How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ambient-smooth density fails on a slit disc
Statement refuted
The smooth-up-to-the-boundary density conclusion of Ambient smooth restrictions are dense on bounded C^k domains cannot be extended from bounded domains to arbitrary bounded open sets. Assume the Axiom of Choice and let For every the branch belongs to , but there is no sequence of functions with . Thus the restrictions of globally smooth functions are not dense in on this bounded open set, although they are dense on every bounded domain. The two one-sided boundary values of on the slit differ by , and a globally smooth function has equal one-sided values, which is the obstruction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice; the bounded open slit disc ; the branch ; and .
Classical derivatives of functions are weak derivatives (Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives).
Membership in means membership of the class in together with weak first derivatives in , with finite- norm ; at the norm is the maximum of these three essential bounds (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
Polar coordinates: for Borel measurable (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
Tonelli–Fubini: for nonnegative measurable on a completed product, the double integral equals the iterated integrals; and is the completion of (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability, The Euclidean Lebesgue measure is the completion of the product of the factor Lebesgue measures).
Hölder's inequality: for conjugate exponents and integrable functions, (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
The density theorem: on a bounded domain with and , the restrictions of functions are dense in (Ambient smooth restrictions are dense on bounded C^k domains).
Integral over a measurable set: is the integral of (Integral over a measurable subset).
Choice use. The Axiom of Choice is assumed; the argument invokes it only through the Countable Choice declared by [F1] and through the choice-bearing product-measure and polar-coordinate interfaces [F3] and [F4]. The contradiction argument itself selects no family.
Counterexample
The set is open, because it is the intersection of the open disc with the open set , and it is bounded; the branch is of class on with and
Endpoint estimate. Let and let . For every the fundamental theorem gives , so , and [F5] applied to the two summands yields with ; the same estimate holds on for the endpoint .
Integrability. Since and has finite area, ; by [F3], [F7] and of step 1.1, because makes the one-dimensional integral converge at .
Membership. The function is on the open set , so by [F1] its classical partial derivatives of step 1.1 are its weak derivatives; by step 2.1 they lie in together with , and the membership criterion of [F2] gives for every .
Upper strip. Suppose satisfy . Fix and put . The function extends to the closed strip, with . For each , apply the endpoint estimate of step 1.2 to on each vertical section of and integrate in using [F4]. Since is fixed, its constant is fixed, and
Lower strip. On the function extends to the closed strip with . Applying step 1.2 to on each vertical section and integrating in gives, for the same fixed ,
Contradiction. For every the elementary inequality holds pointwise on , so by steps 4.1 and 4.2, which is impossible since .
Therefore no sequence of globally smooth functions converges to in for any , so ambient smooth restrictions are not dense on this bounded open set. By contrast [F6] gives that density for every bounded domain, so the conclusion cannot be extended to arbitrary open sets. Indeed is not a bounded domain in the graph sense: near a slit point with , its complement is only a line segment and has empty interior, so is dense on both sides of that segment. A one-sided graph domain has a nonempty open complementary side in every sufficiently small chart neighbourhood, which rules out such a chart here.
Depends on
- Ambient smooth restrictions are dense on bounded C^k domains
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability
- The Euclidean Lebesgue measure is the completion of the product of the factor Lebesgue measures
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
- Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives
- Integral over a measurable subset
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (2026), Lemma 1.14 and §1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard S. Laugesen, Linear Analysis and Partial Differential Equations (2020), §3.6 (standard reference, not scraped)