Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Law of the Brownian maximum

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, let B be a standard Brownian motion Brownian motion. Use the everywhere-continuous, zero-start representative fixed in Brownian reflection principle: replace the path by zero outside a measurable probability-one event of continuity and zero start, retaining the notation B. Let t>0 and Mt:=sup0stBs. This is a finite nonnegative random variable: continuity gives boundedness on [0,t] and identifies its supremum with the supremum over the countable dense set (Q[0,t]){t}. With Φ the standard normal distribution function, Φ(x)=N(0,1)((,x]) Standard normal and normal laws Cumulative distribution function of a real random variable, one has for every x0 P(Mtx)=2Φ ⁣(xt)1. Consequently Mt has the same law as Bt, and on x>0 the law of Mt has the density f(x)=2πtexp ⁣(x22t).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a standard Brownian motion B in the stated everywhere-continuous zero-start representative, t>0 and x0.

[F1]

P(Mta)=2P(Bta) for every a>0, and Mta    sup[0,t]Ba. Brownian reflection principle

[F2]

The law of Bt is N(0,t), the law of tZ for a standard normal Z, whose density is φ(y)=ey2/2/2π; hence P(aBtb)=abφ(y/t)t1/2dy for a<b and P(Bt=c)=0. The Brownian kernels form a semigroup Standard normal and normal laws

[F4]

A probability measure on R is determined by its distribution function on the intervals (,x]; this uses countable choice, which AC supplies. Probability laws correspond to distribution functions The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) The Axiom of Choice

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For x0 and positive integers n, put an=x+1/n>0. The events {Mtan} increase to {Mt>x}, and {Btan} increase to {Bt>x}. Applying [F3] to their indicators and [F1] at each an gives P(Mt>x)=2P(Bt>x). (To use an index starting at zero, replace n by n+1.) By [F2], P(Bt>x)=1Φ(x/t). Taking complements yields the asserted formula for every x0, including x=0 since the even normal density has mass one and no atom, so Φ(0)=1/2.

F1F2F3given
1.2

Define G(x):=0xf(y)dy for x0 with f(y)=2/(πt)ey2/(2t). The substitution y=tu, applied to the continuous integrand on [0,x], gives G(x)=2(Φ(x/t)Φ(0))=2Φ(x/t)1 for every x>0: indeed f(tu)t=2φ(u). For x0, the bound 0G(x)2/(πt)x gives G(0+)=0, and the same computation with the upper limit tending to +, together with limuΦ(u)=1, gives 0f=1.

F2F3
2.1

For x0, P(Btx)=P(xBtx)=Φ(x/t)Φ(x/t)=2Φ(x/t)1 by the symmetry Φ(u)=1Φ(u) of the standard normal law, which follows from the symmetry of its density φ; for x<0 both P(Mtx) and P(Btx) vanish. Since the two distribution functions agree on all of R, [F4] identifies the laws, so Mt and Bt have the same law.

F2F4step 1.1
2.2

The measure with density f on (0,), extended by zero on (,0], is a probability measure whose distribution function at x0 is G(x)=2Φ(x/t)1 and at x<0 is 0; by [F4] it therefore equals the law of Mt. Hence the law of Mt has the density f on x>0 and no atom at 0.

F4step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

The cases x=0 and t>0 are included in steps 1.1 and 2.2; the strict-tail identity was obtained by increasing indicator limits in step 1.1, and atomlessness of the maximum follows from its density in step 2.2. Countable choice in the Riemann–Lebesgue bridge and [F4] is supplied by the assumed AC.

F2F4givenstep 1.2

Source notes

Lawler, Proposition 2.7.2, supplies the reflection-based maximum formula. The strict tail is derived here by increasing indicator limits, including the endpoint zero. The density is identified through compact-interval substitution, the Riemann–Lebesgue bridge, and equality of distribution functions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources