Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Poisson extension of an indicator arc

Example

Let 0<h<12 and ζ0∈T, let I:=Ih(ζ0) be the centred open arc of radius h, let f:=1I be its indicator and let u:=P[f] be the Poisson integral of f. Then:

  1. u is harmonic on D and 0<u(z)<1 for every z∈D;
  2. ∥ur∥L1(T,m)=m(I)=2h for every 0≤r<1, and ∥ur∥Lp(T,m)≤m(I)1/p for every 1≤p<∞;
  3. u(z)→1 as z→ζ for every interior point ζ of I, and u(z)→0 as z→ζ for every interior point ζ of T∖I; in particular the nontangential boundary value of u is 1 at interior points of I and 0 at interior points of the complement;
  4. at each of the two endpoints ζ± of I the radial limit is 12: u(rζ±)→12 as r↑1;
  5. the indicator f itself has no two-sided pointwise boundary limit at either endpoint.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice; a radius 0<h<12, a centre ζ0∈T written ζ0=φ([t0]), the arc I=Ih(ζ0), the indicator f=1I and u=P[f].

[L1]

The torus T=R/Z is identified with the Euclidean circle by the bijection φ([t])=e2πit, and m is the normalized Haar probability measure with ∫TF dm=∫01F(φ([t])) dt and translation invariance. The circular distance is d(ζ,η)=min⁡{∣s−t−k∣:k∈Z} for ζ=[t], η=[s]; for 0<h<12 the centred arc Ih(ζ)={η:d(ζ,η)<h} is open with m(Ih(ζ))=2h; and a complex-valued v on D has nontangential limit L at ζ whenever v(z)→L as z→ζ without restriction (The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral, The circle maximal function and nontangential approach regions).

[L2]

For f∈Lp(T,m), P[f](z)=∫TP(z,η)f(η) dm(η) with P(z,η)=(1−∣z∣2)/∣φ(η)−z∣2>0; the radial functions satisfy (Pr∗f)(ζ)=∫TPr(ζ−η)f(η) dm(η)=P[f](rζ) with Pr(u)=(1−r2)/(1−2rcos⁡(2πu)+r2), and Pr is even because cosine is even (The Poisson integral of a finite complex boundary measure, The Poisson kernel on the unit disc).

[L3]

For 0≤r<1 the Poisson kernel satisfies Pr(u)>0, 12π∫02πPr(θ) dθ=1, and for every δ∈(0,π] one has sup⁡δ≤∣θ∣≤πPr(θ)→0 as r↑1; in torus coordinates these say ∫TPr dm=1 and sup⁡{Pr(u):u∈T, d(u,0)≥δ}→0 for every δ>0 (The Poisson kernel is positive, has total mass one, and concentrates at a boundary point).

[L4]

If 1≤p≤∞ and f∈Lp(T,m), then P[f] is complex harmonic, lies in hp(D) and satisfies ∥ur∥Lp(T,m)=∥Pr∗f∥p≤∥f∥p for every 0≤r<1; a complex-valued function is harmonic exactly when its real and imaginary parts are real harmonic (Poisson extension is an Lp contraction and converges in finite Lp, Harmonic Hardy classes on the unit disc).

[L5]

A real harmonic function satisfies the circle mean-value property u(a)=12π∫02πu(a+teiθ) dθ on every closed disc contained in its domain (Plane harmonic functions satisfy the mean-value property, The circle and disc mean-value properties).

[L6]

For real x one has ∣e2πix−1∣2=2−2cos⁡(2πx)=4sin⁡2(πx), and sin⁡y≥y/3 for 0<y≤2; moreover ∣e2πix∣=1 and cosine is even (exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0, Double-angle and quadratic power-reduction identities, Sine is positive and cosine is strictly decreasing on (0,2), with cos 2 at most -1/3).

[L7]

For nonnegative measurable g one has ∫Tg dm≥0, the integral is additive on nonnegative measurable summands, and ∫Tg dm=0 holds exactly when g=0 m-almost everywhere (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral, A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1algebra

The data. By [L1] the arc I=Ih(ζ0) is open with m(I)=2h∈(0,1), because 0<h<12. Thus I is a nonempty proper open arc, and its complement is a closed arc of measure 1−2h>0 with nonempty interior. Hence f=1I is a Borel function with 0≤f≤1, f=1 exactly on I and f=0 exactly on T∖I, and ∥f∥Lpp=∫Tf dm=m(I) for 1≤p<∞ while ∥f∥∞=1 and ∥f∥1=m(I). The two endpoints of I are ζ±:=φ([t0±h]); they are the points with d(ζ0,ζ±)=h and do not belong to I.

1.2givenL1L6algebra

The chord bound. For ∣x∣≤12 one has ∣e2πix−1∣=2∣sin⁡(πx)∣≥2∣x∣: indeed ∣e2πix−1∣2=4sin⁡2(πx) by [L6], and π∣x∣≤π2<2 with sin⁡y≥y/3 for 0<y≤2 gives ∣sin⁡(πx)∣=sin⁡(π∣x∣)≥π∣x∣/3≥∣x∣ since π>3. Consequently, for all ζ,η∈T with d(ζ,η)≤12, writing ζ=φ([t]), η=φ([s]) and choosing k with ∣s−t−k∣=d(ζ,η) gives ∣φ(η)−φ(ζ)∣=∣e2πi(s−t−k)−1∣≥2 d(ζ,η).

2.1step 1.2L2algebra

Local concentration of the kernel. Let ζ∈T and 0<δ≤12, and let z∈D with ∣z−φ(ζ)∣≤δ. For every η∈T with d(η,ζ)≥δ step 1.2 gives ∣φ(η)−φ(ζ)∣≥2δ, hence ∣φ(η)−z∣≥∣φ(η)−φ(ζ)∣−∣φ(ζ)−z∣≥2δ−δ=δ, and therefore P(z,η)≤(1−∣z∣2)/δ2 by [L2]. Thus sup⁡{P(z,η):η∈T, d(η,ζ)≥δ}≤(1−∣z∣2)/δ2→0 as z→φ(ζ) inside D.

2.2step 1.1L2L3L4L7

The extension and the strict bounds. The Poisson integral u=P[f] is defined, and [L2] gives u(z)=∫TP(z,η)f(η) dm(η)=∫IP(z,η) dm(η) for every z∈D. Since P(z,⋅)>0 on T and m(I)>0, the integral over I is strictly positive: if it vanished, then P(z,⋅)1I=0 m-almost everywhere by [L7], contradicting positivity on the non-null set I. Likewise P(z,⋅)>0 on the non-null set T∖I, so ∫T∖IP(z,⋅) dm>0; additivity of the nonnegative integral over the disjoint union T=I⊔(T∖I) and the unit mass ∫TP(z,η) dm(η)=1 of [L3] therefore give u(z)=∫TP dm−∫T∖IP dm<1. Hence 0<u(z)<1 for every z∈D, and u is complex harmonic by [L4]; being real-valued, it is a real harmonic function.

2.3step 1.1L1L2L3algebra

The radial limit at an endpoint is one half. Let ζ+=φ([t0+h]); for 0≤r<1 the radial Poisson representation of [L2] and the integral formula of [L1] give u(rζ+)=∫01Pr(t0+h−τ)1{d([τ],[t0])<h} dτ, and translation invariance of m moves the centre to [0], giving ∫01Pr(h−s)1{d([s],[0])<h} ds. Here the set in [0,1) is [0,h)∪(1−h,1). Split the integral over those two intervals and on the second put v=s−1; periodicity gives Pr(h−s)=Pr(h−v), so that piece equals ∫−h0Pr(h−v) dv. The linear substitutions are licensed by A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions; all integrands are bounded on these finite intervals, and interval endpoints have Lebesgue measure zero. Combining the pieces and then setting w=h−s yields u(rζ+)=∫−hhPr(h−s) ds=∫02hPr(w) dw. By evenness of Pr, ∫02hPr=12∫−2h2hPr. If 2h≤12, then [−2h,2h] lies in a fundamental interval [−12,12], and its complement there stays at torus distance at least 2h>0 from 0; [L3] therefore gives ∫−2h2hPr→1 (with the complement empty when 2h=12). If 12<2h<1, split [−2h,2h] into [−12,12] and the two extra intervals [−2h,−12] and [12,2h]. The fundamental interval has integral 1, while on the extra intervals the torus distance to 0 is at least 1−2h>0, so their integrals tend to 0 by [L3]. Thus in either case ∫−2h2hPr→1 and u(rζ+)→12. The same computation at ζ−, using evenness, gives u(rζ−)→12.

2.4step 1.1L1algebra

No two-sided limit of the indicator at an endpoint. Fix m so large that 1m<min⁡{h,12−h}. Then ηm:=φ([t0+h−1m]) satisfies d(ζ0,ηm)=h−1m<h and so lies in I, whereas ηm′:=φ([t0+h+1m]) satisfies d(ζ0,ηm′)=h+1m>h and so lies in T∖I; both sequences converge to ζ+ as m→∞ by continuity of φ. Hence f(ηm)=1 and f(ηm′)=0 eventually, and f has no limit at ζ+; the same argument with t0−h applies to the other endpoint ζ−.

3.1step 1.1step 2.2L4

The Lp bound. Since ur=Pr∗f by [L2], the contraction inequality of [L4] and step 1.1 give ∥ur∥Lp(T,m)≤∥f∥Lp=m(I)1/p for every 1≤p<∞ and every 0≤r<1.

3.2step 1.1step 2.2L1L2L5

The L1 identity. For 0<r<1 one has ∫Tur dm=12π∫02πu(reiθ) dθ=u(0): the first equality is the torus normalization of [L1], and the second is the circle mean-value property [L5] applied to the real harmonic u on the disc D(0,r)‾⊆D. For r=0 the identity u0≡u(0) gives the same value. Moreover u(0)=∫IP(0,η) dm(η)=∫I1 dm=m(I) because P(0,η)=1 by [L2]. Since ur≥0 by step 2.2, ∥ur∥L1(T,m)=∫Tur dm=m(I)=2h for every 0≤r<1.

3.3step 2.1step 2.2L1L7algebra

The boundary limits at interior points. Let ζ be an interior point of I: then d(ζ0,ζ)<h, and choosing 0<δ<12 with d(ζ0,ζ)+δ<h gives d(ζ0,η)<h for every η with d(η,ζ)<δ by the triangle inequality for the circular distance; that is, Iδ(ζ)⊆I and f=1 there. For z∈D with ∣z−φ(ζ)∣≤δ one then has ∣u(z)−1∣=∣∫T(f(η)−1)P(z,η) dm(η)∣≤∫T∖Iδ(ζ)P(z,η) dm(η)≤sup⁡{P(z,η):d(η,ζ)≥δ}, which tends to 0 as z→φ(ζ) by step 2.1. Hence u(z)→1 as z→ζ without restriction, and in particular nontangentially. If instead ζ is an interior point of T∖I, choose δ with Iδ(ζ)∩I=∅; then f=0 on Iδ(ζ) and the same estimate without the term 1 gives ∣u(z)∣≤sup⁡{P(z,η):d(η,ζ)≥δ}→0, so u(z)→0.

4.1step 2.2step 3.1step 3.2step 2.3step 2.4step 3.3

Assembly. Step 2.2 gives the harmonic extension with 0<u<1; steps 3.2 and 3.1 give the norm identities ∥ur∥1=m(I) and ∥ur∥p≤m(I)1/p; step 3.3 gives the unrestricted, hence nontangential, boundary values 1 on interior points of I and 0 on interior points of the complement; step 2.3 gives the radial limit 12 at each endpoint, while step 2.4 shows that the chosen indicator representative f=1I has no two-sided pointwise limit at either endpoint. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

118 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources