How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Double-angle and quadratic power-reduction identities
Statement
For every real , and When defined, . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real .
Proof
Put in the addition formulas.
Use to rewrite the cosine identity and solve both resulting equalities for the squares.
Divide the double-angle sine identity by the double-angle cosine identity only when both quotient expressions are defined.
Depends on
Used by
- Known-amplitude amplification with integer rounding Algorithm
- A fixed Grover iteration count can fail when a is unknown Counterexample
- A radial Poisson limit does not control a tangential path Counterexample
- A real-valued optimum is not a fractional Grover iteration Counterexample
- I₂(5) admits no crystallographic scaling and no reduced crystallographic root system with that base pairing Counterexample
- A cycle and an overlong arm: explicit non-positive witnesses Example
- A moved-space intersection in A₃ that is not the meet Example
- A prepared state with success amplitude one half Example
- Addition and half-angle identities compute the sine, cosine, and tangent of π/12 Example
- All meets and joins of the right weak order of A₂ (S₃), with the left order and the inversion sets compared Example
- An indefinite Coxeter form: infinite, but not of affine type Example
- B-tilde versus C-tilde: the n=2 coincidence and the duality behind the difference Example
- Bₙ and Cₙ define the same Coxeter diagram and the same Coxeter group Example
- Exact Grover rotation for four addresses and one marked item Example
- Exact sine and cosine values at π/10, π/5, and 2π/5 Example
- G2 from I2(6): the scaled realization and its twelve roots Example
- Gram determinants and principal minors of the non-crystallographic types H₃ and H₄ Example
- Morrie's law: cos(π/9)cos(2π/9)cos(4π/9)=1/8 Example
- Ordered roots and the mu-dot-root matrix in I2(5) Example
- Path determinants dₖ=dₖ₋₁-cos²(π/m)dₖ₋₂ and the three-arm inequality Example
- Poisson extension of an indicator arc Example
- Simple and reflection lengths of a long transposition in S₅ Example
- The A₂ root and weight lattices: P/Q has order three Example
- The Pontryagin dual of the circle is ℤ Example
- The Rayleigh quotient on an interval Example
- The solid generated by rotating y=sin x on [0,π] has volume π²/2 Example
- The two-dimensional Taylor–Green vortex on the flat torus Example
- The Wall form and line restrictions of a plane rotation, and the necessity of a common upper bound Example
- Two independent units in a real cubic field Example
- A Quantitative Logarithm Near the Identity in SU(2) Lemma
- Average Grover success for a uniform integer iteration count Lemma
- Cartan-number products, allowed edge labels, tree scalings and reflection stability Lemma
- Classical Poincare products for A, B, D and I2(m) from the permutation and signed-permutation models Lemma
- Constant BBHT stage success beyond the threshold scale Lemma
- Enumeration of the connected positive semidefinite corank-one diagrams Lemma
- Exact zero-label probability for counting Lemma
- Exceptional parabolic-orbit length certificates for E6, E7, E8, F4, H3 and H4 Lemma
- Finite amplification preserves the good state with a deterministic call cap Lemma
- Finite capped amplification succeeds with a supplied lower bound Lemma
- Periodic heat-stencil eigenvalues and θ amplification factor Lemma
…and 22 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)