Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Density of averaged covariant generators

Statement

Assume AC. For f∈Cc(G) and v∈V, the section ξf,v(x)=∫Hf(xh)σ(h)v dh belongs to Cc(G,H;V). Their finite linear span is uniformly dense on compact quotient supports in Cc(G,H;V), and the Hilbert completion equals the locally strongly measurable covariant L2 sections modulo μρ-almost-everywhere equality.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, closed H≤G, a strongly continuous unitary σ on V, and the rho-derived quotient measure.

[F1]

Covariant sections and their quotient norm are defined in the induced model (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).

[F2]

Their integrated inner product is positive definite, and the measure has full support (Well-defined induced inner product).

[F3]

The averaging map is onto with nonnegative lifts, compact quotient sets have compact lifts, and compact subsets of an open set admit compactly supported cutoffs (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H), LCH Urysohn cutoff).

[F4]

A finite open cover near a compact set admits a subordinate compactly supported partition of unity under DC (A finite compactly supported partition of unity near a compact set).

[F5]

Cc is dense in L2 for Radon measures under DC (C_c(X) is dense in L^p(mu) for a Radon measure).

[F6]

Strong measurability and integrability of the norm imply Bochner integrability (Bochner integrability criterion).

[F8]

The Weil formula holds for Cc(G), and Radon measures agreeing on Cc agree on Borel sets (Weil formula with a rho-function, Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).

[A1]

AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3F6construct

For fixed x, the integrand defining ξf,v is supported on the compact set x−1supp⁡f∩H, so the Bochner integral exists. Replacing x by xh0 and substituting k=h0h gives ξf,v(xh0)=σ(h0)−1ξf,v(x). For a relatively compact neighborhood N of a fixed x0, every contributing h lies in the compact set K=N‾−1supp⁡f∩H. The integrand (x,h)↦f(xh)σ(h)v is jointly continuous on a compact neighborhood times K, so its uniform variation in h tends to zero as x→x0; the integral therefore varies continuously. Its quotient support lies in p(supp⁡f), which is compact. Thus ξf,v∈Cc(G,H;V).

1.2A1F3F5F6F7F8choose

Now let F be a locally strongly measurable covariant section with finite quotient L2 norm. By [F5] choose ψ∈Cc(G/H) close in scalar L2 to q↦∥F(q)∥; outside Q=supp⁡ψ the L2 tail of F is therefore small. Put FQ=1QF and choose a cutoff χ∈Cc(G/H) with χ=1 on Q by [F3], then choose a nonnegative lift u0∈Cc(G) with THu0=χ by [F3]. The measurable map U=u0FQ is supported in a compact subset of G. For ϕ∈Cc(G/H), apply the Weil formula [F8] to f(y)=(ϕ∘p)(y)∣u0(y)∣2. It identifies the finite Radon measures B↦∫p−1(B)∣u0(y)∣2ρ(y) dy and B↦∫BTH(∣u0∣2)(q) dμρ(q), first on Cc(G/H) and then on Borel sets by [F8]. Integrating q↦∥FQ(q)∥2 gives ∫G∥U(x)∥2ρ(x) dx=∫Q∥F(q)∥2TH(∣u0∣2)(q) dμρ(q)<∞. On its compact support ρ dx is finite, so [F6] makes U Bochner square integrable.

2.1F1F2F3F4A1step 1.1chooseconstruct

Let F∈Cc(G,H;V) and K=supp⁡G/HF. Choose a cutoff χ∈Cc(G/H) with χ=1 on K by [F3], then a nonnegative lift u0∈Cc(G) with THu0=χ by [F3]. The map u0F is continuous and compactly supported on G. Cover its compact support by finitely many open sets on which F varies by less than ϵ in norm; [F4] supplies a subordinate partition θj. For chosen vj from each patch, u0F is uniformly within ∥u0∥∞ϵ of ∑j(u0θj)vj. Averaging the latter gives a finite sum of generators. The averaging error is bounded uniformly on the compact quotient support because, after choosing a compact lift C of that support, all relevant h lie in the fixed compact set C−1supp⁡u0∩H, of finite Haar measure. Since A(u0F)=THu0 F=F on K and both vanish off K, the generators approximate F uniformly.

3.1F1F3F5F6F8step 1.2chooseconstruct

Strong measurability approximates U by finite-valued simple maps; scalar Cc density [F5] approximates their coefficients in L2(G,ρ dx). Multiplying by one fixed compactly supported cutoff equal to one on supp⁡U makes all approximants supported in a common compact C. The averaging operator A(W)(x)=∫Hσ(h)W(xh) dh is bounded on continuous maps supported in C. If C=∅ then W=0 and the bound is immediate. Otherwise choose a compact lift C0 of p(C) and let m=dh(C0−1C∩H)<∞. For each q∈p(C) choose a representative x∈C0. Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∥A(W)(x)∥2≤m TH(∥W∥2)(q). Integrating over G/H and applying [F8] to ∥W∥2∈Cc(G) yields ∥A(W)∥22≤m∫G∥W(y)∥2ρ(y) dy=m∥W∥L2(G,ρ dy)2. Therefore averages of the finite-sum Cc(G,V) approximants converge to A(U)=FQ. Each average is a finite sum of the generators in step 1.1. Letting the discarded tail tend to zero proves density in the full measurable L2 space. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Proposition E.1.1 and Lemma E.1.3, PDF pp. 411–414. Full text was inspected; the vector-valued approximation and the compact-fiber bound are supplied explicitly here.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources