Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Volume doubling under a nonnegative ricci lower bound

Statement

Assume the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice ACω. Let (M,g) be a complete, connected, boundaryless Riemannian manifold of dimension n≥2 with Ric⁡≥(n−1)k g for a real number k, let p∈M, and let Vk⋆ be the saturated model ball volume of Model space radial area and ball volume. Then for every r>0, vol⁡g(B(p,2r))≤Vk⋆(2r)Vk⋆(r)  vol⁡g(B(p,r)), so the ball volume is doubled at the cost of the explicit model factor. When k=0 this factor is exactly V0⋆(2r)V0⋆(r)=2n, while for k<0 it is the scale-dependent model ratio Vk⋆(2r)Vk⋆(r)=∫02rsinh⁡n−1(−k t) dt∫0rsinh⁡n−1(−k t) dt, a function of the product −k r alone; no uniform bound independent of r is asserted for k<0. For k>0 each model volume is saturated once its own radius reaches the model pole, so the factor is ∫0min⁡{2r,π/k}sn⁡kn−1/∫0min⁡{r,π/k}sn⁡kn−1. No compactness of M is assumed, and no choice beyond the inherited ACω is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The inherited ACω of [A1]; a complete, connected, boundaryless Riemannian manifold (M,g) of dimension n≥2 with Ric⁡≥(n−1)k g; a point p∈M; the ball volumes vol⁡g(B(p,⋅)); and the saturated model volume Vk⋆.

[A1]

The countable-choice premise is the inherited ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), carried by the Bishop–Gromov and change-of-variables suppliers below.

[F1]

Bishop–Gromov volume comparison (Bishop gromov volume comparison): the ratio Rp(r)=vol⁡g(B(p,r))/Vk⋆(r) is well defined, nonincreasing on (0,∞), tends to 1 as r↓0, and satisfies vol⁡g(B(p,r))≤Vk⋆(r)<+∞ for every r>0.

[F2]

Model volume (Model space radial area and ball volume, Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions): Vk⋆(r)=Vk(min⁡{r,π/k})=ωn−1∫0min⁡{r,π/k}sn⁡k(t)n−1 dt for k>0 and Vk⋆(r)=Vk(r)=ωn−1∫0rsn⁡k(t)n−1 dt for k≤0, where ωn−1>0; moreover sn⁡0(t)=t and, for k<0, sn⁡k(t)n−1=sinh⁡n−1(−k t)(−k)n−1,Vk(r)=ωn−1(−k)n−1∫0rsinh⁡n−1(−k t) dt.

[F3]

Change of variables (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions): for a C1 diffeomorphism T:U→V of open subsets of R and every nonnegative Lebesgue measurable f:V→[0,∞], ∫Vf(y) dλ1(y)=∫Uf(T(x)) ∣T′(x)∣ dλ1(x).

[F4]

Powers (Laws of integer exponents, Integer powers am): for real a,b and natural m, (ab)m=ambm, and a0=1.

Proof

technique · direct: the Bishop–Gromov ratio is nonincreasing, and for the two radii $r<2r$ this rearrangement gives the doubling inequality; the model factors are then evaluated from the explicit comparison-sine formulas, with the homogeneous substitution $t\mapsto 2t$ for the Lebesgue integral
1.1F1given

The doubling inequality. [F1, given] Fix r>0. By monotonicity of the Bishop–Gromov ratio in [F1], vol⁡g(B(p,2r))Vk⋆(2r)=Rp(2r)≤Rp(r)=vol⁡g(B(p,r))Vk⋆(r). Multiplying by the positive number Vk⋆(r)Vk⋆(2r) [F1, F2] gives vol⁡g(B(p,2r))≤Vk⋆(2r)Vk⋆(r)vol⁡g(B(p,r)), the asserted inequality, both volumes being finite by [F1].

1.2F2F3F4

The factor for k=0 is 2n. [F2, F3, F4] By [F2], V0⋆(r)=ωn−1∫0rtn−1 dt for every r>0. The map T:(0,r)→(0,2r), T(x)=2x, is a C1 diffeomorphism with T′(x)=2, and t↦tn−1 is nonnegative and continuous, hence Lebesgue measurable; [F3] applied to it gives, using [F4] to expand (2x)n−1=2n−1xn−1, ∫02rtn−1 dt=∫0r(2x)n−1⋅2 dx=2n−1⋅2∫0rxn−1 dx=2n∫0rtn−1 dt. The common factor ωn−1 cancels in the quotient, so V0⋆(2r)/V0⋆(r)=2n.

1.3F2F3

The factor for k<0. [F2, F3] Write σ:=−k>0. By the substituted formula of [F2], the common factor ωn−1σ1−n cancels in the quotient and Vk⋆(2r)Vk⋆(r)=∫02rsinh⁡n−1(σt) dt∫0rsinh⁡n−1(σt) dt. Applying the substitution T(x)=2x of [F3] to the numerator, ∫02rsinh⁡n−1(σt) dt=2∫0rsinh⁡n−1(2σx) dx; applying it once more with x=rs to both numerator and denominator shows that the quotient is a function of the product σr=−k r alone.

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

Conclusion. [F2, step 1.1, step 1.2, step 1.3] Step 1.1 is the doubling inequality for every real k and every r>0. Its factor is 2n when k=0 by step 1.2 and is the displayed function of −k r when k<0 by step 1.3; in particular the factor for k<0 is scale-dependent and no constant independent of r is asserted. For k>0, Vk⋆(2r)=Vk(π/k) once 2r≥π/k; the denominator reaches this value only when r≥π/k. In general the saturated formula of [F2] gives the displayed quotient of integrals over (0,min⁡{2r,π/k}) and (0,min⁡{r,π/k}), which is 1 for r≥π/k. The case n=2 is included with exponent n−1=1; the endpoint r=0 is excluded. Only the single substitution t↦2t and the inherited [A1] are used, so no additional choice is made.

Source locator

Datar §§27.2 and 28.1, pp.200–209, and Eschenburg §§4–5, pp.15–20, record the Bishop–Gromov ratio and its model comparison; the doubling form is the rearrangement of the monotonicity at the two radii r<2r. The Euclidean factor 2n is the homogeneity of the model density tn−1, and the negative-curvature factor is the corresponding hyperbolic-sine quotient of the model volume definition.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources