How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules
Definition
Let , let , and let be a -tableau (Partitions, English diagrams, and conjugation, Tableaux and standard tableaux). Use the left action of on tableaux, tabloids, and (Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules). For each , let be its inversion sign in . The order-preserving relabelling , , carries each inversion pair bijectively to ; thus this sign is exactly the published inversion sign on the finite ordinal (Inversions, inversion number, the sign , and even and odd permutations). For , both groups are trivial and the sign is .
The column antisymmetrizer, polytabloid, and Specht space are The elements of the sum are in the finite subgroup , and each acts by the declared left action on the tabloid basis, so these are well-defined finite expressions.
For every tableau, : a permutation in both stabilizers preserves the row and column of each entry, and each row-column intersection contains at most one node. Thus are distinct as ranges over , and the coefficient of in is . In particular, . When , the empty tableau has , so , , and .
Depends on
Used by
- Distinct complex Specht modules are inequivalent Corollary
- A reducible Specht module in characteristic two Counterexample
- All three Specht modules of S₃ Example
- Polytabloids of shape (2,1) Example
- The row and column Specht modules Example
- Adjacent-column Garnir relation over C Lemma
- Column collision cancels antisymmetrization Lemma
- Complex Specht modules have nondegenerate Hermitian self-pairing Lemma
- Garnir straightening spans the complex Specht module Lemma
- Leading tabloid of a column-standard polytabloid Lemma
- Nonzero antisymmetrizer image detects dominance Lemma
- Polytabloid covariance and the column sign rule Lemma
- The antisymmetrizer image in its own tabloid module is one-dimensional Lemma
- Complex Specht modules are irreducible Theorem
- Homomorphisms from Specht to Young permutation modules obey dominance Theorem
- James's submodule theorem over the complex numbers Theorem
- Standard polytabloids form a basis of a complex Specht module Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charlotte Chan, Representation Theory of Symmetric Groups, Chapter 3, Definition 3.8, printed p. 12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David A. Craven, Groups, Geometries and Representation Theory, Sections 1.8 and 2.1, printed pp. 16-22 (standard reference, not scraped)