How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Two Radon-Nikodym derivatives can differ on a null set
Statement refuted
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. The Radon-Nikodym derivative is a uniquely determined function.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice, the zero measure on , and the Cantor set .
The Cantor set is Lebesgue measurable and Lebesgue null. (The Cantor set is an uncountable subset of of Lebesgue measure zero)
The integral of a nonnegative function over a null set vanishes. (A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes)
A Radon-Nikodym derivative is only an almost-everywhere equivalence class of representing functions. (The Radon-Nikodym derivative as an almost-everywhere equivalence class)
Counterexample
Let and . For every measurable set , [L1] and [L2] give Thus both and represent the zero measure relative to .
The functions and are not equal pointwise because on , but [L3] says only almost-everywhere equality is required. Hence pointwise uniqueness fails.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.