Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact-open neighbourhoods on the dual give a neighbourhood basis on the group

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). Let G be a locally compact Hausdorff abelian group with dual G^ (The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology). For x1∈G, compact K⊆G^ and ϵ>0 put Nx1(K,ϵ):={x∈G:∣χ(x)−χ(x1)∣<ϵ for all χ∈K}. Then every Nx1(K,ϵ) is open in G, and these sets form a neighbourhood basis at x1. Consequently the evaluation map Φ:G→G^^, Φ(x)(χ):=χ(x), is a homeomorphism onto its image, and G carries the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets of G^.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A locally compact Hausdorff abelian group G, its dual G^ with the compact-open topology, a point x1∈G, a compact set K⊆G^ and ϵ>0.

[F1]

Characters are continuous homomorphisms G→T with pointwise multiplication, ∣χ∣≡1 and χ(−x)=χ(x)‾; the compact-open subbasis is S(L,V)={χ:χ[L]⊆V} for compact L⊆G and open V⊆T, and the evaluation pairing (χ,x)↦χ(x) is jointly continuous. (The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology, Evaluation of characters is jointly continuous, Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive, The multiplicative unit circle is a compact metrizable topological abelian group)

[F2]

Equicontinuity on compacts. For every compact K⊆G^ and every ϵ>0 there is an open neighbourhood W of 0 in G with ∣χ(w)−1∣<ϵ for all χ∈K∪{1} and all w∈W. Indeed joint continuity at (χ,0) gives for each χ∈K open sets Aχ∋χ, Wχ∋0 with ∣η(w)−1∣<ϵ on Aχ×Wχ; finitely many Aχ cover the compact set K, and the intersection of the corresponding Wχ together with a neighbourhood for the identity character is as required. (Evaluation of characters is jointly continuous, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, The multiplicative unit circle is a compact metrizable topological abelian group)

[F3]

If χ∈G^ and x∈G then χ(x)−χ(x1)=χ(x1)(χ(x−x1)−1), hence ∣χ(x)−χ(x1)∣=∣χ(x−x1)−1∣. (The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology, Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive)

[F4]

For every open neighbourhood U of 0 in G there is g∈Cc(G) with g≥0, g≢0 and supp⁡g−supp⁡g⊆U. Indeed, continuity of subtraction gives an open identity neighbourhood W with W−W⊆U; local compactness gives open V∋0 with compact closure contained in W. A cutoff equal to 1 at 0 and zero outside V has support in V‾, whose difference set is contained in U. (LCH Urysohn cutoff, Translations preserve compactly supported continuous functions, Compact support, Cc(X), and C0(X))

[F5]

For g∈Cc(G) the convolution square f:=g∗g~ lies in the positive core E, with f^=∣g^∣2≥0 and f(0)=∥g∥22>0 when g≢0 (Positive convolution squares form a dense inversion core, Fourier transform intertwines translation, modulation and convolution). The compatible dual Haar normalisation gives f^∈L1(G^,mG^) (Compatible dual Haar normalisation); Fourier inversion for integrable transforms then gives f(x)=∫G^f^(χ)χ(x) dmG^(χ) for every x∈G, since f is continuous (Fourier inversion for integrable transforms on LCA groups).

[F6]

For f^∈L1(G^) and δ>0, density supplies h∈Cc(G^) with ∥f^−h∥1<δ. For the compact set K=supp⁡h, nonnegativity of f^ gives ∫G^∖Kf^≤∥f^−h∥1<δ. (C_c(X) is dense in L^p(mu) for a Radon measure, Compact support, Cc(X), and C0(X), Radon measure on an LCH space)

[F7]

The evaluation map Φ(x)(χ):=χ(x) is injective: continuous characters separate points (Continuous characters separate points of an LCA group); the dual of a locally compact Hausdorff abelian group is again locally compact Hausdorff and abelian, so G^^ carries the compact-open topology with subbasic sets {ξ:ξ[L]⊆V} for compact L⊆G^ and open V⊆T. (The dual of a locally compact abelian group is locally compact abelian, The compact-open topology on C(X,Y) for arbitrary topological spaces, The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology)

[F8]

A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact space has a maximum: its image is a nonempty compact subset of the real metric line, and applying the metric extreme-value theorem to the identity on that image gives its maximum. (A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value)

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F8

If K=∅, then Nx1(K,ϵ)=G, which is open. Otherwise let x∈Nx1(K,ϵ) and put δ:=max⁡χ∈K∣χ(x)−χ(x1)∣. The maximum exists because K is nonempty compact and the function is continuous, and δ<ϵ since every value is strictly below ϵ. By [F2] applied with ϵ−δ>0 there is an open neighbourhood W of 0 with ∣χ(w)−1∣<ϵ−δ for all χ∈K∪{1} and w∈W. Then for w∈W and χ∈K, ∣χ(x+w)−χ(x1)∣≤∣χ(x)∣∣χ(w)−1∣+∣χ(x)−χ(x1)∣<ϵ−δ+δ=ϵ, using multiplicativity and ∣χ∣≡1; hence x+W⊆Nx1(K,ϵ) and the set is open.

1.2F4F5

Let U be an open neighbourhood of 0 in G. Choose g as in [F4] and put f:=g∗g~. Then f∈Cc(G)⊆L1(G)∩L2(G), f^=∣g^∣2≥0 belongs to L1(G^,mG^), and f(0)=∥g∥22>0; moreover f(x)=∫G^f^(χ)χ(x) dmG^(χ) for every x∈G.

2.1F5F6step 1.2

Choose a compact K0⊆G^ with ∫G^∖K0f^<f(0)/8 and ϵ0>0 with ϵ0∥f^∥1<f(0)/4. For x∈N0(K0,ϵ0) we have ∣f(x)−f(0)∣≤∫G^∣χ(x)−1∣f^(χ) dmG^(χ)≤ϵ0∥f^∥1+2∫G^∖K0f^<f(0)2, so f(x)≠0. Since f is continuous and f(x)≠0 forces x∈supp⁡f⊆supp⁡g−supp⁡g⊆U, we obtain N0(K0,ϵ0)⊆U.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1

For every x1∈G and every neighbourhood V of x1, choose an open neighbourhood V0 of x1 contained in V and apply step 2.1 to the open identity neighbourhood U:=V0−x1. This produces compact K0 and ϵ0>0 with x1+N0(K0,ϵ0)=Nx1(K0,ϵ0)⊆V; since x1+N0(K0,ϵ0) is a neighbourhood of x1, the sets Nx1(K,ϵ) form a neighbourhood basis at x1, each of them open by step 1.1.

4.1F1F7step 1.1step 3.1∎

Equip Φ(G) with the subspace topology from G^^. For compact L⊆G^ and open V⊆T, if L=∅ the preimage under Φ of {ξ:ξ[L]⊆V} is all of G. Otherwise, let x0 lie in that preimage. Joint continuity of evaluation [F1] gives, for each χ∈L, open neighbourhoods Uχ∋x0 and Wχ∋χ with η(x)∈V for (x,η)∈Uχ×Wχ. Compactness of L supplies a finite subcover Wχ1,…,Wχm; then U:=⋂j=1mUχj is a neighbourhood of x0 contained in that preimage. Thus Φ is continuous. Conversely, fix x1∈G, compact K⊆G^ and ϵ>0. If K=∅, then Nx1(K,ϵ)=G and its image is open in Φ(G). Otherwise set F(ξ,χ):=∣ξ(χ)−χ(x1)∣ on G^^×K. This is continuous by the joint evaluation pairing and continuity of the fixed evaluation at x1 [F1], and F(Φ(x1),χ)=0 for every χ∈K. For each χ∈K, continuity gives open neighbourhoods Aχ∋Φ(x1) and Bχ∋χ on which F<ϵ; choose a finite subcover Bχ1,…,Bχm of K. Then A:=⋂j=1mAχj is open and lies in {ξ:∣ξ(χ)−χ(x1)∣<ϵ for all χ∈K}. Thus A∩Φ(G)⊆Φ(Nx1(K,ϵ)). For any open U⊆G and each x1∈U, step 3.1 supplies one such basis set contained in U; the corresponding A is an open neighbourhood of Φ(x1) whose trace lies in Φ(U). Therefore Φ(U) is open in Φ(G), and Φ is open onto its image. By [F7] the map Φ is injective, hence a homeomorphism onto its image; by step 3.1 the topology of G is the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets of G^ transported by Φ.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

187 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources