Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Real L2 multipliers and unitary transport

Statement

Assume countable choice. In complex H=L2(Rn) use ⟨f,g⟩=∫fg‾. For finite real measurable m, set D(M)={f∈H:mf∈H} and Mf=mf. This is well-defined on classes, densely defined and self-adjoint. Here D(M∗) consists of those g∈H for which some h∈H satisfies ⟨Mf,g⟩=⟨f,h⟩ for every f∈D(M), and M∗g=h; density makes this value unique.

The operators Vtf=eitmf, t∈R, form a strongly continuous unitary group. The norm derivative lim⁡t→0(Vtf−f)/t exists exactly for f∈D(M) and then equals iMf.

For a specified unitary U:H→H, the operator P=U−1MU on D(P)=U−1D(M) is self-adjoint. Define eitP=U−1VtU; this group has derivative iP exactly on D(P). Only this explicitly transported exponential is being defined.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), the stated m and unitary U (a surjective complex-linear pairing isometry). Almost-everywhere equality preserves integrals (Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree).

[F1]

The complex pairing is definite, continuous and satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz (Complex completeness, density, and inner product: the consumer interface).

[F2]

Dominated convergence applies with an integrable majorant (Dominated convergence).

[F3]

Fatou bounds the integral of a nonnegative pointwise limit by the lower limit of its integrals (Fatou's lemma).

[F6]

The sine/cosine derivative formulas and the complex interval FTC give ∣eits−1∣≤∣ts∣ for real s,t, and derivative is at t=0 (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

Null-equivalent finite representatives give null-equivalent products; this applies to changes of m as well as f, so domain and value are well-defined. The domain is a vector subspace. With EN={∣m∣≤N} and fN=1ENf, one has ∥mfN∥2≤N∥f∥2, so fN∈D(M). Finiteness of m gives EN↑Rn, and [F2] applied to 1ENc∣f∣2≤∣f∣2 gives fN→f in norm. This proves density. If h,h′ both satisfy the adjoint identity for g, then ⟨f,h−h′⟩=0 on this dense domain; continuity in [F1] extends it to every f∈H, including h−h′, forcing h=h′.

1.2F1F2F5given

By [F5], VtVs=Vt+s, V0=I, V−t=Vt−1 and ⟨Vtf,Vtg⟩=⟨f,g⟩. For fixed f, ∣eitm−1∣2∣f∣2→0 pointwise as t→0, with majorant 4∣f∣2. [F2] gives strong continuity at zero; the isometry and group law give it at every t. Countable choice permits the sequential criterion for these real-parameter norm limits.

2.1step 1.1F1F4given

Real-valuedness of m and [F1] give ⟨Mf,g⟩=⟨f,Mg⟩ for f,g∈D(M), with both integrals absolutely convergent. Thus D(M)⊆D(M∗) with the same value. Conversely let M∗g=h. On EN, wN=1EN(mg−h) is in H, and mwN∈H because ∣m∣≤N there, so wN∈D(M). Inserting f=wN into the adjoint identity gives 0=⟨MwN,g⟩−⟨wN,h⟩=∫EN∣mg−h∣2. By [F4], mg=h a.e. on each EN. Their countable union is the whole space, so mg=h a.e. globally; in particular mg∈H. Thus D(M∗)=D(M) and the operators agree.

2.2step 1.2F2F3F6

If mf∈H, [F6] gives pointwise (eitm−1)f/t→imf and the squared error is at most 4∣mf∣2. [F2] proves norm convergence to iMf. Conversely, if the norm derivative exists, the quotients at t=1/(N+1) have bounded norms for N∈N. Their squared moduli tend pointwise to ∣mf∣2 by [F6]. [F3] gives ∫∣mf∣2≤lim inf⁡N∥(V1/(N+1)f−f)/(1/(N+1))∥22<∞. Thus f∈D(M), and the forward part identifies the derivative. This proves both directions, including points where m=0.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2step 2.2given∎

Since U and U−1 preserve norms and pairings, U−1D(M) is dense. For g,h∈H, the assertion ⟨Pf,g⟩=⟨f,h⟩ for every f∈D(P) is equivalent, by writing v=Uf, to ⟨Mv,Ug⟩=⟨v,Uh⟩ for every v∈D(M). By step 2.1 this holds exactly when Ug∈D(M) and Uh=MUg. Therefore D(P∗)=D(P) and P∗=P. Conjugating the group identities and norm limits of steps 1.2 and 2.2 by U proves the asserted unitary group, continuity, and both directions of the transported derivative-domain criterion. No spectral theorem or choice of a basis is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources