Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A geodesic segment before its first conjugate point is locally energy minimizing

Statement

Assume exactly the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice ACω. Let (M,g) be a connected finite-dimensional Riemannian manifold without boundary, a<b, and γ:[a,b]→M an affinely parametrized Levi-Civita geodesic such that for no t∈(a,b] are γ(a) and γ(t) conjugate along γ∣[a,t]. Let E be the half-energy of H1 Riemannian curves.

Then there is ε>0 such that every fixed-endpoint H1 curve α:[a,b]→M satisfying α(a)=γ(a),α(b)=γ(b),sup⁡t∈[a,b]dg(α(t),γ(t))<ε has E(α)≥E(γ), and equality holds if and only if α=γ. Thus γ is a strict local half-energy minimizer among fixed-endpoint H1 curves, also in the H1 path topology. Constant geodesics are included; no completeness, unit-speed assumption or compactness of M is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The manifold and conjugate-free geodesic in the statement, and an admissible fixed-endpoint H1 curve α. Put v=γ˙(a) and T=b−a>0.

[A1]

The inherited choice assumption is Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

For H1 Riemannian curves, the a.e. tangent velocity belongs to L2, Lg(α)=∫ab∣α˙∣g and E(α)=12∫ab∣α˙∣g2; smooth superposition and coordinate changes obey the a.e. L2 chain rule. The H1 path topology embeds in the uniform path topology (H-one Riemannian curves and their half-energy).

[F2]

The H1 local length comparison gives ε>0 such that Lg(α)≥Lg(γ) in that uniform neighborhood; if equality holds, then either both curves are the same constant curve or α=γ∘τ for an absolutely continuous nondecreasing H1 surjection τ:[a,b]→[a,b] fixing the endpoints (H-one local length comparison for a conjugate-free geodesic).

[F3]

The geodesic has constant speed ∣v∣g, so Lg(γ)=T∣v∣g and E(γ)=T∣v∣g2/2 (Geodesics have constant speed for a metric-compatible connection, H-one Riemannian curves and their half-energy).

[F4]

H"older with exponents 2,2 bounds the integral of a product by the product of its L2 norms (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases). A nonnegative measurable function with zero integral vanishes almost everywhere (A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4given

The full H1 energy bound. [F1, F2, F3, F4, given] Take ε from [F2] and an admissible α. Applying [F4] to s=∣α˙∣g∈L2 and the constant function 1, using [F1], gives Lg(α)2≤T∫abs2=2TE(α). Both lengths are nonnegative and [F2] gives Lg(α)≥Lg(γ). By [F3], E(α)≥Lg(α)22T≥Lg(γ)22T=E(γ). This argument uses the L2 speed of every H1 competitor, not a smooth approximation of the equality case.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1

Equality forces constant speed and the radial reparametrization. [F2, F3, F4, step 1.1, given] If E(α)=E(γ), both inequalities in step 1.1 are equalities. Thus Lg(α)=Lg(γ). Put s=∣α˙∣g and m=Lg(α)/T. Expanding the square using ∫s=Tm gives ∫ab(s−m)2=∫abs2−Tm2=2E(α)−Lg(α)2/T=0. By the zero-integral clause of [F4], s=m a.e., and by [F3] m=∣v∣g. If v=0, [F2] already gives α=γ. Suppose v≠0. The equality clause of [F2] produces an absolutely continuous nondecreasing H1 surjection τ fixing a,b and satisfying α=γ∘τ.

3.1F1F3step 2.1

The only equal-energy reparametrization is the identity. [F1, F3, step 2.1, given] The a.e. chain rule [F1] applied to the smooth geodesic and H1 function τ gives α˙(t)=γ˙(τ(t))τ′(t) a.e. Since τ is nondecreasing and a primitive, τ′≥0 a.e.; [F3] then gives ∣α˙∣g=∣v∣gτ′ a.e. By step 2.1 the left side equals ∣v∣g>0 a.e., so τ′=1 a.e. The primitive identity for τ and τ(a)=a yield τ(t)=a+∫at1 ds=t for every t. Hence α=γ. Conversely γ is admissible and has its own energy, proving the equality clause.

4.1A1F1step 1.1step 3.1∎

Locality and boundaries. [A1, F1, step 1.1, step 3.1, given] The radius in [F2] is positive, and [F1] makes its uniform neighborhood an open neighborhood in the fixed-endpoint H1 path topology. The preceding steps prove strictness there. For a constant geodesic, step 2.1 handles equality, including dimension zero. Only [A1] and the stated local suppliers are used; no global compactness or geodesic completeness enters.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources