Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Law of the Brownian maximum

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, let B be a standard Brownian motion Brownian motion. Use the everywhere-continuous, zero-start representative fixed in Brownian reflection principle: replace the path by zero outside a measurable probability-one event of continuity and zero start, retaining the notation B. Let t>0 and Mt:=sup⁡0≤s≤tBs. This is a finite nonnegative random variable: continuity gives boundedness on [0,t] and identifies its supremum with the supremum over the countable dense set (Q∩[0,t])∪{t}. With Φ the standard normal distribution function, Φ(x)=N(0,1)((−∞,x]) Standard normal and normal laws Cumulative distribution function of a real random variable, one has for every x≥0 P(Mt≤x)=2Φ ⁣(xt)−1. Consequently Mt has the same law as ∣Bt∣, and on x>0 the law of Mt has the density f(x)=2πt exp⁡ ⁣(−x22t).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a standard Brownian motion B in the stated everywhere-continuous zero-start representative, t>0 and x≥0.

[F1]

P(Mt≥a)=2P(Bt≥a) for every a>0, and Mt≥a  ⟺  sup⁡[0,t]B≥a. Brownian reflection principle

[F2]

The law of Bt is N(0,t), the law of tZ for a standard normal Z, whose density is φ(y)=e−y2/2/2π; hence P(a≤Bt≤b)=∫abφ(y/t) t−1/2dy for a<b and P(Bt=c)=0. The Brownian kernels form a semigroup Standard normal and normal laws

[F4]

A probability measure on R is determined by its distribution function on the intervals (−∞,x]; this uses countable choice, which AC supplies. Probability laws correspond to distribution functions The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) The Axiom of Choice

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3given

For x≥0 and positive integers n, put an=x+1/n>0. The events {Mt≥an} increase to {Mt>x}, and {Bt≥an} increase to {Bt>x}. Applying [F3] to their indicators and [F1] at each an gives P(Mt>x)=2P(Bt>x). (To use an index starting at zero, replace n by n+1.) By [F2], P(Bt>x)=1−Φ(x/t). Taking complements yields the asserted formula for every x≥0, including x=0 since the even normal density has mass one and no atom, so Φ(0)=1/2.

1.2F2F3

Define G(x):=∫0xf(y) dy for x≥0 with f(y)=2/(πt)e−y2/(2t). The substitution y=t u, applied to the continuous integrand on [0,x], gives G(x)=2(Φ(x/t)−Φ(0))=2Φ(x/t)−1 for every x>0: indeed f(tu)t=2φ(u). For x≥0, the bound 0≤G(x)≤2/(πt)x gives G(0+)=0, and the same computation with the upper limit tending to +∞, together with lim⁡u→∞Φ(u)=1, gives ∫0∞f=1.

2.1F2F4step 1.1

For x≥0, P(∣Bt∣≤x)=P(−x≤Bt≤x)=Φ(x/t)−Φ(−x/t)=2Φ(x/t)−1 by the symmetry Φ(−u)=1−Φ(u) of the standard normal law, which follows from the symmetry of its density φ; for x<0 both P(Mt≤x) and P(∣Bt∣≤x) vanish. Since the two distribution functions agree on all of R, [F4] identifies the laws, so Mt and ∣Bt∣ have the same law.

2.2F4step 1.1step 1.2

The measure with density f on (0,∞), extended by zero on (−∞,0], is a probability measure whose distribution function at x≥0 is G(x)=2Φ(x/t)−1 and at x<0 is 0; by [F4] it therefore equals the law of Mt. Hence the law of Mt has the density f on x>0 and no atom at 0.

3.1F2F4givenstep 1.2∎

The cases x=0 and t>0 are included in steps 1.1 and 2.2; the strict-tail identity was obtained by increasing indicator limits in step 1.1, and atomlessness of the maximum follows from its density in step 2.2. Countable choice in the Riemann–Lebesgue bridge and [F4] is supplied by the assumed AC.

Source notes

Lawler, Proposition 2.7.2, supplies the reflection-based maximum formula. The strict tail is derived here by increasing indicator limits, including the endpoint zero. The density is identified through compact-interval substitution, the Riemann–Lebesgue bridge, and equality of distribution functions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources