How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Harmonic Hardy classes on the unit disc
Definition
Assume countable choice. Identify the torus with the unit circle as in The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral, and write for its normalized Haar measure, a probability measure. For a function and write
A complex-valued function on is called harmonic when both components and are real-valued plane harmonic functions in the sense of Plane harmonic functions; this is the componentwise convention of Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions. Every such is continuous, because a real function is continuous and both components are of class .
The classes . For let where is regarded as an element of the quotient space of Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions through its continuous representative, and is the norm of Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm. For set Here the inner supremum may equivalently be read as the essential supremum of with respect to (The essential supremum of a measurable function with respect to a measure): a continuous function has the same supremum and essential supremum, because a nonempty open subset of contains the image of an open interval with (the map is open and its images of rational-endpoint intervals form a base, as proved in The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral), and such a set has -measure ; hence a continuous function bounded by almost everywhere is bounded by everywhere. In particular because every has the form with and .
The Hardy norms. For put Then is a complex vector space: harmonicity and finiteness of the suprema are preserved by finite linear combinations, and , for , by the corresponding statements at each radius in Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm. The assignment is definite: if , then , so almost everywhere, hence everywhere by continuity and the preceding paragraph; the Poisson representation formula A harmonic function is recovered from its values on any containing circle by the Poisson formula then gives on the disc , and the identity principle A plane harmonic function that vanishes on a nonempty open set vanishes everywhere on the domain, applied to the two components on the domain , gives . Thus is a norm on for every . No containment among the classes for is asserted here; only the containment will be used, and it is proved where it is needed.
Depends on
- Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The essential supremum of a measurable function with respect to a measure
- Plane harmonic functions
- The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral
- Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm
- A plane harmonic function that vanishes on a nonempty open set vanishes everywhere on the domain
- A harmonic function is recovered from its values on any containing circle by the Poisson formula
Used by
- Bounded harmonic functions have L-infinity Fatou boundary data Corollary
- A boundary atom gives an h1 function without an L1 density Example
- Poisson extension of an indicator arc Example
- h1 is isometric to finite regular complex boundary measures Theorem
- hᵖ is the Poisson image of Lp for 1<p<=infinity Theorem
- Poisson extension is an Lp contraction and converges in finite Lp Theorem
- Positive harmonic boundary measures and compact normalized families Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
82 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Axler, Bourdon and Ramey, Harmonic Function Theory, second edition, Chapter 6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Herbert Koch, Notes for Harmonic and Real Analysis (University of Bonn, 2014-15), Chapter 3 (standard reference, not scraped)