How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Poisson extension of an indicator arc
Example
Let and , let be the centred open arc of radius , let be its indicator and let be the Poisson integral of . Then:
- is harmonic on and for every ;
- for every , and for every ;
- as for every interior point of , and as for every interior point of ; in particular the nontangential boundary value of is at interior points of and at interior points of the complement;
- at each of the two endpoints of the radial limit is : as ;
- the indicator itself has no two-sided pointwise boundary limit at either endpoint.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice; a radius , a centre written , the arc , the indicator and .
The torus is identified with the Euclidean circle by the bijection , and is the normalized Haar probability measure with and translation invariance. The circular distance is for , ; for the centred arc is open with ; and a complex-valued on has nontangential limit at whenever as without restriction (The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral, The circle maximal function and nontangential approach regions).
For , with ; the radial functions satisfy with , and is even because cosine is even (The Poisson integral of a finite complex boundary measure, The Poisson kernel on the unit disc).
For the Poisson kernel satisfies , , and for every one has as ; in torus coordinates these say and for every (The Poisson kernel is positive, has total mass one, and concentrates at a boundary point).
If and , then is complex harmonic, lies in and satisfies for every ; a complex-valued function is harmonic exactly when its real and imaginary parts are real harmonic (Poisson extension is an Lp contraction and converges in finite Lp, Harmonic Hardy classes on the unit disc).
A real harmonic function satisfies the circle mean-value property on every closed disc contained in its domain (Plane harmonic functions satisfy the mean-value property, The circle and disc mean-value properties).
For real one has , and for ; moreover and cosine is even (, , and , Double-angle and quadratic power-reduction identities, Sine is positive and cosine is strictly decreasing on (0,2), with cos 2 at most -1/3).
For nonnegative measurable one has , the integral is additive on nonnegative measurable summands, and holds exactly when -almost everywhere (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral, A nonnegative measurable function has integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere).
Verification
The data. By [L1] the arc is open with , because . Thus is a nonempty proper open arc, and its complement is a closed arc of measure with nonempty interior. Hence is a Borel function with , exactly on and exactly on , and for while and . The two endpoints of are ; they are the points with and do not belong to .
The chord bound. For one has : indeed by [L6], and with for gives since . Consequently, for all with , writing , and choosing with gives .
Local concentration of the kernel. Let and , and let with . For every with step 1.2 gives , hence , and therefore by [L2]. Thus as inside .
The extension and the strict bounds. The Poisson integral is defined, and [L2] gives for every . Since on and , the integral over is strictly positive: if it vanished, then -almost everywhere by [L7], contradicting positivity on the non-null set . Likewise on the non-null set , so ; additivity of the nonnegative integral over the disjoint union and the unit mass of [L3] therefore give . Hence for every , and is complex harmonic by [L4]; being real-valued, it is a real harmonic function.
The radial limit at an endpoint is one half. Let ; for the radial Poisson representation of [L2] and the integral formula of [L1] give , and translation invariance of moves the centre to , giving . Here the set in is . Split the integral over those two intervals and on the second put ; periodicity gives , so that piece equals . The linear substitutions are licensed by A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions; all integrands are bounded on these finite intervals, and interval endpoints have Lebesgue measure zero. Combining the pieces and then setting yields . By evenness of , . If , then lies in a fundamental interval , and its complement there stays at torus distance at least from ; [L3] therefore gives (with the complement empty when ). If , split into and the two extra intervals and . The fundamental interval has integral , while on the extra intervals the torus distance to is at least , so their integrals tend to by [L3]. Thus in either case and . The same computation at , using evenness, gives .
No two-sided limit of the indicator at an endpoint. Fix so large that . Then satisfies and so lies in , whereas satisfies and so lies in ; both sequences converge to as by continuity of . Hence and eventually, and has no limit at ; the same argument with applies to the other endpoint .
The bound. Since by [L2], the contraction inequality of [L4] and step 1.1 give for every and every .
The identity. For one has : the first equality is the torus normalization of [L1], and the second is the circle mean-value property [L5] applied to the real harmonic on the disc . For the identity gives the same value. Moreover because by [L2]. Since by step 2.2, for every .
The boundary limits at interior points. Let be an interior point of : then , and choosing with gives for every with by the triangle inequality for the circular distance; that is, and there. For with one then has , which tends to as by step 2.1. Hence as without restriction, and in particular nontangentially. If instead is an interior point of , choose with ; then on and the same estimate without the term gives , so .
Assembly. Step 2.2 gives the harmonic extension with ; steps 3.2 and 3.1 give the norm identities and ; step 3.3 gives the unrestricted, hence nontangential, boundary values on interior points of and on interior points of the complement; step 2.3 gives the radial limit at each endpoint, while step 2.4 shows that the chosen indicator representative has no two-sided pointwise limit at either endpoint. ∎
Depends on
- A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions
- Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral
- $\exp(x+iy)=e^x(\cos y+i\sin y)$, $|\exp(x+iy)|=e^x$, and $e^{i\pi}+1=0$
- The circle maximal function and nontangential approach regions
- Harmonic Hardy classes on the unit disc
- The circle and disc mean-value properties
- The Poisson integral of a finite complex boundary measure
- The Poisson kernel on the unit disc
- The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral
- The Poisson kernel is positive, has total mass one, and concentrates at a boundary point
- Sine is positive and cosine is strictly decreasing on (0,2), with cos 2 at most -1/3
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- Double-angle and quadratic power-reduction identities
- Plane harmonic functions satisfy the mean-value property
- A nonnegative measurable function has integral $0$ exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere
- Poisson extension is an Lp contraction and converges in finite Lp
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
118 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Axler, Bourdon and Ramey, Harmonic Function Theory, second edition, Chapter 6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Herbert Koch, Notes for Harmonic and Real Analysis (University of Bonn, 2014-15), Chapter 3 (standard reference, not scraped)