How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Distributional harmonicity removes an apparent interior corner
Example
Let and define by . This apparent corner is not distributionally harmonic on ; indeed . Thus a distributionally harmonic locally integrable function has a unique smooth harmonic representative; in particular, the actual corner cannot be distributionally harmonic on any open set meeting the hyperplane .
Verification
Given: , the domain , and the distributional derivative convention Distributional harmonicity and Poisson's equation on an open subset of Rn.
In one variable, integrating by parts twice gives ; tensoring with the remaining variables gives the stated hyperplane term [given].
Conversely Weyl's lemma for the Laplacian gives every distributionally harmonic distribution a smooth representative [step 1.1]. ∎
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- PDE source treatment (standard reference, not scraped)