Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Independence of rho and equivalent quotient representative

Statement

Assume AC. Two rho-functions ρ1,ρ2 with their Weil measures give unitarily equivalent induced representations by U(F)(x)=[ρ1(x)/ρ2(x)]1/2F(x). More generally, an equivalent quasi-invariant Radon representative ν gives the same completed measurable-section representation via its positive local density and translated Radon–Nikodym cocycle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the induced model and action, two rho-functions and Weil measures, or an equivalent quasi-invariant Radon measure ν.

[F1]

The Weil formula and uniqueness identify each quotient measure (Weil formula with a rho-function).

[F2]

Covariant sections use the quotient norm and cocycle action (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion, Unitary cocycle-corrected left action).

[F3]

Equivalent Radon measures have positive finite local densities and componentwise unitary multiplication maps (Local densities for equivalent Radon quotient measures).

[F4]

The rho-derived density is Dg(q)=ρ(g−1x)/ρ(x) (Continuous quotient translation cocycle).

[F5]

The quotient averaging map TH is onto Cc(G/H) (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F6]

Radon measures agreeing on Cc(G/H) agree on Borel sets (Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).

[A1]

AC is the choice-function principle required by the stated hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F5F6A1

Put a(q)=ρ2(x)/ρ1(x) for q=xH. The rho covariance makes this ratio independent of representative and positive continuous. If ϕ=THf, the two Weil formulas give ∫Xϕ dμρ2=∫Gfρ2dx=∫Gfρ1a dx=∫Xϕ(q)a(q) dμρ1(q). The measure aμρ1 is Radon because a is positive continuous and bounded on compact sets. Surjectivity of TH gives equality of its Cc integrals with those of μρ2, and [F6] identifies dμρ2=a dμρ1.

2.1F2step 1.1

Define U(F)=a−1/2F=[ρ1/ρ2]1/2F. The ratio is H-invariant, so covariance is preserved, and step 1.1 gives ∥UF∥ρ22=∫Xa−1∥F∥2dμρ2=∥F∥ρ12. The inverse multiplier is a1/2, hence U extends onto the Hilbert completions.

2.2F2F4step 1.1

For the action, both sides of UΠ1(g)F=Π2(g)UF multiply F(g−1x) by the same scalar: a(xH)−1/2Dg1(xH)1/2=Dg2(xH)1/2a(g−1xH)−1/2, which follows by substituting a=ρ2/ρ1 into [F4]. Thus the rho choices give equivalent representations.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2

For an equivalent quasi-invariant ν, [F3] supplies local densities w=dν/dμρ>0 on each open sigma-compact component. Multiplication by w−1/2 is a unitary from the μρ section space to the ν section space, since dν=w dμρ. On each open σ-compact target component, g−1 maps it to an open σ-compact set meeting only countably many components, so the componentwise densities are measurable there. Pushing wμρ forward under q↦gq gives the local Radon--Nikodym derivative Dgν(q)=w(g−1q)w(q)Dgρ(q) almost everywhere on that component. The componentwise multiplication maps assemble on the Hilbert direct sum, and substitution in the action formula gives UΠρ(g)=Πν(g)U almost everywhere. Thus the general measure representative gives the same unitary representation. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix B §B.1 Theorem B.1.4(iii) and Appendix E §E.1 Proposition E.1.5, PDF pp. 353–355 and 414–415. Full relevant text was inspected; local density handling is expanded here for non-σ-finite quotients.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources