How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Unitary induction from a closed subgroup
Statement
Assume AC. For every closed and strongly continuous unitary representation on a Hilbert space , the completion of covariant compact-coset-support functions with the rho quotient norm and cocycle-corrected left action is a strongly continuous unitary -representation . If it identifies with ; if , one may normalize so the quotient measure is left Haar and identify the model with carrying , ; for this is the scalar left regular representation. If is invariant the cocycle is one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, closed , and a strongly continuous unitary of .
A rho-function and full-support strongly quasi-invariant Radon measure exist (Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes).
The covariant function model and completion are defined (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).
The integrated inner product is positive definite (Well-defined induced inner product).
The cocycle-corrected action is unitary (Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).
The action is strongly continuous (Strong continuity of unitary induction).
The density derivative and its cocycle identity are given by the homogeneous-measure cocycle lemma (Continuous quotient translation cocycle).
For , the quotient formula identifies the measure with Haar measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).
AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Choose and by [F1] under [A1]. The covariance equations make the pointwise inner product a well-defined positive form by [F2,F3]. Its completion is a Hilbert space.
The formula preserves the dense covariant model and is a unitary representation by [F4]. The strong continuity lemma [F5] extends this property to every completed vector. This gives .
If , then is a singleton and every covariant section is determined by , with . Rescale by a positive constant so the quotient point has measure one; evaluation at is then an isometry, and the action becomes . If , put and choose the constant rho-function . The Weil formula [F6] then gives , so the model completes from to . The action is , namely ; for this is the scalar left regular representation. If is invariant, then ; the continuous density is therefore one everywhere by full support, so the action has no cocycle factor. These are the three stated reductions. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Definition E.1.6 and Remark E.1.7, PDF pp. 412–414; Vogan, On the Definition of Induced Representations, §§1–4. Complete relevant text was inspected.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes
- Continuous covariant model and measurable completion
- Well-defined induced inner product
- Density of averaged covariant generators
- Unitary cocycle-corrected left action
- Strong continuity of unitary induction
- Weil formula with a rho-function
- Continuous quotient translation cocycle
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendices B and E (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapters 1 and 7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Vogan, Unitary Representations of Locally Compact Groups and Induced Representations (standard reference, not scraped)