How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Independence of rho and equivalent quotient representative
Statement
Assume AC. Two rho-functions with their Weil measures give unitarily equivalent induced representations by . More generally, an equivalent quasi-invariant Radon representative gives the same completed measurable-section representation via its positive local density and translated Radon–Nikodym cocycle.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the induced model and action, two rho-functions and Weil measures, or an equivalent quasi-invariant Radon measure .
The Weil formula and uniqueness identify each quotient measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).
Covariant sections use the quotient norm and cocycle action (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion, Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).
Equivalent Radon measures have positive finite local densities and componentwise unitary multiplication maps (Local densities for equivalent Radon quotient measures).
The rho-derived density is (Continuous quotient translation cocycle).
The quotient averaging map is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
Radon measures agreeing on agree on Borel sets (Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).
AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Put for . The rho covariance makes this ratio independent of representative and positive continuous. If , the two Weil formulas give The measure is Radon because is positive continuous and bounded on compact sets. Surjectivity of gives equality of its integrals with those of , and [F6] identifies .
Define . The ratio is -invariant, so covariance is preserved, and step 1.1 gives The inverse multiplier is , hence extends onto the Hilbert completions.
For the action, both sides of multiply by the same scalar: which follows by substituting into [F4]. Thus the rho choices give equivalent representations.
For an equivalent quasi-invariant , [F3] supplies local densities on each open sigma-compact component. Multiplication by is a unitary from the section space to the section space, since . On each open -compact target component, maps it to an open -compact set meeting only countably many components, so the componentwise densities are measurable there. Pushing forward under gives the local Radon--Nikodym derivative almost everywhere on that component. The componentwise multiplication maps assemble on the Hilbert direct sum, and substitution in the action formula gives almost everywhere. Thus the general measure representative gives the same unitary representation. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1 Theorem B.1.4(iii) and Appendix E §E.1 Proposition E.1.5, PDF pp. 353–355 and 414–415. Full relevant text was inspected; local density handling is expanded here for non--finite quotients.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Unitary induction from a closed subgroup
- Continuous covariant model and measurable completion
- Unitary cocycle-corrected left action
- Local densities for equivalent Radon quotient measures
- Continuous quotient translation cocycle
- Weil formula with a rho-function
- Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)
- Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendices B and E (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapters 1 and 7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Vogan, Unitary Representations of Locally Compact Groups and Induced Representations (standard reference, not scraped)