How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Volume doubling under a nonnegative ricci lower bound
Statement
Assume the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice . Let be a complete, connected, boundaryless Riemannian manifold of dimension with for a real number , let , and let be the saturated model ball volume of Model space radial area and ball volume. Then for every , so the ball volume is doubled at the cost of the explicit model factor. When this factor is exactly while for it is the scale-dependent model ratio a function of the product alone; no uniform bound independent of is asserted for . For each model volume is saturated once its own radius reaches the model pole, so the factor is . No compactness of is assumed, and no choice beyond the inherited is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The inherited of [A1]; a complete, connected, boundaryless Riemannian manifold of dimension with ; a point ; the ball volumes ; and the saturated model volume .
The countable-choice premise is the inherited (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), carried by the Bishop–Gromov and change-of-variables suppliers below.
Bishop–Gromov volume comparison (Bishop gromov volume comparison): the ratio is well defined, nonincreasing on , tends to as , and satisfies for every .
Model volume (Model space radial area and ball volume, Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions): for and for , where ; moreover and, for ,
Change of variables (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions): for a diffeomorphism of open subsets of and every nonnegative Lebesgue measurable ,
Powers (Laws of integer exponents, Integer powers ): for real and natural , , and .
Proof
The doubling inequality. [F1, given] Fix . By monotonicity of the Bishop–Gromov ratio in [F1], Multiplying by the positive number [F1, F2] gives the asserted inequality, both volumes being finite by [F1].
The factor for is . [F2, F3, F4] By [F2], for every . The map , , is a diffeomorphism with , and is nonnegative and continuous, hence Lebesgue measurable; [F3] applied to it gives, using [F4] to expand , The common factor cancels in the quotient, so .
The factor for . [F2, F3] Write . By the substituted formula of [F2], the common factor cancels in the quotient and Applying the substitution of [F3] to the numerator, ; applying it once more with to both numerator and denominator shows that the quotient is a function of the product alone.
Conclusion. [F2, step 1.1, step 1.2, step 1.3] Step 1.1 is the doubling inequality for every real and every . Its factor is when by step 1.2 and is the displayed function of when by step 1.3; in particular the factor for is scale-dependent and no constant independent of is asserted. For , once ; the denominator reaches this value only when . In general the saturated formula of [F2] gives the displayed quotient of integrals over and , which is for . The case is included with exponent ; the endpoint is excluded. Only the single substitution and the inherited [A1] are used, so no additional choice is made.
Source locator
Datar §§27.2 and 28.1, pp.200–209, and Eschenburg §§4–5, pp.15–20, record the Bishop–Gromov ratio and its model comparison; the doubling form is the rearrangement of the monotonicity at the two radii . The Euclidean factor is the homogeneity of the model density , and the negative-curvature factor is the corresponding hyperbolic-sine quotient of the model volume definition.
Depends on
- Bishop gromov volume comparison
- Model space radial area and ball volume
- Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions
- Laws of integer exponents
- Integer powers $a^m$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (2025) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J.-H. Eschenburg, Comparison Theorems in Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)