Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One centred ball-mean identity does not force harmonicity

Statement refuted

One ball-mean identity at one centre forces harmonicity.

Counterexample

Given: n1, R>0, and u:RnR defined by u(x)=x2(x2n+2n+4R2).

1.1

Polar coordinates Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma give 1BRBRx2=nn+2R2 and 1BRBRx4=nn+4R4, hence 1BRBRu=0=u(0) [given, algebra].

2.1

Yet Δu=4(n+2)x22nn+2n+4R2, which is not identically zero [given, algebra]. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources