Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A power weight fails at both A_p endpoints

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Fix 1<p<∞. The claims that the power weight ∣x∣α is in Ap also at the endpoints of its admissible interval are false:

  1. at the upper endpoint α=n(p−1) the function ∣x∣α is a weight but not an Ap weight;
  2. at the lower endpoint α=−n the function ∣x∣α is not even locally integrable, so it is not a weight.

Hence the admissible interval −n<α<n(p−1) is open at both ends and cannot be enlarged.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; n≥1, 1<p<∞, the power function ∣x∣α and a radius R>0.

[F1]

For α>−n the function ∣x∣α is a weight, and the Ap characteristic is the supremum of ⟨w⟩Q⟨w−1/(p−1)⟩Qp−1 over cubes (The A_p range of a power weight, Muckenhoupt A_p and A_1 weights, Weights, their associated measures, and the spaces L^p(w)).

[F2]

Polar coordinates give ∫B(0,R)∣x∣a dx=∣Sn−1∣Rn+a/(n+a) for a>−n and +∞ for a≤−n, and ∫0Rr−1dr=+∞ for every R>0 (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers, The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t, Comparison tests for improper integrals).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F1F2givenalgebra

At the upper endpoint: for α=n(p−1) one has −α/(p−1)=−n, so polar coordinates give ∫B(0,R)∣x∣−α/(p−1)dx=∫B(0,R)∣x∣−ndx=∣Sn−1∣∫0Rr−1dr=+∞ for every R>0 by the logarithmic divergence of ∫01r−1dr. The second factor of the defining product ⟨∣x∣α⟩Q⟨∣x∣−α/(p−1)⟩Qp−1 is therefore +∞ on the cube Q=Q(0,R) containing B(0,R), so the defining supremum is +∞ and ∣x∣n(p−1) is not in Ap, while it is locally integrable and hence a weight.

1.2F2givenalgebra

At the lower endpoint: for α=−n polar coordinates give ∫B(0,R)∣x∣−ndx=∣Sn−1∣∫0Rr−1dr=+∞, so ∣x∣−n∉Lloc1(Rn) and no Ap membership is defined; this is the same logarithmic divergence of the radial integral ∫0Rr−1dr.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2given∎

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 show the failure at both endpoints, so the range −n<α<n(p−1) determined in The A_p range of a power weight is exactly the open admissible interval and cannot be enlarged.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources