Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Logarithm of geometric Brownian motion

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the standing hypothesis (H) of Elementary predictable Brownian integrands. Equip B with its usual augmented filtration and replace it on the F0-null event outside a fixed measurable probability-one event of continuous paths and zero start by the zero path; write B^ for this everywhere-continuous adapted version. Let x>0, let μ and σ be real and define Xt:=xexp((μσ22)t+σB^t),t0. Then X is a positive continuous Brownian Ito process with dXt=μXtdt+σXtdBt,dlogXt=(μσ22)dt+σdBt, both up to indistinguishability. No existence theorem for stochastic differential equations is asserted: the process X is defined by the displayed formula.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, (H), a standard Brownian motion B under the usual conditions, its normalized version B^, reals x>0,μ,σ, and a finite horizon T>0. Natural and usual augmented Brownian filtrations

[F1]

Ito formula and class structure. Everywhere-continuous adapted processes are predictable and progressive. The elementary integral of 1 equals BtB0, hence B^ has the class decomposition with drift 0 and diffusion 1 up to indistinguishability. Adapted continuous processes are progressively measurable Ito integral of an elementary predictable process For gC1,2([0,)×R) and X a continuous Brownian Ito process with drift b and diffusion coefficient ς, dg(t,Xt)=(tg+bxg+12ς2x2g)(t,Xt)dt+ςtxg(t,Xt)dBt up to indistinguishability; B itself is a class process with drift 0 and diffusion coefficient 1. One-dimensional Ito formula Continuous Brownian Ito processes Brownian motion

[F2]

Positivity and explicit bounds. Xt>0 for every (t,ω). On [0,T], uniform continuity of the path B^(ω) and a finite mesh show directly that KT(ω):=supsTB^s(ω)<. Hence xeμσ2/2TσKTXsxeμσ2/2T+σKT,sT. No extreme-value assertion for X is needed. Continuity of f:AR at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with limxcf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point Heine-Cantor in R: a continuous real function on a compact subset of R is uniformly continuous, proved R-natively from sequential compactness

[F3]

AC bookkeeping. Full AC covers the inherited Brownian, Ito, conditional-expectation and completeness interfaces. No solution or localization sequence is selected in the logarithmic calculation. The Axiom of Choice

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

First identity: apply [F1] to g(t,y)=xexp((μσ2/2)t+σy) along B^, which is indistinguishable from B and has drift 0 and diffusion 1. Then tg=(μσ2/2)g, yg=σg and yy2g=σ2g, so dXt=μXtdt+σXtdBt up to indistinguishability. Positivity and continuity hold everywhere by the explicit definition. The composition defining X is adapted, so [F1] also makes X, μX and σX progressive and predictable. If CT is the upper bound in [F2], then 0TμXsdsμTCT and 0T(σXs)2dsσ2TCT2 on every path. Together with X0=x and the displayed decomposition these verify the Ito-class assertion explicitly.

F1F2given
2.1

Second identity: because X was defined by a positive exponential, taking the ordinary logarithm gives the everywhere pathwise identity logXt=logx+(μσ2/2)t+σB^t. Since B^ and B are indistinguishable, this is exactly dlogXt=(μσ2/2)dt+σdBt up to indistinguishability. The explicit bounds of [F2] also verify directly that X stays in a compact subinterval of (0,) and its logarithm is bounded on every finite horizon; no localization or SDE existence theorem is being smuggled into the argument.

F2step 1.1
3.1

Boundary and consistency cases: at t=0 the identities read X0=x and logX0=logx; for σ=0 the formulas reduce to the deterministic exponential and its logarithm; for μ=0 the drift of logX is σ2/2; and x>0 is required for the logarithm. The formulas concern the explicitly defined process, not existence for an SDE, and AC enters only through [F3].

F1F2F3step 2.1

Source notes

Lawler, Section 3.3, computes geometric Brownian motion by Ito's formula. Here the first differential follows from Ito's formula and the logarithmic identity is read directly from the defining positive exponential, with the explicit finite-horizon bounds recording why no domain problem is hidden.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources