How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Haar candidate sets have the finite intersection property
Statement
Assume AC and fix . Put . For each open identity neighbourhood , let be the closure in of the vectors with and . These closed sets are nonempty and have the finite intersection property, and . Every common point, extended by value zero at , is additive, positively homogeneous, strictly positive on nonzero nonnegative functions, normalized at , and left invariant.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, , the product and closed candidate sets as stated.
Approximant vectors obey closed coordinate bounds and the exact normalization, homogeneity and invariance equations. (Normalized approximate Haar functionals are positive and invariant in the limit)
All sufficiently small-support approximants have arbitrarily small additivity error. (Haar covering functionals are asymptotically additive)
Under AC a product of compact spaces is compact. (Tychonoff's theorem: an arbitrary product of compact spaces is compact in the product topology, assuming the Axiom of Choice)
Closed sets with the FIP in a compact space have a common point. (A space is compact exactly when every family of closed subsets with the finite intersection property has nonempty intersection)
Cutoffs at a compact singleton exist under DC. (LCH Urysohn cutoff)
AC is assumed for the compact product and inherited cutoffs. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
For any , a cutoff at has , and compact support. Set . Then and its support lies in the compact set . Thus contains an approximant. The coordinate intervals are nonempty because they contain every such vector, and they are finite closed real intervals.
For finitely many neighbourhoods , their intersection is an identity neighbourhood, and . Step 1.1 makes this intersection nonempty. For the intersection is , also nonempty by an approximant. The compact real intervals and AC give compactness of , so the closed FIP theorem supplies a common point .
The closed equations in [F1] hold throughout each , hence for , and its strictly positive coordinate lower bounds persist. Set . For and , [F2] gives such that on its approximants. This finite-coordinate condition with upper bound is closed, so it holds for . An error in for every positive is zero. Thus is additive; when an argument is zero this is already the assigned zero value.
Sources
Knapp, Advanced Real Analysis, VI §2, pp.225–230, Lemmas 6.9–6.13. Local argument and conventions as displayed above.
Depends on
- Normalized approximate Haar functionals are positive and invariant in the limit
- Haar covering functionals are asymptotically additive
- Tychonoff's theorem: an arbitrary product of compact spaces is compact in the product topology, assuming the Axiom of Choice
- A space is compact exactly when every family of closed subsets with the finite intersection property has nonempty intersection
- LCH Urysohn cutoff
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Knapp, Advanced Real Analysis, VI §2, pp.225–230, Lemmas 6.9–6.13 (standard reference, not scraped)