Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The complementarity product needs extra regularity

Statement refuted

Refuted: that for every open Ω⊆Rn, every u∈H1(Ω;R) and every nonnegative Radon measure μ on Ω (Radon measure on an LCH space, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms) the product u⋅μ is a well-defined distribution on Ω by the formula φ↦∫Ωuφ dμ. This is the unrestricted class-level product claim; the obstacle corollaries impose continuity or L2 representation to define their products (Obstacle complementarity in distribution form, The obstacle reaction is supported on the contact set under measure regularity).

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited from the ACL supplier. In dimension n=2 the function u(x)=log⁡log⁡(1/∣x∣), extended by a constant outside a neighbourhood of 0, lies in H1(B1/2(0)) but is unbounded near 0, so it has no continuous representative there. For the nonnegative Radon measure μ=δ0 the calculation of the pairing φ↦∫uφ dμ requires a representative and returns 0⋅φ(0) or 1⋅φ(0) for two representatives of the same class; changing the value at the single point 0 changes the result, so the product u⋅μ is not a well-defined distribution. In contrast, the multiplication of a distribution by a smooth function is well-defined (Multiplication of a distribution by a smooth function), because a smooth multiplier carries genuine pointwise values. The Dirac measure in this witness is not asserted to be the reaction of an obstacle solution; the witness refutes multiplication by arbitrary Radon measures from the Sobolev class alone.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, inherited from the ACL supplier, and the open ball B:=B1/2(0)⊆R2 (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space), the function u:B→R with u(x)=log⁡log⁡(1/∣x∣) for 0<∣x∣<1/4, u(x)=log⁡log⁡4 for 1/4≤∣x∣<1/2, and u(0):=0; the Dirac measure μ=δ0 on B (The Dirac set function at a point).

[F1]

Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma: the polar surface measure σ is a finite Borel measure on S1 and ∫R2f dλ2=∫0∞∫S1f(rω)r dσ(ω) dr for every Borel measurable f≥0; a radial integrand gives an inner integral r f(r) σ(S1).

[F2]

Change of variable in an improper integral, The improper p-test for rational exponents, Comparison tests for improper integrals, The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞: the monotone substitution r=e−t exchanges ∫01/4g(r) dr with ∫log⁡4∞g(e−t)e−t dt whenever either side converges; ∫1∞t−2 dt converges with value 1; and for every prescribed polynomial growth there is T0 with e2t≥t4 for t≥T0, so (log⁡t)2e−2t≤t−2 for large t because log⁡t≤t there.

[F4]

The ACL characterisation of W1,p, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions: a class in L2(Ω) lies in H1(Ω)=W1,2(Ω) if and only if it has a measurable ACL representative whose classical coordinate derivatives exist almost everywhere, are measurable, and lie in L2(Ω).

[F6]

Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure, Every at most countable subset of Rn is Lebesgue null; in particular λ1(Q)=0, Assuming countable choice, L(Rn) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λn is a complete measure extending elementary volume: a Euclidean ball has positive finite Lebesgue measure, singletons are Lebesgue-null, and Lebesgue measure is additive on disjoint measurable sets, so a punctured ball Bρ(0)∖{0} has positive measure.

[F7]

A Dirac set function is a probability measure, The Dirac set function at a point, A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes, Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure, Radon measure on an LCH space: δ0 is a probability measure on B with δ0({0})=1 and δ0(B∖{0})=0, so B∖{0} is δ0-null. For a finite-valued Borel measurable real or complex f, the function f−f(0) vanishes at 0 and its absolute value has integral 0 over B, by the null-set integral principle on B∖{0}. Thus f is δ0-integrable and ∫f dδ0=f(0)δ0(B)=f(0). It is a Radon measure: δ0(K)≤1 on compact sets, and for open U one has δ0(U)=1 if 0∈U (witnessed by the compact set {0}⊆U) and δ0(U)=0 otherwise, while for Borel E the same alternatives give outer regularity.

[F8]

Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization: there is φ∈Cc∞(B) with 0≤φ≤1 and φ=1 on a neighbourhood of 0, in particular φ(0)=1.

Counterexample

technique · direct

Given: The Axiom of Choice and the ball B=B1/2(0) and the function u of the setting above.

1.1given

The function u is continuous on B∖{0}: there ∣x∣ is continuous and positive, so x↦log⁡log⁡(1/∣x∣) is continuous on the punctured inner ball, and u equals the constant log⁡log⁡4 on the outer annulus, with matching limiting value at ∣x∣=1/4. Moreover log⁡log⁡(1/r)→+∞ as r↓0, because log⁡(1/r)→+∞ and log⁡s→+∞ as s→+∞; hence for every M there is ρ∈(0,1/4) with u(x)>M whenever 0<∣x∣<ρ.

1.2givenstep 1.1F1F2F3F6

For x≠0, rationalising the norm difference gives (∣x+tei∣−∣x∣)/t=(2xi+t)/(∣x+tei∣+∣x∣)→xi/∣x∣ as t→0, hence ∂i∣x∣=xi/∣x∣. On the punctured inner ball 0<∣x∣<1/4 the chain rule [F3] gives ∂iu(x)=ddrlog⁡log⁡(1/r)∣r=∣x∣⋅xi∣x∣=−xi∣x∣2log⁡(1/∣x∣), so ∣Du∣(x)=1∣x∣log⁡(1/∣x∣); on 1/4<∣x∣<1/2 the gradient vanishes. The joining circle is Lebesgue-null by [F1] applied to its indicator, since the radial integral is supported at r=1/4; the origin is null by [F6]. Define the gradient to be zero on these exceptional sets. By polar coordinates [F1], the substitution r=e−t [F2] and the convergence facts there, ∫Bu2 dx=σ(S1)∫01/4(log⁡log⁡(1/r))2 r dr+O(1)=σ(S1)∫log⁡4∞(log⁡t)2e−2t dt+O(1)<+∞, ∫B∣Du∣2 dx=σ(S1)∫01/4drrlog⁡2(1/r)=σ(S1)∫log⁡4∞t−2 dt=σ(S1)log⁡4<+∞, the first integral converging because (log⁡t)2e−2t≤t−2 for all large t and the remaining compact piece is finite. Hence u∈L2(B) and its classical gradient lies in L2(B).

2.1step 1.2F4

The function u is Borel measurable, since it is continuous on the open set B∖{0}; along almost every coordinate line — all lines except the single line through 0 in each of the two coordinate directions — the section is continuous and piecewise C1 with bounded derivatives on each compact subinterval away from 0 (the joining circle meets a coordinate line in at most two points), hence Lipschitz and absolutely continuous there, and the exceptional lines form a null set. By step 1.2 the classical coordinate derivatives exist almost everywhere, are measurable and lie in L2(B), so the ACL characterisation [F4] gives u∈H1(B) and identifies Du with the classical gradient almost everywhere.

2.2step 1.1F5F6

The class of u has no continuous representative. Suppose w:B→R were continuous with w=u almost everywhere. On the compact ball B‾1/8(0) the function w is bounded, say ∣w∣≤M [F5]. By step 1.1 choose ρ∈(0,1/8) with u(x)>M+1 for all 0<∣x∣<ρ; the punctured ball Bρ(0)∖{0} has positive Lebesgue measure [F6], so it contains a point x with w(x)=u(x)>M+1, contradicting ∣w∣≤M.

3.1step 2.1F4F6

The functions w1:=u and w2:=u+1{0} (that is, w2(0)=1 and w2(x)=u(x) for x≠0) are both representatives of the same L2 class, because they differ only on the Lebesgue-null singleton {0} [F6, F4].

4.1step 3.1F7F8

By [F7], μ=δ0 is a nonnegative Radon measure on the locally compact space B and ∫f dδ0=f(0); let φ∈Cc∞(B) with φ(0)=1 be the cutoff of [F8]. Evaluating the formula φ↦∫Buφ dμ with the representative w1 gives w1(0)φ(0)=0, while evaluating it with w2 gives w2(0)φ(0)=1; the two candidates differ by the nonzero distribution φ↦φ(0). Hence the formula is not independent of the representative of the H1 class, and no distribution u⋅μ is defined by it: the product is not a well-defined distribution of the class u alone.

5.1step 2.2step 4.1F7F8∎

Consequently an H1 class alone does not define its product with an arbitrary Radon measure. Sufficient hypotheses supplied by the obstacle corollaries are continuity of the representatives, as in The obstacle reaction is supported on the contact set under measure regularity, or the L2 representation of the reaction, as in clause 2 of Obstacle complementarity in distribution form; neither follows from u∈H1 (and the class here has no continuous representative by step 2.2). This contrasts with Multiplication of a distribution by a smooth function, where the multiplier is a genuine function and the product is representative-independent.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

178 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources