How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Well-defined induced inner product
Statement
Assume AC. For , is independent of , continuous, and compactly supported. Its integral is a positive-definite inner product; the norm vanishes only when .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Strongly continuous unitary , rho-derived measure , and .
AC is assumed as stated (The Axiom of Choice).
Covariant sections satisfy (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).
The representation in the induced model is unitary on (Continuous covariant model and measurable completion).
The quotient map is open and is LCH (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).
The rho-derived Radon measure has full support (Weil formula with a rho-function).
Proof
For , covariance and unitarity give Thus the scalar is independent of the representative. Its continuous lift to descends continuously because the quotient map is open; its support lies in the intersection of the compact quotient supports.
Radon finiteness on that compact support makes the integral finite. For , the integral is nonnegative. If it were zero but were nonzero at some , continuity would make positive on a nonempty open subset of , which has positive measure by full support [F4], a contradiction. Hence the norm is positive definite; integrating the pointwise sesquilinear form gives the asserted inner product. ∎
Sources
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendix E §E.1, Definition E.1.6, PDF pp. 412–413. Full relevant text was inspected.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette, Kazhdan’s Property (T), Appendices B and E (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bruhat, Lectures on Lie Groups and Representations of Locally Compact Groups, Chapters 1 and 7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Vogan, Unitary Representations of Locally Compact Groups and Induced Representations (standard reference, not scraped)