littlewood–Richardson coefficient, the number of Littlewood–Richardson tableaux of shape λ/μ and content ν (Littlewood--Richardson tableaux and coefficients); equivalently, the character χμ∘χν of the induced module satisfies

ch⁡(χμ∘χν)=sμsν=∑λ⊢m+ncμνλsλ.

The multiplicity of Sλ in the induced module is exactly cμνλ. This is the outer induction product, not the same-rank tensor (Kronecker) product. No choice principle is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Partitions μ⊢m, ν⊢n, and their complex Specht modules.

[F1]

The global convention realizes St on {0,…,t−1}, with composition acting right to left (The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation).

[F2]

Conjugation by a bijection of the underlying sets preserves products and gives a group homomorphism (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism).

[F3]

The outer product is induction of the external product character from the ordered two-block subgroup; it is bilinear, and its external product character has value χ(σ)ψ(τ) (The outer induction product of symmetric-group characters).

[F4]

The induced module consists of covariant functions with F(gh)=h−1⋅F(g) and the left translation action (The induced R-linear G-module Ind⁡HGW as H-covariant functions on G).

[F5]

The character of an induced module is the induced character (The induced character Ind⁡HGχ of a complex character).

[F6]

The Frobenius characteristic is the degreewise linear map ch⁡(f)=∑ρ⊢tf(ρ)pρ/zρ; its values depend only on cycle types (The Frobenius characteristic map).

[F7]

The Frobenius characteristic preserves outer products: ch⁡(f∘g)=ch⁡(f)ch⁡(g) (The Frobenius characteristic preserves outer products).

[F8]

For every integer n≥0 and partition λ⊢n, ch⁡(χλ)=sλ (The characteristic of a Specht character is a Schur function).

[F9]

Schur products expand as sμsν=∑λ⊢m+ncμνλsλ (The Littlewood–Richardson rule for products of Schur functions).

[F10]

The characteristic map is injective on class functions of St (The Frobenius characteristic is an isometry).

[F11]

Finite-dimensional complex representations of a finite group with equal characters are isomorphic (Finite-dimensional complex representations of a finite group are determined up to isomorphism by their characters).

[F12]

Each complex Specht module Sλ is irreducible (Complex Specht modules are irreducible).

[F13]

Distinct partitions label inequivalent Specht modules (Distinct complex Specht modules are inequivalent).

[F14]

The Specht module is the span of the polytabloids in the corresponding tabloid module (Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules).

[F15]

The external tensor product of complex representations is a finite-dimensional complex representation (The tensor product of two complex representations).

[F17]

The coefficient cμνλ is a nonnegative integer counting the stated finite set of tableaux (Littlewood--Richardson tableaux and coefficients).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3F4F6F14construct

For each t, the label shift βt(i)=i+1 (empty if t=0) gives the group isomorphism ct(σ)=βtσβt−1 from zero-based to one-based permutations. It preserves products, cycle types and the ordered block embeddings. For a one-based subgroup H1 and module W, put H0=cm+n−1(H1) and h⋅0w=cm+n(h)⋅1w. Pullback of induced functions is F0(g)=F1(cm+n(g)), with inverse composition by cm+n−1; it satisfies F0(gh)=h−1⋅0F0(g) and intertwines left translation because cm+n preserves products. Relabeling tableaux by the same shift identifies tabloids, conjugates their column stabilizers and preserves signs, hence identifies the Specht actions in [F14]. Cycle-type preservation leaves [F6] unchanged. Thus the character and induction formulas use compatible group conventions.

1.2F6F7F8F9algebra

By [F7] and [F8], ch⁡(χμ∘χν)=ch⁡(χμ)ch⁡(χν)=sμsν. Applying the Schur expansion [F9] and the linearity of ch⁡ in [F6] gives ch⁡(χμ∘χν)=∑λ⊢m+ncμνλch⁡(χλ)=ch⁡(∑λ⊢m+ncμνλχλ). The sum is finite by [F9].

2.1F10step 1.2

The two class functions inside ch⁡ in step 1.2 have the same characteristic. Injectivity [F10] therefore gives χμ∘χν=∑λ⊢m+ncμνλχλ as class functions on Sm+n.

3.1F3F4F5F9F11F14F15F16F17step 2.1given

Let V=Ind⁡Sm×SnSm+n(Sμ⊠Sν) and W=⨁λ⊢m+n(Sλ)⊕cμνλ. These are finite-dimensional complex representations: each Specht module is spanned by finitely many polytabloids by [F14], their external tensor product is finite-dimensional by [F15], the sum has finite support by [F9], and the covariant induction space [F4] is a subspace of the finite-dimensional function space from the finite group Sm+n to Sμ⊗Sν. The character of V is χμ∘χν by [F3, F5]; the character of W is ∑λcμνλχλ by additivity [F16]. Step 2.1 makes these characters equal, so [F11] gives V≅W.

4.1F3F12F13F17step 3.1∎

By [F12, F13], the summands Sλ in W are pairwise inequivalent irreducible modules, and the direct sum in step 3.1 contains exactly cμνλ copies of each one. Thus this is the multiplicity of Sλ in the induced module as well. The conclusion uses the outer induction product defined in [F3], not a tensor product of two modules for the same symmetric group; every relabeling and sum is explicit and finite, so no form of the axiom of choice is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

78 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources