Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonnegative predictable transforms preserve submartingale gains

Statement

Assume AC. Let X be a submartingale and H a finite nonnegative predictable process. If EHk(XkXk1)< for every k1, then HX is a submartingale starting at zero. In particular the conclusion holds for timewise bounded nonnegative H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and conventions in the statement.

[F1]

The product hypothesis gives adapted integrable sums, and timewise bounds suffice. Discrete martingale transform.

[F2]

A finite measurable factor may be taken out when its product with the integrable input is integrable. Taking out what is known.

[F3]

Conditional expectation is linear, order preserving and expectation preserving. Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation.

[F4]

An integrable variable measurable for the conditioning sigma-algebra conditions to itself. Conditioning a known variable and an independent variable.

[F5]

AC supplies the inherited conditional-expectation existence and any stated choice of versions. The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Set Z=HX and dk=E[XkXk1Fk1]. By the transform domain Z is adapted and integrable with Z0=0. Linearity and the known-variable identity give dk=E[XkFk1]Xk10 a.s. by the submartingale hypothesis Martingale submartingale and supermartingale.

givenF1F3F4
2.1

Apply [F2] with input XkXk1 and finite known factor Hk. The input and its product are integrable, so [F2] also guarantees HkdkL1 and gives E[ZkZk1Fk1]=Hkdk0 a.s. Adding the known Zk1 yields E[ZkFk1]Zk1 for every k1. For timewise bounds, [F1] verifies the product hypothesis. AC is inherited from the conditional classes; no positivity of X or boundedness of an unbounded H is inferred.

givenF1F2F3F4F5step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources