How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Maximum crossing before a fixed time
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice and let be a standard Brownian motion Brownian motion. Use the everywhere-continuous, zero-start representative fixed in Law of the Brownian maximum: replace the path by zero outside a measurable probability-one event of continuity and zero start, retaining the notation . Let . This is a finite measurable random variable because its continuous-path supremum on equals the supremum over . For and , where is the standard normal distribution function Standard normal and normal laws Cumulative distribution function of a real random variable. The value tends to as and to as ; at fixed, the probability is decreasing in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a standard Brownian motion in the stated everywhere-continuous zero-start representative, and reals , .
for , and the law of is atomless; hence and . Law of the Brownian maximum
, , and is continuous and nondecreasing. Standard normal and normal laws Cumulative distribution function of a real random variable
AC is the standing hypothesis under which the Brownian maximum and normal-law interfaces in [F1]-[F2] are supplied; this example makes no additional selection. The Axiom of Choice
Verification
By [F1], for every and , which is the displayed value.
As one has , so continuity of at with gives ; as one has and , so the value tends to . Since is nondecreasing, the value is nonincreasing in .
The boundary cases are consistent: at the formula would give , while the stated range is ; the case is essential because the normalization uses a positive square root. AC is used only through [F3].
Source notes
Durrett, Section 7.4, records the crossing probability as the reflection consequence; the example adds the two limiting checks explicitly.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Rick Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, fifth edition, Section 7.4 (standard reference, not scraped)