How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An integral constraint and its constant multiplier
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited from the trace and Hilbert multiplier suppliers. On minimise over subject to the integral constraint , where . The minimiser is and the Lagrange multiplier of The Lagrange multiplier rule for one regular constraint in Hilbert space, in the convention with , is the constant .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a real number , the space with its weak derivative and norm (The notation and the reserved zero-boundary symbol, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure), the functional and the constraint .
The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice: the assumed Axiom of Choice supplies Dependent and Countable Choice for the integration and trace suppliers.
is a Hilbert space under the derivative-sum inner product, A closed subspace of a Banach space is Banach, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure, Endpoint trace commutes with Sobolev truncation on an interval, One-dimensional functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives: for and , the endpoint trace is well defined and ; the closure defining is a closed linear subspace of the real Hilbert space , hence complete for the restricted derivative-sum inner product and itself a real Hilbert space; a class in has an absolutely continuous representative on with at both endpoints and with almost everywhere.
Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives: a function on has its classical derivative as weak derivative; in particular and the affine function are weakly differentiable with and .
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then , For a natural the function is differentiable everywhere with derivative ; for it is the constant , with derivative ; for a natural the function is differentiable at every with derivative ; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The Lebesgue integral is linear on : the fundamental theorem of calculus applied to the antiderivatives and , whose derivatives are and , gives and , and the integral is linear, so .
Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions: for absolutely continuous on , .
Fréchet derivative between Banach spaces, Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases: for one has , and ; hence with . Similarly is continuous affine, with bounded linear derivative for every , and , so is with this derivative at every point.
The Lagrange multiplier rule for one regular constraint in Hilbert space: if is a local minimiser of on the level set and , then there is a unique with .
Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions: an absolutely continuous function whose derivative vanishes almost everywhere is constant.
Verification
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the number , the function on , and the functionals and above.
The polynomial is smooth on with ; its class on is absolutely continuous with weak derivative by [F2], and its endpoint trace vanishes, so by [F1]. Moreover by [F3], so is admissible.
For every the derivative formulae are and by [F5]; in particular is a nonzero bounded functional, because by step 1.1, so the constraint is regular.
We compute for every : by [F1] the absolutely continuous representative vanishes at both endpoints and , so [F4] applied to and gives ; multiplying by gives , hence the displayed identity. Thus .
Let satisfy the constraint ; then by step 1.1, and [F5] gives by step 3.1, because ; hence , with equality exactly when .
If , then has weak derivative , so its absolutely continuous representative is constant by [F7] and [F1]; that constant is because has vanishing trace, so and . Therefore is the unique admissible minimiser, in particular a local minimiser, and the multiplier rule [F6] applies with the regular constraint ; comparing its conclusion with the identity of step 3.1 and the fact that gives the unique multiplier . This proves the example.
Depends on
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- The Axiom of Choice
- A closed subspace of a Banach space is Banach
- $H^k$ is a Hilbert space under the derivative-sum inner product
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions
- One-dimensional $W^{1,p}$ functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives
- Fréchet derivative between Banach spaces
- The notation $H^k$ and the reserved zero-boundary symbol
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
- For a natural $n \ge 1$ the function $x \mapsto x^{n}$ is differentiable everywhere with derivative $\iota(n)\,x^{\,n-1}$; for $n = 0$ it is the constant $1$, with derivative $0$; for a natural $n \ge 1$ the function $x \mapsto x^{-n}$ is differentiable at every $x \ne 0$ with derivative $-\iota(n)\,x^{-n-1}$; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term
- Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives
- Endpoint trace commutes with Sobolev truncation on an interval
- The Lagrange multiplier rule for one regular constraint in Hilbert space
- Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions
- Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: $(f+g)'(c) = f'(c) + g'(c)$, $(\alpha f)'(c) = \alpha f'(c)$, $(fg)'(c) = f'(c)g(c) + f(c)g'(c)$, and $(f/g)'(c) = \bigl(f'(c)g(c) - f(c)g'(c)\bigr)/g(c)^{2}$ when $g(c) \ne 0$
- The second fundamental theorem: if $G$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ with $G' = f$ and $f$ is integrable, then $\int_a^b f = G(b)-G(a)$
- The Lebesgue integral is linear on $L^1(\mu)$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
116 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Riccardo Cristoferi, Calculus of Variations: Lecture Notes, Carnegie Mellon University 2016 (complete 133-page notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2026 author manuscript; complete 392-page archived text) (standard reference, not scraped)