Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bruhat cutoff normalized along H-fibers

Statement

Assume AC. For closed H≤G there is a continuous β:G→[0,∞) with ∫Hβ(xh) dh=1 for every x, and for every compact Q⊆G/H the part of supp⁡β lying over Q is compact. In particular, each H-fiber meets supp⁡β in a compact set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A locally compact Hausdorff group G, a closed subgroup H, fixed left Haar measure on H, and AC.

[F1]

AC implies DC and countable choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F2]

X=G/H is LCH, the quotient map is open, compact quotient sets have compact lifts, and TH:Cc(G)→Cc(X) is onto (Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F3]

Every regular Lindelöf space is paracompact under countable choice (Under countable choice, every regular Lindelöf space is paracompact).

[F4]

A paracompact Hausdorff space has a locally finite partition of unity subordinate to any open cover under AC and DC (Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity).

[F5]

Compact sets inside open subsets of an LCH space admit compactly supported continuous cutoffs under DC (LCH Urysohn cutoff).

[A1]

AC means every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · construction
1.1F1F2construct

Choose a relatively compact symmetric open identity neighborhood U in G and let L=⋃n≥1Un. Then L is an open subgroup and is σ-compact, since L=⋃n(U‾)n. Its orbits on X are open and disjoint; each is a continuous image of L, hence σ-compact. As an open subspace of the LCH space X, each orbit is regular and Lindelöf. By [F1] and [F3], every orbit is paracompact, and their topological sum X is paracompact.

1.2F2F4F5chooseconstruct

Cover X by relatively compact open sets. By [F4] choose a locally finite partition of unity (ψi) subordinate to this cover; each supp⁡ψi is compact. Use [F5] to choose χi∈Cc(X) with χi=1 on supp⁡ψi, and [F2] to choose a nonnegative ui∈Cc(G) with THui=χi. Define bi=(ψi∘p)ui. It is continuous, nonnegative and compactly supported, and THbi=ψiχi=ψi.

2.1A1F1F2F3F4F5step 1.1step 1.2

Set β=∑ibi. Since (ψi) is locally finite and p is continuous, the sum is locally finite on G, hence continuous and nonnegative. Fiber integration gives THβ=∑iψi=1. For compact Q⊆X, only finitely many supp⁡ψi meet Q; the support of β over Q is contained in the finite union of the compact sets supp⁡ui∩p−1(Q). Thus it is compact. AC supplies the choices, and the construction applies to non-σ-compact X because it uses the open L-orbits from step 1.1. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources