Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Brownian quadratic variation on dyadic partitions

Statement

Let B be a standard Brownian motion Brownian motion and fix T>0. For n1 let πn be the dyadic partition of [0,T] with points kT/2n, k=0,,2n, and let Qn:=k=12n(BkT/2nB(k1)T/2n)2=[B]Tπn in the notation of Quadratic variation along a partition sequence. Then QnT in L2 and almost surely as n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a standard Brownian motion B, T>0, and the dyadic partitions πn above with h=T/2n.

[F1]

The increments of B over disjoint intervals are independent with laws N(0,h) for interval length h. Brownian motion

[F2]

If XtXs has law N(0,ts) then EXtXs2m=cmtsm with cm=(2m1)!!; in particular E(ΔB)2=h and E(ΔB)4=3h2 for an increment of length h. Gaussian even moments for Brownian increments

[F3]

Chebyshev: P(XEXλ)Var(X)/λ2 for a square-integrable real X and λ>0. Chebyshev's inequality for random variables

[F4]

First Borel-Cantelli: if nP(Gn)< then almost surely only finitely many Gn occur. First Borel-Cantelli lemma for events

[F5]

[B]Tπn denotes the terminal quadratic sum along the named partition sequence πn, whose mesh T/2n tends to zero. Quadratic variation along a partition sequence

[F6]

AC is the ambient assumption of the Brownian and normal-law interfaces. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Writing Δk:=BkhB(k1)h for k=1,,2n, [F1] and [F2] give EΔk2=h and EΔk4=3h2, so the centered variables Yk:=Δk2h satisfy EYk=0 and Var(Yk)=EΔk4(EΔk2)2=3h2h2=2h2.

F1F2
2.1

QnT=k=12nYk has mean 0, and [F1] makes the Yk independent, so Var(QnT)=kVar(Yk)=2n2(T/2n)2=2T2/2n; hence E(QnT)2=2T2/2n0 and QnT in L2.

step 1.1F1
3.1

For every ε>0, [F3] gives P(QnTε)Var(QnT)/ε2=2T2/(2nε2), which is summable in n; applying [F4] to Gn={QnT1m} for each m1 and intersecting the resulting probability-one events over m shows that almost surely QnT.

step 2.1F3F4
4.1

The degeneracies are covered: T>0 is required, so h>0 and the sums are nonempty with 2n2 terms; the partition sequence is the one named in [F5], with mesh T/2n0 and with consecutive refinements πnπn+1, so no ambiguity of convention arises at t=T, where the step and partial-increment conventions coincide by Quadratic variation along a partition sequence; and AC enters only through [F6].

step 2.1step 3.1F5F6given

Source notes

Lawler, Theorems 2.8.1 and 2.8.2, proves the mean-square convergence of the dyadic quadratic sums and their almost-sure convergence along meshes whose sizes are summable (here T/2n). The computation above is the direct one: the second and fourth Gaussian moments of the increments give Var(QnT)=2T2/2n, Chebyshev gives summable error probabilities, and Borel-Cantelli upgrades to almost-sure convergence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources