How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
James's submodule theorem over the complex numbers
Statement
For every , partition , and -submodule , either where orthogonality is for the invariant positive definite Hermitian tabloid product.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and an -submodule .
The tabloids form a basis of , and the -action extends linearly from the tabloid action (Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules).
An -submodule is a linear subspace stable under each element of (Subrepresentations, direct sums of representations, and irreducibility).
The column antisymmetrizer, polytabloid, and Specht space are
for each -tableau (Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules).
For every , and (The antisymmetrizer image in its own tabloid module is one-dimensional).
The Specht space is generated as an -module by any one polytabloid (Polytabloid covariance and the column sign rule).
The tabloid product is conjugate-linear in its first argument and linear in its second (Invariant Hermitian product on a tabloid module).
Each is self-adjoint for the tabloid product (Invariant Hermitian product on a tabloid module).
This Hermitian product is positive definite: if , then (Invariant Hermitian product on a tabloid module).
The orthogonal complement is (Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement).
Every shape has a canonical standard row-filled tableau ; for it is the empty tableau (Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules).
No form of the Axiom of Choice is used. The first branch uses only witnesses to one existential statement, and all group-algebra sums are finite.
Proof
If for some and -tableau , then [F4] gives with ; by [F1]-[F3] the finite group-algebra sum lies in , so division gives .
Otherwise for every and every ; self-adjointness in [F7] and from [F3] give .
By [F5], the polytabloid from step 1.1 generates under ; stability of from [F2] and step 1.1 therefore give .
Since the span by [F3] and the product is linear in its second argument by [F6], step 1.2 gives for every and ; by [F9], .
The cases “some ” and “all ” are exhaustive; if both conclusions held, , so the nonzero canonical from [F3], [F4], [F10] would satisfy by [F9], contradicting [F8]. Thus exactly one alternative holds.
Depends on
- Invariant Hermitian product on a tabloid module
- The antisymmetrizer image in its own tabloid module is one-dimensional
- Polytabloid covariance and the column sign rule
- Column antisymmetrizers, polytabloids, and Specht modules
- Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement
- Subrepresentations, direct sums of representations, and irreducibility
- Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.