Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Well-defined induced inner product

Statement

Assume AC. For F1,F2∈Cc(G,H;V), q=xH↦⟨F1(x),F2(x)⟩ is independent of x, continuous, and compactly supported. Its μρ integral is a positive-definite inner product; the norm vanishes only when F=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Strongly continuous unitary σ, rho-derived measure μρ, and F1,F2∈Cc(G,H;V).

[A1]

AC is assumed as stated (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Covariant sections satisfy F(xh)=σ(h)−1F(x) (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).

[F2]

The representation σ in the induced model is unitary on V (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).

[F3]

The quotient map is open and G/H is LCH (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F4]

The rho-derived Radon measure has full support (Weil formula with a rho-function).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3A1

For h∈H, covariance and unitarity give ⟨F1(xh),F2(xh)⟩=⟨σ(h)−1F1(x),σ(h)−1F2(x)⟩=⟨F1(x),F2(x)⟩. Thus the scalar is independent of the representative. Its continuous lift to G descends continuously because the quotient map is open; its support lies in the intersection of the compact quotient supports.

2.1A1F4step 1.1algebra

Radon finiteness on that compact support makes the integral finite. For F1=F2=F, the integral is nonnegative. If it were zero but F were nonzero at some x, continuity would make ∥F∥2 positive on a nonempty open subset of G/H, which has positive measure by full support [F4], a contradiction. Hence the norm is positive definite; integrating the pointwise sesquilinear form gives the asserted inner product. ∎

Sources

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Definition E.1.6, PDF pp. 412–413. Full relevant text was inspected.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources