Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Column collision cancels antisymmetrization

Statement

Let t have shape λ and let {s} be a μ-tabloid of the same n. If two entries a,b lie in one row of s and in one column of t, then κt⋅{s}=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥0, partitions λ,μ⊢n, a λ-tableau t, a μ-tabloid {s}, and distinct labels a,b lying in one row of s and one column of t.

[F1]

The row stabilizer preserves each row set, and the column stabilizer preserves each column set (Row and column stabilizers).

[F2]

A tabloid records row sets, so the order of entries within each row is forgotten (Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules).

[F3]

The column antisymmetrizer is κt=∑γ∈Ctsgn⁡(γ)γ (Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules).

[F6]

The library's 1,…,n sign convention is transported by the canonical relabelling from the finite-ordinal convention (Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2construct

Put τ=(a b). Since a,b are in the same column of t, τ preserves every column set and lies in Ct by [F1]. Since they are in the same row of s, it preserves every row set of s; therefore τ⋅{s}={s} by [F1,F2].

1.2givenF3F4F5F6constructalgebra

The labels a,b are distinct, so n≥2. The canonical relabelling in [F6] preserves order and inversion number. If a<b, the one-line permutation for τ=(a b) has one inversion from (a,b) and two inversions for each intermediate label, so its inversion number is 1+2(b−a−1)=2(b−a)−1, which is odd. Thus sgn⁡(τ)=−1 by [F5]. Order permutations by one-line notation and take the least element in each right coset g⟨τ⟩ of Ct. These canonical representatives partition Ct into pairs g,gτ, whence κt=∑g(sgn⁡(g)g+sgn⁡(gτ)gτ)=∑gsgn⁡(g)g(1−τ) by [F3,F4]. The least representative is uniquely defined in each finite coset, so no choice principle is used.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

Applying the last expression to {s}, every term is zero because (1−τ)⋅{s}={s}−{s}=0 by step 1.1. Thus κt⋅{s}=0, as claimed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources