How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonnegative measurable function has integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere
Statement
Let be measurable. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonnegative measurable function .
The nonnegative integral is monotone and homogeneous (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
A statement holds almost everywhere when its exceptional set is contained in a measurable null set (Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure).
The nonnegative integral is the supremum of the integrals of simple minorants (The nonnegative Lebesgue integral).
The nonnegative integral agrees with the defining simple integral on simple functions (The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions).
Proof
Assume . For let . Then , so [L1] and [L4] give . Hence for every . Since , the exceptional set where is null, so almost everywhere by [L2].
Assume almost everywhere, and let be a measurable null set containing . For any disjoint simple representation , every with lies inside and has measure zero. Every zero-coefficient term contributes zero, including an omitted complement cell of infinite measure, by the simple integral's convention. Thus . The now-complete finite refinement proof of The simple integral is independent of the chosen representation makes this value independent of representation. Taking the supremum over all simple minorants in [L3] gives .
Step 1.1 proves the forward implication and step 1.2 proves the reverse implication.
Depends on
- The nonnegative Lebesgue integral
- Integral over a measurable subset
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions
- Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure
- The simple integral is independent of the chosen representation
Used by
- A C¹ diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L¹ functions Corollary
- A geodesic segment before its first conjugate point is locally energy minimizing Corollary
- A Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is almost everywhere equal to a Borel function Corollary
- Bounded Sobolev sequences have strongly convergent subsequences with the weak limit as limit Corollary
- Energy uniqueness for the wave Cauchy problem Corollary
- Infinite propagation speed for nonnegative heat data Corollary
- The obstacle reaction is supported on the contact set under measure regularity Corollary
- Uniqueness of classical Dirichlet and compatible Neumann solutions Corollary
- Finite speed of propagation does not imply strong Huygens Counterexample
- The Dirichlet function is positive on a dense set but has Lebesgue integral 0 Counterexample
- Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc Definition
- Direct integral of a measurable Hilbert field Definition
- Pullback of a distribution by a diffeomorphism Definition
- A disconnected Neumann domain has a multiple zero eigenvalue Example
- A two-dimensional pulse has a tail inside the cone Example
- Dilation determines the Riesz-potential target exponent Example
- L² forcing defines an H⁻¹ functional Example
- Poisson extension of an indicator arc Example
- The heat smoothing time exponent is forced by scaling Example
- The indicator of the rationals in [0,1] is Lebesgue integrable with integral 0 and not Riemann integrable Example
- The Neumann kernel is spanned by the componentwise constants Example
- Zero wave energy means a spatial constant, fixed by the displacement datum Example
- FALSE: a nonnegative measurable function with integral 0 vanishes everywhere False statement
- A function with nonnegative test pairings is nonnegative a.e. Lemma
- A UCB-invariant mean yields a topological invariant mean Lemma
- Compact-open neighbourhoods on the dual give a neighbourhood basis on the group Lemma
- Compactness, finite Haar volume and invariant vectors in the regular representation Lemma
- Conditional expectation is unique almost surely Lemma
- Continuous characters separate points of an LCA group Lemma
- Disintegration of a separable group representation over a commuting diagonal algebra Lemma
- Finite Haar mass, compact detection, and integrable pairings Lemma
- Finite positive circle measures admit a Lebesgue decomposition under countable choice Lemma
- Fourier uniqueness for continuous functions on the Euclidean torus Lemma
- Hedberg pointwise inequality for Riesz potentials Lemma
- L² with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space Lemma
- Measurable Gram-Schmidt and constant-field trivializations on dimension strata Lemma
- Near and far bounds for a Riesz potential Lemma
- Probability-density approximation of continuous tests and topological means Lemma
- Probability-density averages and locally detectable upper essential values Lemma
- Real L2 multipliers and unitary transport Lemma
…and 38 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard F. Bass, Real Analysis for Graduate Students, Proposition 8.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Proposition 2.16 (standard reference, not scraped)