Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-29 (claude-fable-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

In a locally compact Hausdorff space every open set containing a point contains an open set containing it whose closure is compact and still inside; such a space is regular

Statement

Let XX be a locally compact (Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space) Hausdorff (Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not) space, so that every point of XX has a compact neighbourhood (Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right). Closures are taken in XX unless a subscript names another space (Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space). Then:

  1. Shrinking with a compact closure. For every xXx \in X and every open UXU \subseteq X with xUx \in U there is an open VXV \subseteq X with xVVUx \in V \subseteq \overline{V} \subseteq U and V\overline{V} compact.
  2. A base. The family of open subsets of XX whose closure is compact is a basis for the topology of XX (Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets).
  3. Regularity. XX is regular (Regular spaces and T3T_3 spaces, with the source disagreement over whether regularity includes T1T_1 stated explicitly).

Nothing stronger than regularity is claimed: complete regularity of such a space is a separate statement, needs a continuous real-valued function, and is not proved here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A locally compact Hausdorff space XX, a point xXx \in X and an open set UXU \subseteq X with xUx \in U.

[A3]
[L1]

For SXS \subseteq X the open sets of the subspace SS are the traces USU' \cap S of the open sets of XX; an open subset of XX contained in SS is open in SS; and for STXS \subseteq T \subseteq X the topology SS inherits from TT is the topology it inherits from XX (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).

[L4]

A space is regular if and only if for every point pp of it and every set WW open in it with pWp \in W there is a set VV open in it with pVcl(V)Wp \in V \subseteq \operatorname{cl}(V) \subseteq W, the closure being taken in that space (A space is regular if and only if every point has a neighbourhood base of closed neighbourhoods, if and only if xUx \in U open gives an open VV with xVVUx \in V \subseteq \overline{V} \subseteq U, (a) iff (b), Regular spaces and T3T_3 spaces, with the source disagreement over whether regularity includes T1T_1 stated explicitly).

[L7]

A family of open sets is a basis for the topology exactly when for every open WW and every pWp \in W some member of the family contains pp and is contained in WW (Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [A1] fix a compact KXK \subseteq X and an open OXO \subseteq X with xOKx \in O \subseteq K; then Oint(K)O \subseteq \operatorname{int}(K) by [A3], so xint(K)x \in \operatorname{int}(K).

A1A3choose
1.2

The subspace KK is Hausdorff: distinct p,qKp, q \in K have disjoint open U1pU_1 \ni p and U2qU_2 \ni q in XX by [A2], and the traces U1KU_1 \cap K and U2KU_2 \cap K are disjoint open sets of the subspace containing pp and qq respectively.

A2L1
1.3

KK is closed in XX, being a compact subset of the Hausdorff space XX.

A2L2
2.1

The subspace KK is compact and Hausdorff, hence regular.

step 1.2L3
2.2

Put G:=Uint(K)G := U \cap \operatorname{int}(K); it is open in XX, contains xx by step 1.1, is contained in KK by [A3], and is therefore also open in the subspace KK.

step 1.1A3L1
3.1

Applying [L4] inside the space KK, which is regular by step 2.1, to the point xx and the set GG open in KK, there is a set VV open in KK with xVclK(V)Gx \in V \subseteq \operatorname{cl}_K(V) \subseteq G.

step 2.1step 2.2L4choose
4.1

VV is open in XX: by [L1] there is an open VXV' \subseteq X with V=VKV = V' \cap K, and since VGint(K)V \subseteq G \subseteq \operatorname{int}(K) we get V=Vint(K)=VKint(K)=Vint(K)V = V \cap \operatorname{int}(K) = V' \cap K \cap \operatorname{int}(K) = V' \cap \operatorname{int}(K), an intersection of two open subsets of XX.

step 2.2step 3.1L1A3
4.2

V=clK(V)\overline{V} = \operatorname{cl}_K(V): from VKV \subseteq K and KK closed in XX (step 1.3) the smallest closed superset of VV satisfies VK\overline{V} \subseteq K, and [L5] gives clK(V)=VK=V\operatorname{cl}_K(V) = \overline{V} \cap K = \overline{V}.

step 1.3step 3.1A3L5
5.1

V\overline{V} is compact: by step 4.2 it is clK(V)\operatorname{cl}_K(V), which is closed in the compact subspace KK and hence compact by [L6]; and by the transitivity clause of [L1] the topology it inherits from KK is the one it inherits from XX, so it is a compact subset of XX.

step 4.2L1L6
6.1

Combining, VV is open in XX by step 4.1, xVV=clK(V)GUx \in V \subseteq \overline{V} = \operatorname{cl}_K(V) \subseteq G \subseteq U by steps 3.1, 4.2 and 2.2, and V\overline{V} is compact by step 5.1; as xx and UU were arbitrary this is claim 1.

step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2step 5.1
7.1

The open subsets of XX with compact closure are open, and by step 6.1 every open UU and every xUx \in U admit such a set VV with xVUx \in V \subseteq U; so by [L7] they form a basis for the topology of XX, which is claim 2.

step 6.1L7
7.2

Step 6.1 gives, for every xx and every open UxU \ni x, an open VV with xVVUx \in V \subseteq \overline{V} \subseteq U, which is condition (b) of [L4] for the space XX; hence XX is regular, which is claim 3.

step 6.1L4
8.1

Steps 6.1, 7.1 and 7.2 are claims 1, 2 and 3, so the lemma is proved.

step 6.1step 7.1step 7.2

Remarks

  • Which clause of local compactness is used. Only that every point has a compact neighbourhood, in the weak sense of Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space: a compact KK with xx in its interior. The stronger-sounding conclusion, a neighbourhood base of open sets with compact closure, is derived from it here, and the Hausdorff hypothesis is what makes the derivation possible — it is used twice, once to make KK closed in XX and once to make the subspace KK regular.

  • Why the argument moves into the subspace KK and back out. Regularity is available inside KK, because KK is compact Hausdorff, and not yet available in XX — proving it for XX is claim 3. The two transfers back to XX are step 4.1, which uses that VV sits inside the open set int(K)\operatorname{int}(K), and step 4.2, which uses that KK is closed. Neither transfer works without its hypothesis: an open set of a subspace need not be open in the ambient space, and a closure computed in a subspace need not agree with the ambient closure.

  • Compactness of V\overline{V}, not merely of its closure inside KK. Compactness is a property of a space, and V\overline{V} carries the same topology whether it is reached through KK or directly from XX (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace); step 5.1 records that, so no second notion of "compact subset" is created.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 97 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources