Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Haar covering functionals are asymptotically additive

Statement

Assume AC. For f1,f2Cc(G)+, 0f0Cc(G)+ and ϵ>0, there is an open identity neighbourhood U such that every 0ϕCc(G)+ supported in U satisfies 0Iϕ(f1)+Iϕ(f2)Iϕ(f1+f2)<ϵ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the functions and error tolerance in the statement.

[F1]

Right translations of each compactly supported continuous function converge uniformly to it at the identity. (Translations preserve compactly supported continuous functions)

[F2]

Ratios are subadditive and homogeneous and Iϕ(h)(h:f0). (Haar covering ratios are finite and positive)

[F3]

Under DC a compact set has a compactly supported nonnegative cutoff equal to one on it. (LCH Urysohn cutoff)

[F4]

AC supplies the inherited cutoff choices. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If either fi=0, the error is zero. Otherwise set s=f1+f2, choose 0F1 compactly supported with F=1 on supps, and put B=(F:f0)>0, A=(s:f0)>0. Choose 0<δ<ϵ/(4(B+1)), then 0<η<ϵ/(4(A+δB+1)). Thus δB+2η(A+δB)<ϵ. AC implies the DC used for the cutoff.

F2F3F4
2.1

Put q=s+δF and hi=fi/q where q>0, and zero elsewhere. On suppfi, qδ; a point where q=0 is outside that closed support and has a neighbourhood where fi=0. Hence hi is continuous, supported in suppfi, and h1+h21. Choose U so hi(xz)hi(x)<η for all x, both i, and zU, using uniform right-translation continuity.

F1step 1.1
3.1

For a finite cover qcjLxjϕ, a nonzero term at y has xj1yU. Consequently hi(y)hi(xj)+η and fi(y)cj(hi(xj)+η)Lxjϕ(y). These coefficients are positive. The sum of the two coefficient sums is at most (1+2η)cj. Taking the infimum over covers of q, then dividing by (f0:ϕ), gives Iϕ(f1)+Iϕ(f2)(1+2η)(Iϕ(s)+δIϕ(F)).

F2step 2.1
4.1

Subtracting Iϕ(s) and using the coordinate bounds yields an upper error at most 2ηA+δ(1+2η)B<ϵ. Subadditivity gives its nonnegativity. The choices of δ,η,U preceded ϕ, so the bound holds uniformly for every allowed test function.

F2step 1.1step 3.1

Sources

Knapp, Advanced Real Analysis, VI §2, pp.225–230, Lemmas 6.9–6.13. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources