How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: a nonnegative measurable function with integral vanishes everywhere
Statement
If is measurable and , then for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The statement above.
A nonnegative measurable function has integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere, not everywhere (A nonnegative measurable function has integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere).
Degenerate intervals in have Lebesgue measure (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included).
Refutation
On with Lebesgue measure, let . By [L2], the [L2, given, construct] set is null, so .
But . Therefore the conclusion in the Statement is false, and [L1] shows that "almost everywhere" is the correct replacement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard F. Bass, Real Analysis for Graduate Students, Proposition 8.1 (standard reference, not scraped)