How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nonnegative predictable transforms preserve submartingale gains
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a submartingale and a finite nonnegative predictable process. If for every , then is a submartingale starting at zero. In particular the conclusion holds for timewise bounded nonnegative .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and conventions in the statement.
The product hypothesis gives adapted integrable sums, and timewise bounds suffice. Discrete martingale transform.
A finite measurable factor may be taken out when its product with the integrable input is integrable. Taking out what is known.
Conditional expectation is linear, order preserving and expectation preserving. Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation.
An integrable variable measurable for the conditioning sigma-algebra conditions to itself. Conditioning a known variable and an independent variable.
AC supplies the inherited conditional-expectation existence and any stated choice of versions. The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
Set and . By the transform domain is adapted and integrable with . Linearity and the known-variable identity give a.s. by the submartingale hypothesis Martingale submartingale and supermartingale.
Apply [F2] with input and finite known factor . The input and its product are integrable, so [F2] also guarantees and gives a.s. Adding the known yields for every . For timewise bounds, [F1] verifies the product hypothesis. AC is inherited from the conditional classes; no positivity of or boundedness of an unbounded is inferred.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, fifth edition (standard reference, not scraped)