Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rigidity in bishop gromov on an interval

Statement

Assume the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice ACω. Let (M,g) be a complete, connected, boundaryless Riemannian manifold of dimension n≥2 whose Ricci curvature satisfies Ric⁡≥(n−1)k g for a real number k, let p∈M, and let R>0 with R<π/k when k>0. Suppose that the Bishop–Gromov ratio Rp(r)=vol⁡g(B(p,r))/Vk⋆(r) of Bishop gromov volume comparison takes equal values at two radii, Rp(r)=Rp(R)for some 0<r<R. Then:

  1. Density equality. Jp(t,v)=sn⁡k(t)n−1 for every t∈(0,R) and σp-almost every v∈SpM; in particular cp(v)≥R for almost every v. Equality of the ratio alone therefore forces radial density equality almost everywhere up to R.
  2. Riccati and curvature rigidity. For almost every v∈SpM and every t∈(0,R): the radial Riccati operator satisfies Sv(t)=ct⁡k(t)id⁡, the radial Jacobi tensor satisfies Av(t)=sn⁡k(t)Pt on N0, the curvature operator satisfies Rγv(t)=kid⁡ on the parallel-trivialized space N0 (equivalently R(W,γ˙v)γ˙v=kW on Nγv(t)), and every tangent two-plane containing γ˙v(t) has sectional curvature k.
  3. Model metric on the ball. Suppose in addition that no radial geodesic from p has a cut point at distance <R, that is cp(v)≥R for every v∈SpM, equivalently Cut⁡(p)∩B(p,R)=∅. Then exp⁡p is a diffeomorphism from the open tangent ball B0(R)={x∈TpM:∣x∣<R} onto B(p,R), and for every x=tv∈B0(R) with 0<t<R and ∣v∣=1 and every a,b∈TpM, (exp⁡p∗g)x(a,b)=⟨a,b⟩+(sn⁡k(t)2t2−1)⟨a⊥,b⊥⟩, with the continuous value gp at x=0, where a⊥=a−⟨a,v⟩v and b⊥=b−⟨b,v⟩v. Equivalently the metric in geodesic polar coordinates about p is g=dr2+sn⁡k(r)2σ, where σ is the round metric of the unit sphere of (TpM,gp) carried along.
  4. Isometry with the model ball. Under the additional hypothesis of part 3, let Mk be the model space form of curvature k realized as the round sphere S1/kn for k>0, as Euclidean Rn for k=0, and as the upper half-space Un={y>0} with metric ((−k)y2)−1∑a=1ndxa⊗dxa for k<0; let o be its pole (a point of the sphere, the origin, or en). Then for every linear isometry L:TpM→ToMk the map exp⁡oMk∘L∘exp⁡p−1 is an isometry from B(p,R) onto the open metric ball BMk(o,R); in particular B(p,R) is isometric to the open radius-R ball of the simply connected space form of constant sectional curvature k.

The equality hypothesis is a genuine equality case: without it only vol⁡g(B(p,r))≤Vk⋆(r) holds, and the ratio can be below one. A constant value below one can occur on the saturated positive-curvature range, not on the nonsaturated interval covered by the equality hypothesis here. No compactness of M is assumed; for k>0 the manifold is compact by Bonnet–Myers. No choice beyond the inherited ACω is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The inherited ACω of [A1]; a complete, connected, boundaryless Riemannian manifold (M,g) of dimension n≥2 with Ric⁡≥(n−1)k g for a real number k; a point p∈M; a radius R>0 with R<π/k when k>0; radii 0<r<R with Rp(r)=Rp(R); the unit sphere SpM with its polar surface measure σp; the cut time cp and the cut locus Cut⁡(p); the radial geodesics γv(t)=exp⁡p(tv); the radial volume Jacobian Jp(t,v); the radial Jacobi tensor Av with parallel-frame matrix Aˉv and the radial Riccati operator Sv; the model functions sn⁡k, ct⁡k, Wk=sn⁡kn−1; and the model space Mk of part 4.

[A1]

The countable-choice premise is the inherited ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), carried by the cut-time, curvature, polar-integration and convergence suppliers below; no further selection is made.

[F1]

Bishop–Gromov comparison (Bishop gromov volume comparison): Rp is well defined on (0,∞), nonincreasing, satisfies lim⁡s↓0Rp(s)=1, and vol⁡g(B(p,s))≤Vk⋆(s) for every s>0; when k>0 it is constant on [π/k,∞).

[F2]

Relative volume density comparison (Relative volume density comparison, Radial volume jacobian): Jp(t,v)=det⁡av(t)>0 for 0<t<cp(v) with Jp(t,v)/tn−1→1, and with qv(t):=Jp(t,v)sn⁡k(t)n−1 defined on Iv:=(0,min⁡(cp(v),π/k)) when k>0 and on Iv:=(0,cp(v)) when k≤0, the function qv is differentiable, nonincreasing and satisfies qv≤1 and qv(0+)=1 on Iv.

[F3]

Polar integration (Polar integration may discard the cut locus): σp is a finite Borel measure on SpM with σp(SpM)=ωn−1, and for every Borel f:M→[0,∞], ∫Mf dvol⁡g=∫SpM∫0cp(v)f(γv(t))det⁡av(t) dt dσp(v).

[F4]

Model functions and model volumes (Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions, Model space radial area and ball volume, Model functions solve the constant curvature jacobi equation): sn⁡k(0)=0, sn⁡k′(0)=1, sn⁡k>0 on (0,π/k) for k>0 and on (0,∞) for k≤0; ct⁡k=sn⁡k′/sn⁡k satisfies ct⁡k′+ct⁡k2=−k and ct⁡k(t)=t−1+O(t); and Vk⋆(s)=Vk(s)=ωn−1∫0sWk for 0<s≤π/k.

[F5]

Radial Jacobi tensor and Riccati equation (Radial Jacobi tensor, Radial riccati operator, Radial riccati equation): Av(t)w=Jw(t) is the Jacobi field with Jw(0)=0, DtJw(0)=w; Aˉv=Pt−1Av has Aˉv(0)=0, Aˉv′(0)=id⁡; Sv=Aˉv′Aˉv−1 is defined, smooth and self-adjoint for 0<t<τv, where τv is the first conjugate instant of p along γv; and on that interval Sv′+Sv2+Rγv=0,Rγv=Pt−1∘R(⋅,γ˙v)γ˙v∘Pt.

[F6]

Cut time and minimizing rays (Cut time in a unit tangent direction, Minimizing along a geodesic is an initial interval property, Cut point and cut locus of a point): cp(v)=sup⁡{t>0:dg(p,γv(t))=t} and dg(p,γv(t))=t for every 0<t<cp(v); when cp(v)<+∞ the cut point γv(cp(v)) lies at distance cp(v) from p; and Cut⁡(p)={γv(cp(v)):cp(v)<+∞}. By Bonnet myers, when k>0 one has cp(v)≤π/k for every v.

[F7]

Exponential map on the cut domain (The exponential map is a diffeomorphism on the open tangent cut domain): Dp:={tv:v∈SpM, 0<t<cp(v)} is open in TpM and exp⁡p∣Dp:Dp→M∖({p}∪Cut⁡(p)) is a diffeomorphism; moreover exp⁡p is smooth and d(exp⁡p)0=id⁡TpM in the canonical identification (The differential of exp at zero is the identity).

[F8]

Differential of the exponential map (Differential of the exponential map in terms of Jacobi fields): for v∈SpM, t>0 and a∈TpM, if Ya is the Jacobi field along the unit-speed geodesic γv with Ya(0)=0 and DtYa(0)=a, then d(exp⁡p)tv(a)=1tYa(t); the identity holds in the canonical identification Ttv(TpM)≅TpM.

[F9]

Tangential Jacobi fields (Tangential jacobi fields are affine multiples of the velocity): along the unit-speed geodesic γv, the unique Jacobi field with J(0)=0 and DtJ(0)=λv is J(t)=tλPtv; in particular it is tangential and orthogonal to every normal Jacobi field along γv.

[F10]

Spectral calculus for self-adjoint endomorphisms (Real spectral theorem: a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis): a self-adjoint endomorphism S of an m-dimensional real inner product space has real eigenvalues λ1,…,λm and tr⁡S=∑iλi, tr⁡(S2)=∑iλi2; consequently mtr⁡(S2)−(tr⁡S)2=∑i<j(λi−λj)2≥0, with equality if and only if S is a scalar multiple of the identity.

[F11]

Vanishing of a nonnegative integrand (A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere): if f≥0 is measurable with ∫f dμ=0, then f=0 μ-almost everywhere.

[F12]

Model Jacobi tensor (Model functions solve the constant curvature jacobi equation, Radial Jacobi tensor, Curvature tensor of constant sectional curvature, Existence and uniqueness of jacobi fields from initial data): on a Riemannian manifold of constant sectional curvature k the curvature endomorphism acts on normal vectors as k times the identity (R(X,T)T=kX for X⊥T), so the field t↦sn⁡k(t)PtE solves the Jacobi equation with J(0)=0, DtJ(0)=E by the model differential identities, and by uniqueness it is that normal Jacobi field; consequently the radial Jacobi tensor is sn⁡k(t)id⁡ in any parallel normal frame.

[F13]

Model realizations (The round sphere has positive constant sectional curvature, Round sphere model geometry, Sn is simply connected for every n≥2, Euclidean space has zero curvature, R and Rn for n≥1 with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in R, Every nonempty convex subset of Rn is contractible, Upper half-space model geometry, A contractible space has trivial fundamental group, Simply connected topological spaces): the sphere S1/kn (k>0) has constant sectional curvature k, cut time co(v)=π/k at every unit v and cut locus {−o}, and is metrically complete, hence geodesically complete; it is simply connected by the higher-dimensional-spheres theorem; Euclidean Rn has zero curvature, is metrically complete and is contractible because it is a nonempty convex subset of itself; and for k<0 the metric gk=((−k)y2)−1∑adxa⊗dxa on Un={y>0}, y=xn, is the case a=−k of the half-space model proposition and is complete, connected and of constant sectional curvature k.

[F14]

Cartan–Hadamard, unique minimizing geodesics and Hopf–Rinow (Cartan hadamard, Simply connected complete nonpositively curved manifolds have unique geodesics between points, Hopf–Rinow theorem): a complete, connected, simply connected manifold with K≤0 has global exponential diffeomorphisms and unique minimizing geodesics, so d(o,exp⁡oy)=∣y∣; and on a complete connected Riemannian manifold every pair of points is joined by a minimizing geodesic, and every closed bounded subset is compact (so a connected Riemannian manifold is metrically complete exactly when its closed bounded subsets are compact).

Proof

technique · direct: extend the radial volume Jacobian and the model density by zero, write the ball volume as the spherical integral of the model-weighted means of the extended relative density, and read off from monotonicity plus the limit one at the origin that equality of the ratio at two radii forces the extended density to be one almost everywhere; the traced Riccati equation and equality in the Cauchy–Schwarz step then force the Riccati operator, the curvature and the radial Jacobi tensor to their model values, which determine the metric in geodesic normal coordinates by the Jacobi-field formula for the differential of the exponential map; continuity of the metric extends the formula from almost every direction to the whole ball, and the same computation for the model, together with the diffeomorphism property of the two exponential maps, gives the isometry
1.1F2F3F4F6given

The extended relative density and the weighted means. [F2, F3, F4, F6, given] Define Wk(t):=sn⁡k(t)n−1 on the positive domain of sn⁡k and Wk(t):=0 for t≥π/k when k>0, and extend the radial volume Jacobian by zero past the cut time, J~v(t):=Jp(t,v)  (0<t<cp(v)),J~v(t):=0  (t≥cp(v)), and then Qv(t):=J~v(t)/Wk(t) where Wk(t)>0, Qv(t):=0 where Wk(t)=0. By [F4] and [F6] the identity QvWk=J~v holds on all of (0,∞): where Wk>0 it is the definition, and for k>0 and t≥π/k≥cp(v) both sides vanish. On (0,min⁡(cp(v),π/k)) or (0,cp(v)) according as k>0 or k≤0, the function Qv equals qv, so by [F2] it is nonincreasing, satisfies 0≤Qv≤1 and Qv(t)→1 as t↓0. For 0<s≤R define Av(s):=∫0sQvWk∫0sWk,so 0≤Av(s)≤1, a measurable function of v because Qv is [F3, F2]. The inner integral is positive: ∫0sWk>0 for every s>0 by [F4]. For 0<s1<s2 the two-interval estimate for a nonincreasing profile gives Av(s2)≤Av(s1): with N=∫0s1QvWk, D=∫0s1Wk, M=∫s1s2QvWk, E=∫s1s2Wk one has Qv(t)Wk(t)D≤Wk(t)N for t∈(s1,s2) after integrating Qv(t)≤Qv(s) against Wk(s)≥0 over s∈(0,s1), and integration over t∈(s1,s2) gives DM≤NE, that is Av(s2)≤Av(s1). Moreover Av(s)→1 as s↓0: given ε>0 choose δ>0 with ∣Qv−1∣≤ε on (0,δ) by [F2], then for 0<s<δ, ∣Av(s)−1∣≤sup⁡0<t<s∣Qv(t)−1∣≤ε.

1.2F13F14given

The three model spaces. [F13, F14, given] For the model of part 4: (i) for k>0, Mk=S1/kn has constant sectional curvature k and cut time co(v)=π/k>R at every unit v, so B0(R)∖{0}⊆Do; [F7] applies off zero. At zero its differential is the identity, and no other vector of B0(R) maps to o, so it extends to a diffeomorphism onto BMk(o,R); also S1/kn is simply connected and geodesically complete, hence metrically complete by Hopf–Rinow [F13, F14]; (ii) for k=0, Mk=Rn is complete and contractible, hence simply connected, with zero curvature [F13]; (iii) for k<0, the half-space (Un,gk) has constant sectional curvature k [F13], is convex and therefore contractible and simply connected, and is complete by the half-space model proposition [F13]; it has K=k<0 and is simply connected, so Cartan–Hadamard [F14] makes exp⁡o:ToMk→Mk a global diffeomorphism. In the spherical case, [F7] and the explicit round-sphere distance formula give d(o,exp⁡oy)=∣y∣ for ∣y∣<R. In the Euclidean case this is the Euclidean distance formula; in the nonpositive-curvature case, the cited unique-minimizing-geodesic result gives the same radial distance identity. Thus in all cases exp⁡o maps B0(R)⊆ToMk diffeomorphically onto BMk(o,R), with the pole included.

1.3F6F7F14given

The exponential is a diffeomorphism onto the ball. [F6, F7, F14, given] Assume cp(v)≥R for every v∈SpM. Then B0(R)∖{0}⊆Dp, and [F7] makes exp⁡p∣Dp a diffeomorphism onto M∖({p}∪Cut⁡(p)); restricted to B0(R)∖{0} it is injective with nonsingular differential. At zero, [F7] gives the identity differential and image p; all other vectors of B0(R) map to points at positive distance from p. Its image is exactly B(p,R): it is contained in B(p,R) because dg(p,exp⁡p(x))≤∣x∣<R, and conversely every q∈B(p,R) with q≠p is exp⁡p(w) for a minimizing geodesic [0,1]∋s↦exp⁡p(sw) of length dg(p,q)<R, by Hopf–Rinow ([F14]); while p=exp⁡p(0). Hence exp⁡p:B0(R)→B(p,R) is a bijective local diffeomorphism, i.e. a diffeomorphism.

2.1F1F2F3F4F6step 1.1given

Ball volume as a spherical integral of weighted means. [F1, F2, F3, F4, F6, step 1.1, given] Fix 0<s≤R and apply the polar formula [F3] to f:=1B(p,s). For 0<t<cp(v) one has dg(p,γv(t))=t by [F6], hence 1B(p,s)(γv(t))=1{t<s} and vol⁡g(B(p,s))=∫SpM∫0min⁡(cp(v),s)Jp(t,v) dt dσp(v)=∫SpM(∫0sJ~v)dσp(v), the last identity by the extension by zero of J~v in step 1.1 (for k>0 one has cp(v)≤π/k by [F6], so the truncation is consistent with the vanishing of Wk beyond the model pole). Since J~v=QvWk [step 1.1] and Vk⋆(s)=Vk(s)=ωn−1∫0sWk by [F1, F4] for s≤R<π/k or k≤0, division gives the identity of finite real numbers Rp(s)=1ωn−1∫SpMAv(s) dσp(v),0<s≤R.

2.2F4F8F9F12step 1.2given

The model pullback metric. [F4, F8, F9, F12, step 1.2, given] Fix y=tv∈B0(R) in the model, ∣v∣=1, and a=a⊥+λv in ToMk. The model has constant sectional curvature k, so by [F12] the normal part of the Jacobi field Ya with initial data (0,a) is sn⁡k(t)Pta⊥, while its tangential part is tλPtv by [F9]; hence, applying [F8] to this model Jacobi field, (exp⁡o∗gk)y(a,b)=sn⁡k(t)2t2⟨a⊥,b⊥⟩+⟨a,v⟩⟨b,v⟩ for all a,b∈ToMk, where the inner products are those of gk at o, identified with those of TpM through the linear isometry L.

3.1F1F11step 1.1step 2.1given

Equality of the ratio forces the extended density to be one. [F1, F11, step 1.1, step 2.1, given] Since Rp is nonincreasing [F1] and Rp(r)=Rp(R), one has Rp(s)=Rp(R) for every s∈[r,R]; in particular ∫SpM(Av(r)−Av(R))dσp(v)=ωn−1(Rp(r)−Rp(R))=0 by step 2.1. The integrand is nonnegative because Av is nonincreasing in the radius [step 1.1], so Av(r)−Av(R)=0 for σp-almost every v by [F11]. Fix such a v and put c:=Av(r)=Av(R)∈[0,1]. Set ϕ:=Qv−c, which is nonincreasing [step 1.1]. The two equal averages give ∫0rϕWk=0 and ∫rRϕWk=0. Put D1:=∫0rWk>0 and D2:=∫rRWk>0. Monotonicity yields 0=D2∫0rϕ(s)Wk(s) ds−D1∫rRϕ(t)Wk(t) dt=∫0r∫rR(ϕ(s)−ϕ(t))Wk(s)Wk(t) dt ds, whose integrand is nonnegative. Thus ϕ(s)=ϕ(t) for almost every cross-pair, so Fubini implies that ϕ is constant almost everywhere on (0,R). Its average on (0,r) is zero, so that constant is zero. Thus Qv=c almost everywhere on (0,R), and therefore Av(s)=c for every 0<s≤R, because Qv−c vanishes almost everywhere on each interval (0,s). Passing to the limit s↓0 and using Av(0+)=1 [step 1.1] gives c=1. Hence Qv=1 almost everywhere on (0,R); since Qv is nonincreasing, Qv≡1 on (0,R): if Qv(t0)<1 for some t0∈(0,R), then Qv(t)≤Qv(t0)<1 for every t∈(t0,R), contradicting Qv=1 almost everywhere. On (0,R) one has Qv=qv=Jp/sn⁡kn−1 by step 1.1 and [F2, F4], so Jp(t,v)=sn⁡k(t)n−1(0<t<R) for σp-almost every v; and cp(v)≥R for such v, since Qv vanishes on [cp(v),∞) by step 1.1 and equals 1 on (0,R).

4.1F2F4F5F10step 3.1given

The traced Riccati equation forces Sv=ct⁡kid⁡. [F2, F4, F5, F10, step 3.1, given] Fix v with Jp(t,v)=sn⁡k(t)n−1 on (0,R) [step 3.1]. For 0<t<min⁡(cp(v),τv) the logarithmic-derivative identity (Logarithmic derivative of the radial volume jacobian is the distance laplacian) gives h(t):=tr⁡Sv(t)=ddtlog⁡Jp(t,v)=(n−1)ddtlog⁡sn⁡k(t)=(n−1)ct⁡k(t) on (0,R), since ct⁡k=sn⁡k′/sn⁡k and Jp is positive there [F2, F4]; and (0,R) lies inside the domain of definition of Sv because R≤cp(v)≤τv (Cut time does not exceed first conjugate time, [F5, F6]). Taking traces in the Riccati equation of [F5] on (0,R) gives the exact identity h′(t)+tr⁡(Sv(t)2)+Ric⁡γv(t)(γ˙v(t),γ˙v(t))=0, where tr⁡Rγv=Ric⁡(γ˙v,γ˙v) by the trace definition of the Ricci curvature (Ricci curvature) in a parallel orthonormal frame, and Sv(t) is self-adjoint [F5]. Substituting h=(n−1)ct⁡k, h′=(n−1)ct⁡k′ and ct⁡k′+ct⁡k2=−k [F4], and using Ric⁡(γ˙v,γ˙v)≥(n−1)k, gives tr⁡(Sv2)=(n−1)(k+ct⁡k2)−Ric⁡γv(γ˙v,γ˙v)≤(n−1)ct⁡k(t)2=h(t)2n−1. By [F10] applied to the self-adjoint Sv(t) on the (n−1)-dimensional normal space, (n−1)tr⁡(Sv2)−h2=∑i<j(λi−λj)2≥0, so equality holds and all eigenvalues of Sv(t) are equal. Hence Sv(t) is a scalar multiple of the identity with trace h(t), that is Sv(t)=ct⁡k(t)id⁡N0(0<t<R), and equality in the displayed chain also gives Ric⁡γv(t)(γ˙v(t),γ˙v(t))=(n−1)k; the endpoint t=0 and the conjugate endpoint t=τv are excluded by [F5].

5.1F4F5F9step 4.1given

The curvature and the radial Jacobi tensor. [F4, F5, F9, step 4.1, given] Fix the same v. Substituting Sv=ct⁡kid⁡ into the Riccati equation Sv′+Sv2+Rγv=0 [F5] and using ct⁡k′+ct⁡k2=−k [F4] gives Rγv(t)=(−(ct⁡k′+ct⁡k2))(t)id⁡N0=kid⁡N0(0<t<R) for the parallel-frame curvature operator; since Pt is isometric (Radial Jacobi tensor), R(w,γ˙v(t))γ˙v(t)=kw for every w⊥γ˙v(t), so every tangent two-plane containing γ˙v(t) has sectional curvature k (Sectional curvature, Riemann curvature four-tensor). For the Jacobi tensor: Sv=Aˉv′Aˉv−1 means Aˉv′=ct⁡kAˉv on (0,R); every column c of Aˉv therefore satisfies c′=ct⁡kc, so c(t)=λcsn⁡k(t) for a constant λc because sn⁡k>0 and ddt(c/sn⁡k)=(ct⁡kc−ct⁡kc)/sn⁡k=0 [F4]. Evaluating the one-sided derivative at 0 using Aˉv(0)=0, Aˉv′(0)=id⁡ and sn⁡k(t)/t→1 [F4, F5] gives λc=c′(0)=ec, hence Aˉv(t)=sn⁡k(t)id⁡N0,Av(t)=sn⁡k(t)Pt(0<t<R), and therefore Av(t)w=sn⁡k(t)Ptw for every w∈N0.

6.1F8F9step 3.1step 5.1given

The metric in normal coordinates on the good directions. [F8, F9, step 3.1, step 5.1, given] Let G⊆SpM be the set of directions v satisfying the conclusions of steps 3.1 and 5.1; it has full σp-measure. Fix v∈G, t∈(0,R) and a∈TpM, and decompose a=a⊥+λv with a⊥∈N0 and λ=⟨a,v⟩. Let Ya be the Jacobi field along the unit-speed geodesic γv with Ya(0)=0, DtYa(0)=a. The field t↦sn⁡k(t)Pta⊥+tλPtv is a sum of two Jacobi fields: the first is Av(t)a⊥ by step 5.1 (Radial Jacobi tensor), and the second is the tangential field of [F9] with the same initial data (0,λv); the sum has initial data (0,a⊥+λv)=(0,a), so by uniqueness of Jacobi fields with prescribed initial data the two fields agree: Ya(t)=sn⁡k(t)Pta⊥+tλPtv. By [F8], d(exp⁡p)tv(a)=1tYa(t), and therefore, using that parallel transport is isometric and that normal and tangential fields are orthogonal, (exp⁡p∗g)tv(a,b)=1t2⟨Ya(t),Yb(t)⟩g=sn⁡k(t)2t2⟨a⊥,b⊥⟩+⟨a,v⟩⟨b,v⟩ for all a,b∈TpM and every v∈G. Equivalently, with ⟨a,b⟩=⟨a⊥,b⊥⟩+⟨a,v⟩⟨b,v⟩, (exp⁡p∗g)tv(a,b)=⟨a,b⟩+(sn⁡k(t)2t2−1)⟨a⊥,b⊥⟩.

7.1F4F7step 6.1given

The formula extends to the whole ball. [F4, F7, step 6.1, given] Define on B0(R) the tensor field Fx(a,b):=⟨a,b⟩+(sn⁡k(t)2/t2−1)⟨a⊥,b⊥⟩ for x=tv, ∣v∣=1, t>0, and F0:=⟨⋅,⋅⟩; the coefficient sn⁡k(t)2/t2 extends smoothly to t=0 with value 1, as the explicit branch formulas sn⁡k(t)=sin⁡(k t)/k, t, sinh⁡(−k t)/−k show (Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions), so F is a smooth tensor field on B0(R); and (exp⁡p∗g)0=⟨⋅,⋅⟩=F0 because d(exp⁡p)0=id⁡ [F7]. By step 6.1 the identity exp⁡p∗g=F holds at every x=tv with v∈G, 0<t<R. The set of such x is dense in B0(R): every nonempty open subset of SpM has positive surface measure, so the full-measure set G meets each such subset and is dense; a dense set of directions is dense in every sphere of radius t<R under the diffeomorphism v↦tv of the unit sphere onto itself. Both sides of the identity are continuous tensor fields on B0(R): the left side because exp⁡p is smooth [F7] and g is smooth, the right side because it is given by smooth formulas, has the normal-coordinate expression defining F. Hence exp⁡p∗g=F on all of B0(R), which is the displayed formula of part 3. In polar coordinates, an angular tangent vector ξ∈TvSpM maps under (t,v)↦tv to tξ, so its squared metric length is sn⁡k(t)2∣ξ∣2; this converts the normal-coordinate factor sn⁡k(t)2/t2 into the angular factor sn⁡k(t)2.

8.1step 6.1step 7.1step 1.3step 1.2step 2.2given∎

The isometry. [step 6.1, step 7.1, step 1.3, step 1.2, step 2.2, given] Assume the additional hypothesis of part 3 and let L:TpM→ToMk be a linear isometry. By steps 1.3 and 1.2 both exp⁡p−1:B(p,R)→B0(R) and exp⁡o:B0(R)→BMk(o,R) are diffeomorphisms, so Φ:=exp⁡o∘L∘exp⁡p−1 is a diffeomorphism from B(p,R) onto BMk(o,R). For x∈B(p,R), y=exp⁡p−1(x)=tv and u∈TxM put a:=d(exp⁡p−1)xu∈TpM; then dΦxu=d(exp⁡o)Ly(La), and by step 2.2 applied to La, (Φ∗gk)x(u,u′)=sn⁡k(t)2t2⟨(La)⊥,(La′)⊥⟩+⟨La,Lv⟩⟨La′,Lv⟩. Since L is an isometry, (La)⊥=L(a⊥), ⟨La,Lv⟩=⟨a,v⟩ and ⟨a,b⟩=⟨a⊥,b⊥⟩+⟨a,v⟩⟨b,v⟩; comparing with step 7.1 (with a=d(exp⁡p−1)xu and b=d(exp⁡p−1)xu′) gives (Φ∗gk)x(u,u′)=gx(u,u′) for all u,u′∈TxM and all x∈B(p,R). Hence Φ is an isometry from B(p,R) onto BMk(o,R), and B(p,R) is isometric to the open radius-R ball of the simply connected space form of curvature k. In each of the three realizations the named model is the simply connected space form of curvature k by step 1.2 and the cited curvature statements, and the ball BMk(o,R) is its open radius-R ball; the case n=2 enters only through n−1=1, and for k>0 the strict hypothesis R<π/k keeps the ball inside the injectivity radius of the pole. No step selects a direction, a frame, a chart or a subsequence from a family: every per-direction statement is made for a fixed v∈SpM, the exceptional set is the σp-null complement of G, and the only choice principle used is the inherited ACω of [A1] carried by the cut-time, Jacobi, polar and convergence suppliers.

Source locator

Datar's Lecture 24 (Prop. 24.1.1, Cor. 24.1.2 and Thm. 24.0.1 with its proof, pp.172–180) contains the model polar metric in geodesic normal coordinates, the model Jacobi fields and the local-isometry construction from the constant curvature of the pullback metrics; Thm. 28.1.1 and Thm. 28.2.1 (pp.205–212) contain the Bishop–Gromov comparison and its equality case, where equality forces the density quotient to be one and the radial curvature to be the model curvature. Eschenburg §§4–5 and 12 (pp.15–20, 45–47) uses the same quotient q(t)=j(t)/jˉ(t) and the same equality discussion in the Myers–Cheng rigidity theorem. Lee's Prop. 10.9 and Chapter 11 supply the constant-curvature normal form dr2+sn⁡k(r)2gSn−1. The proof above is carried out from the in-library polar integration formula, the relative density comparison, the traced Riccati equation, the Jacobi-field formula for the differential of the exponential map and the Cauchy–Schwarz equality case for a self-adjoint operator; the passage from almost every direction to the whole ball is the density of the full-measure set G together with the continuity of both sides of the metric identity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

256 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources