How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Translations preserve compactly supported continuous functions
Statement
For an LCH group , or , and , one has , , and . All these functions belong to . At every , the maps and are continuous in uniform norm, with all supports in a fixed compact set on a neighbourhood of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: as in the statement.
Multiplication and inversion are continuous; each point has a compact neighbourhood. (Left Haar integral and left Haar measure)
The product of two compact spaces is compact. (A product of finitely many compact spaces is compact in the product topology)
Proof
The maps , and have continuous inverses , and inversion. They therefore carry the closure of the nonzero set onto the closure of its image. This gives exactly the three stated support formulas, and continuity of the pullbacks and compactness of their supports follow.
If , then and every asserted norm difference is zero. Otherwise choose a compact neighbourhood of and an open with . The sets and are compact images of compact products. Their union is compact: restrict any open cover to each of the two sets and join the finite subcovers. For it contains all left and right supports at and .
Fix . The two jointly continuous functions and vanish at . Collect all open rectangles about such points on which both absolute values are . Their second factors cover , so finitely many suffice. Intersect their first factors with , obtaining a neighbourhood of . For both differences are throughout and vanish off . Both uniform norms are therefore , as required. Only finite selections occurred.
Sources
Knapp, Advanced Real Analysis, VI §2, pp.225–230, Lemmas 6.9–6.13. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.
Depends on
- Left Haar integral and left Haar measure
- A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism
- A product of finitely many compact spaces is compact in the product topology
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Knapp, Advanced Real Analysis, VI §2, pp.225–230, Lemmas 6.9–6.13 (standard reference, not scraped)