Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The compact-open character group is a Hausdorff topological abelian group

Statement

Let G be an abelian topological group and let G^ be its Pontryagin dual (The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology). With pointwise multiplication and inversion, G^ is a Hausdorff topological abelian group (Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not). Explicitly, for f,g∈G^, compact K⊆G and ε>0, writing UK(f,r):={h∈G^:∣h(x)−f(x)∣<r for every x∈K} for r>0, these sets form a neighbourhood basis at f, and UK(f,ε/2)⋅UK(g,ε/2)⊆UK(fg,ε),UK(f,ε)−1=UK(f−1,ε).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

T is a compact metrizable topological abelian group; in particular multiplication and inversion are continuous and every element has modulus 1. For all z,w∈T one has ∣z−1−w−1∣=∣z−w∣ and ∣zw−z∣=∣w−1∣. (The multiplicative unit circle is a compact metrizable topological abelian group)

[F2]

G^=Hom⁡cts(G,T) is the set of continuous homomorphisms γ:G→T, with pointwise multiplication and the compact-open topology with subbasis S(K,V)={γ:γ[K]⊆V} for compact K⊆G and open V⊆T. (The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology)

[F3]

For all complex z,w: ∣zw∣=∣z∣∣w∣, ∣z+w∣≤∣z∣+∣w∣, and zz‾=∣z∣2; also ∣exp⁡(iy)∣=1 for real y. (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive, exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0)

Proof

Given: An abelian topological group G and its dual G^ with the compact-open topology.

1.1F1F2F4

Pointwise multiplication and inversion are well defined on G^ and give it the structure of an abelian group: for f,g∈G^ the maps fg and f−1 are group homomorphisms because (fg)(x+y)=f(x+y)g(x+y)=f(x)f(y)g(x)g(y)=f(x)g(x)f(y)g(y)=(fg)(x)(fg)(y) and f−1(x+y)=f(x+y)−1=f(x)−1f(y)−1 by [F2] and commutativity of T; they are continuous because x↦(f(x),g(x)) is continuous into the product by [F4], multiplication on T is continuous by [F1], and fg is the composite of these two maps, while f−1 is the composite of f with the continuous inversion of T by [F1] and [F4]. The group axioms for G^ hold pointwise because T is an abelian group by [F1], with pointwise constant 1 as identity.

1.2F2F3F7

Each UK(f,r) is compact-open open. First, for any character h and a>0, cover the compact image h[K] by finitely many balls B(zj,a/3) with centres in T, and put Lj:={x∈K:∣h(x)−zj∣≤a/3}. These closed subsets of K are compact and cover K by [F7]. The open set Wh:=⋂jS(Lj,B(zj,2a/3)) contains h and lies in UK(h,a) by the triangle inequality. Now if h∈UK(f,r) and K≠∅, the continuous function x↦∣h(x)−f(x)∣ attains a maximum m<r by [F7]; its continuity follows from ∣∣u−v∣−∣u′−v′∣∣≤∣u−u′∣+∣v−v′∣. Choose 0<a<r−m. The preceding Wh is contained in UK(f,r), so every member of UK(f,r) has an open neighbourhood inside it. If K=∅, UK(f,r)=G^.

1.3F1F3

The displayed estimates hold: for f′∈UK(f,ε/2), g′∈UK(g,ε/2) and x∈K, ∣f′(x)g′(x)−f(x)g(x)∣≤∣f′(x)−f(x)∣+∣g′(x)−g(x)∣<ε, since all values have modulus 1. Also ∣f′(x)−1−f(x)−1∣=∣f′(x)−f(x)∣; inversion is involutive, so the second displayed equality follows.

1.4F2F5F6

G^ is Hausdorff: if f≠g in G^, there is x∈G with f(x)≠g(x); by [F6] choose disjoint open V,W⊆T with f(x)∈V, g(x)∈W; then S({x},V) and S({x},W) are open in G^ by [F5], they contain f and g respectively, and they are disjoint because no function can take the same value in both V and W.

2.1step 1.2F2F3F7

These sets form a neighbourhood basis at f. If f∈S(K,V), cover f[K] by finitely many balls B(zj,aj) with aj>0 and B(zj,2aj)⊆V, using compactness of f[K] and openness of V. For r:=min⁡jaj>0, the triangle inequality gives UK(f,r)⊆S(K,V). For empty K take any r>0. Any finite intersection of such subbasic neighbourhoods contains U⋃jKj(f,min⁡jrj), and the union is compact by [F7]; an empty intersection is the whole dual. Together with step 1.2 this proves the basis assertion.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.3F4

Multiplication and inversion on G^ are continuous. By step 2.1 it suffices to test UK(fg,ε) and UK(f−1,ε) at arbitrary f,g. Step 1.3 maps the open rectangle UK(f,ε/2)×UK(g,ε/2) into the first set and maps the open neighbourhood UK(f,ε) into the second.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.3step 1.4step 3.1∎

The pointwise group of step 1.1 is Hausdorff by step 1.4 and has continuous operations by step 3.1, so it is a Hausdorff topological abelian group. The asserted neighbourhood basis and estimates are steps 2.1 and 1.3.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology.

Dependency tree · two levels

86 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources