How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Criterion for an invariant quotient measure
Statement
Assume AC. The quotient has a nonzero -invariant Radon measure if and only if . When they agree, in the Weil formula supplies such a measure.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: LCH , closed , fixed left Haar measures, and AC.
The averaging map is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
Positive functionals on have Radon representing measures, and Radon measures are determined by their integrals (Positive functionals on C_c(X) are integration against a Radon measure, Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).
Any two left Haar measures are positive scalar multiples (Uniqueness of left Haar measure up to scale).
Right translation by scales a left Haar integral by (Right translation scales left Haar measure).
is a rho-function exactly when ; its Weil measure satisfies the quotient formula (Rho-function for a closed subgroup, Weil formula with a rho-function).
AC implies DC as required by the cited measure results (AC implies DC implies countable choice).
AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Assume is a nonzero invariant Radon measure on . Define for real . This functional is positive. If it were zero, surjectivity [F1] would make every integral against zero, and [F2] would force . Thus is nonzero.
Conversely suppose the modular functions agree on . Then satisfies the covariance in [F5]. Let be the Weil measure. For and , its translate satisfies by left invariance.
For , let . Then , so invariance of gives . By [F2], is represented by a Radon measure on ; it is left invariant and nonzero, hence a left Haar measure.
By [F3], for . For , right translation gives by [F4] applied in . Hence . Since , [F4] applied in also gives . Choose with ; equality forces .
Surjectivity [F1] gives this equality for every test function. The Radon uniqueness in [F2] shows ; the Weil measure is nonzero. This proves sufficiency and the equivalence. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1, Corollary B.1.7, PDF pp. 355–356; Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapter 7 §3.3, Proposition 3, PDF pp. 74–75. Full relevant text was inspected.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Rho-function for a closed subgroup
- Weil formula with a rho-function
- Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)
- Right translation scales left Haar measure
- Uniqueness of left Haar measure up to scale
- Positive functionals on C_c(X) are integration against a Radon measure
- Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendices B and E (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapters 1 and 7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Vogan, Unitary Representations of Locally Compact Groups and Induced Representations (standard reference, not scraped)