Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A disconnected Neumann domain has a multiple zero eigenvalue

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC) and Countable Choice (CC). The explicit CC premise is used by Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms, while AC matches the cited componentwise-constancy and mean-zero Neumann results as currently stated. Let Ω⊂R2 be the union of two disjoint open discs B1,B2 (a nonempty bounded open set with exactly two connected components), and let a(u,v)=∫ΩDu⋅Dv‾ dx on H1(Ω) (Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms with aij=δij). Then a(u,u)≥0 with equality if and only if u is constant on each component, so the weak Neumann eigenvalue 0 has the two-dimensional eigenspace {c11B1+c21B2:c1,c2∈K}. The multiplicity of the zero eigenvalue equals the number of connected components. Consequently Poincare-Wirtinger with the global mean fails on Ω: the mean-zero function ∣B2∣1B1−∣B1∣1B2 has zero energy, so on the mean-zero subspace the Rayleigh infimum is 0, not positive, and the connectedness hypothesis of The first positive Neumann eigenvalue has the mean-zero Rayleigh characterisation cannot be dropped.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice; two nonempty disjoint open discs B1,B2⊂R2 of finite positive area ∣B1∣,∣B2∣ with Ω=B1∪B2; the Neumann form a(u,v)=∫ΩDu⋅Dv‾ dx on H1(Ω).

[F1]

The zero mode of the principal Neumann form: for a bounded open set the form a is nonnegative, and a(u,u)=0 if and only if Du=0 a.e., if and only if u is constant on every connected component (The Neumann spectrum and the constant zero mode, A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere, Zero weak gradient gives componentwise constants).

[F2]

Connected components: each disc Bj is connected, the two discs are disjoint open sets, so Ω has exactly the two connected components B1,B2; the componentwise constants c11B1+c21B2 (equal on Ω to cj on Bj) form a two-dimensional subspace of H1(Ω) (Connected components, quasicomponents, and totally disconnected spaces, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms).

[F3]

Integrals of indicators: ∫Ω1Bj dx=∣Bj∣ and integrals are additive, computed in the almost-everywhere class convention (Integral over a measurable subset, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

[F4]

The positive first level on the global mean-zero space requires connectedness and the extension-domain property; on a disconnected domain the mean-zero subspace is larger and the positivity is not forced (The first positive Neumann eigenvalue has the mean-zero Rayleigh characterisation).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2givenalgebra

Specialising [F1] to Ω=B1∪B2 gives a(u,u)=∥Du∥L22≥0, with equality exactly when Du=0 a.e., i.e. exactly when u is constant on each of the two components. Hence the kernel of the form on H1(Ω), that is the zero eigenspace of the weak Neumann problem, is the space {c11B1+c21B2} of [F2].

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

The two functions 1B1 and 1B2 are nonzero linearly independent classes and lie in the kernel by step 1.1, so the zero eigenspace is exactly two-dimensional; the multiplicity of the eigenvalue 0 equals the number 2 of connected components of Ω.

2.2F3step 1.1givenalgebra

Put g:=∣B2∣1B1−∣B1∣1B2. By [F2] it is componentwise constant, hence a nonzero element of H1(Ω) with zero weak gradient, and step 1.1 gives a(g,g)=0. Its global mean is ∣B2∣∫Ω1B1−∣B1∣∫Ω1B2=∣B2∣∣B1∣−∣B1∣∣B2∣=0 by [F3], so g lies in the mean-zero subspace V and is nonzero with vanishing Rayleigh quotient. Therefore inf⁡u∈V∖{0}a(u,u)/∥u∥L22=0 on this Ω.

3.1F1F4step 2.2given∎

Consequently no Poincare-Wirtinger inequality with the global mean and a positive constant can hold on the disconnected set Ω: such an inequality would bound ∥g∥L2 by a positive multiple of ∥Dg∥L2=0 for the nonzero function g of step 2.2. This shows that the connectedness hypothesis in [F4] cannot be dropped, while the two-dimensional zero eigenspace of step 2.1 shows that the multiplicity of the Neumann eigenvalue 0 equals the number of connected components.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

84 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources