How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Irreducible characters are orthonormal class functions
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a compact Lie group with normalized Haar measure . The characters of pairwise inequivalent irreducible unitary finite-dimensional complex representations of are orthonormal in , and every such character is a conjugation-invariant class function.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume the Axiom of Choice, a compact Lie group with normalized Haar measure , and irreducible unitary representations chosen from a family containing one representative of each equivalence class, with characters . Thus either with the same chosen model and basis, or and are inequivalent.
The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice; it enters through the normalized Haar measure and the Schur-orthogonality supplier [L1]. The finite-sum linearity statement [L3] is choice-free.
Schur orthogonality with respect to the matrix coefficient functions fixed on this page gives for inequivalent irreducible . For equivalent models and an intertwining isomorphism , the integral is ; in the equal-model, equal-basis case used below, and this specializes to (Schur orthogonality).
The character is in an orthonormal basis, is independent of that basis, and is a class function: for all (Matrix coefficients and characters).
The integral of a finite sum of integrable functions is the sum of the integrals (The Lebesgue integral is linear on ).
Proof
Expanding both characters by [L2] and using linearity of the integral [L3], , a finite sum of the orthogonality integrals of [L1].
If and are inequivalent, every term in step 1.1 vanishes by the first case of [L1], so . If , then the terms equal by the second case of [L1] with and , so .
Conjugation invariance is [L2], so every character is a class function; combining with step 2.1, the characters of pairwise inequivalent irreducible unitary representations are orthonormal in . The Axiom of Choice entered only through the Haar-based supplier [L1].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Kirillov Jr., An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)