How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Predictable quadratic variation in discrete time
Definition
Assume AC The Axiom of Choice. For a real martingale Martingale submartingale and supermartingale with at every time, its predictable quadratic variation is Here conditional expectations denote the classes of Conditional expectation as an ae class. To obtain a process of versions, note first that has a measurable square Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined and Choose a finite real integrable -measurable version of for each . Conditional positivity Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation gives a.s. Replace by : this is measurable for the same sigma-algebra and changes it only on its own measurable null set. Use these nonnegative versions in the finite sum.
For the finite-integral interface, augment every finite disjoint display of a nonnegative simple function by the complement with coefficient . Intersections of two augmented displays partition the space and carry equal coefficients wherever nonempty, so finite additivity and prove representation independence. Common refinements give simple addition and monotonicity; scalar zero is direct and positive scalars are termwise. Taking suprema over simple minorants, using increasing simple approximations and the sets for , gives monotone convergence and nonnegative additivity. Positive/negative and real/imaginary decompositions give finite linearity. Substituting this repair at the foundation also validates the event-integral RN construction used by the cited conditional-expectation class and its positivity.
Every with is -measurable; therefore is predictable Predictable discrete time process. The locally reconstructed finite linearity gives integrability. The chosen version has nonnegative increments at every point, and any other measurable versions define the same class at each time. AC is used in the supplied RN existence and in selecting the countable family of versions.
The optional quadratic sum is instead It too is integrable, adapted and increasing by the same square bound and finite-sum argument. Its summands are only required to be -measurable; predictability or equality to is not part of this definition. Neither sum includes a term .
Depends on
- Martingale submartingale and supermartingale
- Predictable discrete time process
- Conditional expectation as an ae class
- Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation
- The Lebesgue integral is linear on $L^1(\mu)$
- Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, fifth edition (standard reference, not scraped)