How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
LIL rules out a square-root-time bound
Example
Let be a standard Brownian motion. Almost surely there is no finite random constant and no random such that Thus the square-root bound that holds in expectation for a single time is false as a pathwise statement near the origin.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and a standard Brownian motion .
Almost surely and the corresponding limit inferior is . Brownian law of the iterated logarithm at zero
AC is assumed explicitly in this example. The Axiom of Choice
Verification
On the probability-one event of [F1], combining the two limit statements gives , so there are with .
For such a sequence ; hence for every finite constant there exist with , whatever is prescribed, which is exactly the failure of the displayed bound for a finite random and random .
The cases are covered: only is quantified, so the normalizer is defined and positive for small ; the constant is allowed to be random and finite, and the argument produces, on the given outcome, arbitrarily small times violating any fixed finite value; and AC enters only through [F2].
Source notes
The law of the iterated logarithm at zero does more than fail to provide a one-half modulus: it exhibits a sequence of times along which diverges. Durrett's Theorem 8.5.1, transported to zero, is the source of that sequence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Rick Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, fifth edition, Theorem 8.5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)