How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conditional monotone convergence
Statement
Assume AC. For nonnegative measurable (possibly infinite), is the unique almost-sure class of nonnegative -measurable satisfying for every . If almost surely, then almost surely. Every increasing integrable nonnegative approximation to gives the same class. For integrable real almost surely with , almost surely.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and nonnegative measurable inputs X and almost surely; for the decreasing clause, real with .
The extended version is the increasing truncation limit. (Conditional expectation for nonnegative variables)
Integrable versions preserve order and finite linear combinations. (Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation)
Ordinary MCT applies to nonnegative increasing functions. (Monotone convergence for the integral)
Positive/negative parts, level sets and increasing limits are measurable. (Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral)
Integrals of nonnegative functions on measurable null sets vanish. (A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes)
AC selects countably many versions and covers inherited existence choices. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
For the ordered nonnegative versions of [F1], ordinary MCT on each event gives . Changes on the common measurable null set have zero event integral by [F5]. Thus the limit has the stated event characterization. If inputs are changed almost surely, their nonnegative integrals also agree by splitting each event into its part in and outside the measurable exceptional null set.
For uniqueness, let be two characterized versions and set for positive integers . This is in : the difference is formed only on the finite-Z set. On , , and the event identities give . Integration of there yields . Their countable union is , since strict extended inequality forces the smaller value to be finite. Thus ; interchanging the two variables gives equality almost surely. No infinite integrals are subtracted.
More generally, if almost surely and are their characterized versions, then on all events. On the same as in step 2.1, the right integral is finite and the inequality forces . Thus almost surely. This extends order to the nonnegative classes, including infinite values.
Choose versions for the given using [F6]. By step 3.1 remove one -null union of consecutive order-exception sets and set all to zero there. Their limit is measurable by [F4]. MCT and the event identities give . For almost-sure input monotonicity the common ambient measurable null set can be removed from the inputs using [F5]; this does not require that set to belong to . Step 2.1 now identifies with . The same argument works for any increasing integrable nonnegative approximations.
Finally almost surely, and all these variables are integrable because . Apply step 4.1 and linearity [F2] to obtain . The fixed first term is finite almost surely, so subtraction gives the claimed decreasing convergence.
Source notes
Van der Vaart Lemma 1.10(i), printed p.4; Durrett Theorem 4.1.9(c) and its decreasing-limit remark, printed pp.210–211. Extended uniqueness and order are supplied locally by finite-level localization; the decreasing clause preserves the coverage promise.
Depends on
- Conditional expectation for nonnegative variables
- Conditional expectation is unique almost surely
- Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral
- The Axiom of Choice
- A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes
Used by
- Conditional fatou and dominated convergence Theorem
- Conditional integration through a regular conditional law Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Conditional expectation for nonnegative variables.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, 5th ed. (standard reference, not scraped)