How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Riesz potential of order alpha
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice for the Euclidean Lebesgue framework (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Fix an integer and a real order , and work on with Lebesgue measure on the Lebesgue sigma-algebra (Lebesgue measurable sets, the family , and the restricted set function ).
The kernel. Put Since , the kernel is strictly positive and continuous on and has a singularity at the origin. The assigned value is a normalization convention: it changes the integrand only at the single point , which is the diagonal point of the domain; every statement in this pair is unchanged if another finite value is assigned instead, and the value at the origin is never used as a bound on the kernel everywhere.
The potential. Let be measurable, with real and imaginary parts measurable in the sense of Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals. The Riesz potential of order of is defined at a point precisely when the nonnegative integral is finite, and at every such point it is The integral displayed in the definition is the Lebesgue integral of the complex function , which is absolutely convergent exactly at the points where the first display holds; the value is then a complex number.
Scope of the definition. The set of points at which is defined may be empty, all of , or anything in between, and this definition asserts nothing about which case occurs: in particular it makes no claim that exists at every point, at almost every point, or for every belonging to any Lebesgue space. The strict-range theorem of this pair proves almost-everywhere absolute existence for every when .
Normalization. The unit normalization is fixed once and for all by in , the convention of both cited sources. A different positive constant rescales every potential and every estimate of this pair by that constant; no constant carrying a Fourier multiplier identity is asserted, and the identification of with a power of is not used here.
Depends on
Used by
- Strong fractional integration fails at p equal to one Counterexample
- The critical Riesz potential can diverge and be essentially unbounded Counterexample
- Dilation determines the Riesz-potential target exponent Example
- Hedberg pointwise inequality for Riesz potentials Lemma
- Near and far bounds for a Riesz potential Lemma
- Endpoint bounds require separate formulations Remark
- Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev fractional integration inequality Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mark Williams, Notes on Harmonic Analysis, §11.2, Proposition 11.4, printed p. 73 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Eleonor Harboure, Spaces of Smooth Functions, §1, printed p. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)