Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite supersolvable groups are M-groups

Statement

Let G be a finite group together with a series 1=G0◃G1◃⋯◃Gr=G whose terms are normal in G and whose factors Gi/Gi−1 have prime order; this is the supersolvable convention of (Supersolvable groups and monomial characters). Then G is an M-group: every irreducible finite-dimensional complex representation of G is isomorphic to Ind⁡HGλ for some subgroup H≤G and some linear character λ of H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G with a series 1=G0◃G1◃⋯◃Gr=G of subgroups Gi⊴G with Gi/Gi−1 of prime order for 1≤i≤r, and an irreducible finite-dimensional complex representation ρ:G→GL⁡(V) with kernel K=ker⁡ρ.

[F1]

G is an M-group when every irreducible complex representation is monomial, that is isomorphic to Ind⁡HGL for a subgroup H≤G and a one-dimensional H-module L; characters of induced modules are induced characters. (Monomial representations, monomial characters, and M-groups).

[F2]

The hypothesis is exactly the supersolvable convention: a normal series in G with prime-order factors. (Supersolvable groups and monomial characters).

[F3]

A group with a series whose terms are normal in the whole group and whose factors have prime order has an abelian normal subgroup not contained in its center whenever it is nonabelian, and the same holds for its nonabelian quotients. (A nonabelian supersolvable group has a noncentral abelian normal subgroup, also in its nonabelian quotients).

[F4]

If A⊴G is abelian with A⊈Z(G) and V is a faithful irreducible complex G-representation, then for every constituent λ of the restriction of V to A the inertia group IG(λ) is proper in G and V≅Ind⁡IG(λ)GW for an irreducible IG(λ)-module W lying over λ. (A faithful irreducible with a noncentral abelian normal subgroup is induced from a proper inertia group).

[F5]

If K⊴G, K≤H≤G and W is a finite-dimensional complex H/K-module, then Infl⁡G/KG(Ind⁡H/KG/KW)≅Ind⁡HG(Infl⁡H/KHW); in particular the inflation of a monomial irreducible is monomial, and it is irreducible. (Induction commutes with inflation along a normal subgroup).

[F6]

Induction is transitive: Ind⁡HG(Ind⁡LHW)≅Ind⁡LGW for L≤H≤G. (Induction is transitive along subgroup chains).

[F7]

Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field has degree one, and C is a splitting field for every finite group. (Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field is one-dimensional, A cyclotomic field splits a finite group).

[F8]

A representation with kernel containing a normal subgroup N factors through G/N, and irreducibility is preserved in both directions. (A representation with kernel containing a normal subgroup factors through the quotient, and irreducibility is unchanged by inflation).

[F9]

Ind⁡HGW={ f:G→W:f(gh)=h−1⋅f(g) for all g∈G,h∈H } with (x⋅f)(g)=f(x−1g); in particular, for H=G every f is determined by f(1), and the map L→Ind⁡GGL, w↦(g↦g−1⋅w), is a G-isomorphism. (The induced R-linear G-module Ind⁡HGW as H-covariant functions on G).

[F11]

For a homomorphism of groups the induced map on the quotient by its kernel is an isomorphism onto the image. (First isomorphism theorem for groups: G/ker⁡f≅im⁡f).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

We prove the assertion by induction on ∣G∣. If ∣G∣=1 then V is the one-dimensional trivial representation, and [F9] with H=G=1 shows that V is induced from a linear character of the subgroup G itself, so V is monomial; this is the base case. In the remaining cases G is nontrivial, V is a fixed irreducible complex G-representation, and K=ker⁡ρ is its kernel.

F1F9givenbase
1.2

Induction hypothesis: every finite group H with ∣H∣<∣G∣ that is supersolvable in the sense of [F2], that is, possesses a series with terms normal in H and prime-order factors, has the property that each of its irreducible complex representations is induced from a linear character of a subgroup.

F2ih
1.3

Suppose next that K=1 and that G is abelian. By [F7] the irreducible representation V over the splitting field C is one-dimensional, so its representing map is a linear character of G; by [F9] with H=G the module V is isomorphic to Ind⁡GGV, hence is induced from a linear character of the subgroup G. So V is monomial in this case as well.

F1F7F9given
2.1

Suppose first that K≠1. Then K acts trivially on V, so by [F8] the representation descends to an irreducible representation ρˉ of Gˉ=G/K on V, that is V=Infl⁡GˉGVˉ for the irreducible Gˉ-module Vˉ affording ρˉ. The images Gˉi:=GiK/K form a chain of subgroups normal in Gˉ with Gˉ0=1 and Gˉr=Gˉ, and each Gˉi/Gˉi−1 is a quotient of the prime-order group Gi/Gi−1: the map gK↦gGi−1K from GiK/K onto GiK/Gi−1K has kernel Gi−1K/K and is surjective, so by [F11] Gˉi/Gˉi−1≅GiK/Gi−1K, and the latter is a quotient of Gi/Gi−1 since the natural map Gi→GiK/Gi−1K is onto with Gi−1 in its kernel. Hence Gˉ satisfies the hypothesis of the theorem with ∣Gˉ∣<∣G∣, and by step 1.2 there are Hˉ≤Gˉ and a one-dimensional Hˉ-module Lˉ with Vˉ≅Ind⁡HˉGˉLˉ. Writing H=π−1(Hˉ) for the quotient map π:G→Gˉ, the final clause of [F5] gives V=Infl⁡GˉGVˉ≅Ind⁡HG(Infl⁡HˉHLˉ) with Infl⁡HˉHLˉ one-dimensional. So V is monomial in this case.

F5F8F11step 1.2given
2.2

There remains the case K=1 with G nonabelian, which by step 1.3 exhausts the remaining possibilities. Then ρ is faithful by [F10], so [F3] applied to G gives an abelian normal subgroup A⊴G with A⊈Z(G). Restricting V to the abelian group A and using [F7], the module V∣A has a constituent λ, which is a linear character of A; applying [F4] to A and V shows that I:=IG(λ) is a proper subgroup of G and that V≅Ind⁡IGW for an irreducible I-module W lying over λ. In particular ∣I∣<∣G∣.

F3F4F7F10step 1.3given
3.1

The intersection Ij:=I∩Gj is normal in I for each j, since Gj⊴G, and the map I∩Gj→Gj/Gj−1, x↦xGj−1, has kernel Ij−1, so Ij/Ij−1 is isomorphic to a subgroup of the prime-order group Gj/Gj−1 and therefore has order 1 or prime; deleting repeated terms gives a series for I whose terms are normal in I and whose factors have prime order. Since ∣I∣<∣G∣ by step 2.2, the induction hypothesis of step 1.2 applied to I gives W≅Ind⁡LIμ for some subgroup L≤I and some linear character μ of L.

F11step 1.2step 2.2given
4.1

Combining steps 2.2 and 3.1 with transitivity of induction [F6], V≅Ind⁡IGInd⁡LIμ≅Ind⁡LGμ with μ a linear character of L, so V is monomial. The cases ∣G∣=1 (step 1.1), K≠1 (step 2.1), K=1 with G abelian (step 1.3) and K=1 with G nonabelian (steps 2.2 and 3.1) are exhaustive, so every irreducible complex representation of G is induced from a linear character of a subgroup and G is an M-group by [F1].

F1F6step 1.1step 2.1step 1.3step 2.2step 3.1discharge-induction: step 1.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources