How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Brownian quadratic variation on dyadic partitions
Statement
Let be a standard Brownian motion Brownian motion and fix . For let be the dyadic partition of with points , , and let in the notation of Quadratic variation along a partition sequence. Then in and almost surely as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a standard Brownian motion , , and the dyadic partitions above with .
The increments of over disjoint intervals are independent with laws for interval length . Brownian motion
If has law then with ; in particular and for an increment of length . Gaussian even moments for Brownian increments
Chebyshev: for a square-integrable real and . Chebyshev's inequality for random variables
First Borel-Cantelli: if then almost surely only finitely many occur. First Borel-Cantelli lemma for events
denotes the terminal quadratic sum along the named partition sequence , whose mesh tends to zero. Quadratic variation along a partition sequence
AC is the ambient assumption of the Brownian and normal-law interfaces. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
Writing for , [F1] and [F2] give and , so the centered variables satisfy and .
has mean , and [F1] makes the independent, so ; hence and in .
For every , [F3] gives , which is summable in ; applying [F4] to for each and intersecting the resulting probability-one events over shows that almost surely .
The degeneracies are covered: is required, so and the sums are nonempty with terms; the partition sequence is the one named in [F5], with mesh and with consecutive refinements , so no ambiguity of convention arises at , where the step and partial-increment conventions coincide by Quadratic variation along a partition sequence; and AC enters only through [F6].
Source notes
Lawler, Theorems 2.8.1 and 2.8.2, proves the mean-square convergence of the dyadic quadratic sums and their almost-sure convergence along meshes whose sizes are summable (here ). The computation above is the direct one: the second and fourth Gaussian moments of the increments give , Chebyshev gives summable error probabilities, and Borel-Cantelli upgrades to almost-sure convergence.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gregory F. Lawler, Stochastic Calculus: An Introduction with Applications, Theorems 2.8.1-2.8.2 (standard reference, not scraped)