How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Brownian p-variation threshold
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (hence Countable Choice). The convention for supremal -variation is fixed here. For a continuous and a real put the supremum running over all partitions of in the sense of Partition of as a finite strictly increasing list , its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions, and declared when the set of sums is unbounded above. For a standard Brownian motion Brownian motion, almost surely on every nondegenerate compact interval : The threshold exponent is therefore , and the example keeps the supremal two-variation distinct from the dyadic quadratic sums of Brownian quadratic variation on dyadic partitions, which, for each fixed deterministic interval, converge almost surely to . This last assertion has its own fixed-interval null set; no simultaneous uncountable family of dyadic convergence claims is asserted. For the proof use the version obtained by keeping on its one measurable continuity-and-zero-start event and replacing the whole path by zero outside it Brownian motion has a jointly measurable continuous version. The simultaneous variation conclusion transfers to the original process on that same event.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, AC, a standard Brownian motion with its all-path continuous jointly measurable version, rationals , and the notation above.
Almost surely there is one event on which every path is continuous and, for every and , a finite bounds on . Brownian paths are locally Holder below one half Brownian motion has a jointly measurable continuous version
For each fixed , the dyadic squared-increment sums on converge almost surely to . Application to a shifted Brownian motion will be justified in step 1.4. Almost surely total variation is infinite on every nondegenerate compact interval. Brownian quadratic variation on dyadic partitions Brownian paths have infinite total variation
Almost surely , and the shifted increment process is again a standard Brownian motion, so the same statement holds for every fixed deterministic . Brownian law of the iterated logarithm at zero Brownian motion
Every finite-valued nondecreasing function on a compact interval is differentiable with finite derivative at Lebesgue-almost every interior point. The monotone-differentiability interface assumes AC; no integral representation or continuity of accumulated variation is needed. A monotone function is differentiable almost everywhere by the rising-sun route The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Fubini applies to the indicator of a product-measurable set on , so its -section lengths integrate to its product measure. Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product Brownian motion has a jointly measurable continuous version
A continuous real function on a compact interval is uniformly continuous. Partitions are finite increasing endpoint lists. Heine-Cantor in : a continuous real function on a compact subset of is uniformly continuous, proved -natively from sequential compactness Partition of as a finite strictly increasing list , its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions
The rationals are dense in ; AC is the ambient assumption of the Brownian interfaces. The rationals embed densely in the reals The Axiom of Choice
Verification
If is constant all its variation sums are zero, and if the comparison is equality. Otherwise fix a nonconstant continuous on with finite oscillation , and let ; for every partition, , so taking suprema gives ; consequently implies and implies .
Suppose that for some continuous on and some one had ; then for the dyadic partition with mesh one has , and the maximum increment tends to by uniform continuity of the continuous on the compact , so those quadratic sums would tend to .
Suppose now that a continuous on satisfies , and put and for ; then is nondecreasing and finite-valued, and for , with one has by adding the single point to partitions of and taking suprema.
For each fixed deterministic the process , , starts at zero and has continuous paths. Its increments on disjoint -intervals are increments of on disjoint time-translated intervals, so they have the independent centered normal laws with the required lengths. Thus is standard Brownian motion. Applying [F2] to with and identifies its dyadic sums term by term with those on and proves their almost-sure limit for each fixed interval. Applying [F3] to at each fixed gives almost surely: along a sequence where the LIL ratio is at least , that quotient is at least .
Let be rational and choose a rational with ; by [F1] there is, on a probability-one event, a finite with on ; then for every partition of , because and ; hence almost surely.
But by step 1.4 the dyadic quadratic sums of the Brownian path converge to almost surely, so the hypothesis of [step 1.2] fails for on every rational interval and rational almost surely; intersecting countably many events and using [step 1.1] to pass to every real gives almost surely for every and every nondegenerate compact interval.
By [F4] the function is differentiable at Lebesgue-almost every with finite derivative, so at those one has .
Let ; the set is product measurable: for each rational the map is product measurable, so joint measurability of makes each difference quotient measurable, and the limsup is the infimum over positive integers of the countable suprema over rational . Its indicator is integrable since the product space has total measure . For every fixed deterministic the shifted process is again a standard Brownian motion by [F3], so the divergence recorded in [step 1.4] holds for that : along a sequence the squared difference quotient is unbounded. Since the path is continuous, the function is finite-valued and continuous on , so for every its supremum over the dense subset equals its supremum over all of , the limsup along rational coincides with the limsup along real , and the latter is almost surely; hence for every and not merely for the rational ones. Therefore [F5] gives and hence almost surely.
Intersecting the events of [step 2.1] over the countably many rational and rational pairs , and using [step 1.1] to pass from a rational to every real with , we obtain: almost surely for every and every compact interval with rational endpoints, hence by containment for every nondegenerate compact interval.
First intersect the events from step 2.4 over all rational . On the resulting probability-one event the set of at which [step 2.3] would hold has measure zero, so a continuous path with cannot be a Brownian path: almost surely for every rational interval and hence every nondegenerate compact interval in : it contains a nondegenerate rational subinterval, and any partition of the latter extends to a partition of the former by adjoining the two outer endpoints; all extra terms are nonnegative.
Combining [step 3.1], [step 2.2] and [step 3.2] on the intersection of the countably many probability-one events, almost surely for all and for all , simultaneously on every nondegenerate compact interval; the exponent case is the infinite total variation of the path, and the value is handled by the accumulated-variation argument rather than by the dyadic sums, which are finite.
The boundary cases are covered: is required by the statement, so no fractional exponents below one occur; the interval is nondegenerate and compact, and rational endpoints suffice by [F6]; the two-variation is a supremum over all partitions and is deliberately distinguished from the dyadic quadratic sums, which converge almost surely to for each fixed interval by step 1.4; the monotonicity of [step 1.1] transfers between exponents using the finite oscillation of a continuous function on a compact interval; AC is declared exactly at the monotone-differentiability interface [F4], and AC is the ambient assumption of [F6].
Source notes
Lawler, Section 2.8, computes the finite dyadic quadratic variation and infinite total variation of Brownian paths; the -variation threshold for follows by interpolating between the total variation (), the supremal two-variation () and the subcritical Hölder regularity (). Durrett's law of the iterated logarithm at zero, transported along the shifted increments, is what rules out finite supremal two-variation, by Fubini at every fixed real time, contradicting the finite derivative of accumulated variation at almost every time. Rational times alone would not yield that contradiction.
Depends on
- Partition of $[a,b]$ as a finite strictly increasing list $a = t_0 < t_1 < \dots < t_n = b$, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions
- Heine-Cantor in $\mathbb{R}$: a continuous real function on a compact subset of $\mathbb{R}$ is uniformly continuous, proved $\mathbb{R}$-natively from sequential compactness
- Quadratic variation along a partition sequence
- Brownian motion has a jointly measurable continuous version
- Brownian motion
- Brownian paths are locally Holder below one half
- Brownian quadratic variation on dyadic partitions
- Brownian paths have infinite total variation
- Brownian law of the iterated logarithm at zero
- A monotone function is differentiable almost everywhere by the rising-sun route
- Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
- The rationals embed densely in the reals
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
88 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gregory F. Lawler, Stochastic Calculus: An Introduction with Applications, Section 2.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Rick Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, fifth edition, Theorem 8.5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)