Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22 rests on later material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Periodic derivative and its unitary translation group

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Use the complex Hilbert space H=L2((0,1);C) with first-variable-linear inner product. Let D(P)={fH:f has an AC[0,1] representative with fL2(0,1), f(0)=f(1)},Pf=if. Complex absolute continuity is read componentwise; the continuous representative is unique, so endpoint values are unambiguous. Then P is self-adjoint, and V(t)f(x)=f((x+t)mod1),tR, defines a strongly continuous unitary group on equivalence classes. Its infinitesimal generator is G=iP, with D(G)=D(P); equivalently V(t)=eitP. The self-adjoint Stone operator is P, whereas the derivative generator is iP.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, H and P as in the Example.

[A1]

The minimal derivative operator T with both endpoint values zero is densely defined on H. Its domain lies in D(P). Its counterexample also proves uniqueness of the absolutely continuous representative in each L2 class and the componentwise complex integration-by-parts formula fg=[fg]01fg. In particular for f in D(T), Tf,g=+ifg for absolutely continuous g with derivative in L2. A symmetric closed operator that is not self-adjoint Absolute continuity on a compact interval Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions

[A2]

A densely defined symmetric operator with both ranges ran(P+i)=ran(P-i)=H is self-adjoint. A self-adjoint operator has no proper symmetric extension. The latter is a maximality statement about a self-adjoint smaller operator, not about an arbitrary symmetric restriction of a self-adjoint operator. Range criterion for self-adjointness Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators

[A3]

Under full AC, Stone's theorem identifies a strongly continuous unitary group with e^{itS} for a unique self-adjoint S; its derivative generator G has D(G)=D(S) and G=iS. Stone's theorem: unitary groups and self-adjoint generators Infinitesimal generator of a unitary group Strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group

[A4]

An L1 indefinite integral is absolutely continuous and has the integrand as derivative almost everywhere; an absolutely continuous function equals its initial value plus the integral of its derivative. These statements apply componentwise to complex functions. The indefinite integral of an L1 function is absolutely continuous The indefinite integral of an L1 function is differentiable almost everywhere Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions

[A5]

The complex L2 pairing is first-variable-linear and satisfies Cauchy--Schwarz. Changes of variable by translations preserve Lebesgue integrals. Tonelli interchanges nonnegative integrals. A continuous function on a compact real interval is uniformly continuous. The complex L2 pairing is well-defined and satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product Heine-Cantor in R: a continuous real function on a compact subset of R is uniformly continuous, proved R-natively from sequential compactness

[A6]

Full AC is assumed for Stone's theorem and supplies the Countable Choice and Dependent Choice required by the calculus, density, range and compactness interfaces. The Axiom of Choice

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The domain is linear and its representatives and derivatives are well defined by [A1]. Since D(T) is dense and contained in D(P), P is densely defined. For periodic f,g in D(P), integration by parts and the first-variable convention give Pf,g=i[fg]01+i01fg=i01fg=f,Pg. Periodicity of both endpoints cancels the boundary term. Thus P is symmetric.

A1A5given
1.2

For real t let r be its representative in [0,1) modulo integers. Splitting the x integral at 1-r and translating on the two intervals gives 01f((x+r)mod1)2dx=r1f(y)2dy+0rf(y)2dy=f22. Endpoints have measure zero. The same computation for indicators of null sets proves independence of the measurable representative; periodic extension from a Lebesgue-measurable representative is measurable, and translations preserve null modifications. V(t) is linear, V(0)=I and V(s)V(t)=V(s+t) on classes by addition modulo 1. Its inverse is V(-t), so it is unitary.

A5given
2.1

Let ε{1,1} and gH. Cauchy--Schwarz gives gL1(0,1). Put cε=ieεeε101eεsg(s)ds,u(x)=eεx(cε+i0xeεsg(s)ds). The denominator is nonzero for either sign. By [A4], u is absolutely continuous and u=εu+ig almost everywhere. For completeness, the product with the smooth exponential is absolutely continuous: the integral factor is bounded and absolutely continuous, the exponential is bounded with bounded derivative, and the increment product formula verifies the defining AC estimates. Thus u is bounded, belongs to L2, and u' belongs to L2. The displayed constant gives u(1)=u(0)=cε. Finally iu+εiu=g, so (P+εi)u=g. Both shifts are onto; [A2] and step 1.1 make P self-adjoint.

A2A4A5step 1.1
2.2

Every f in D(T) has a continuous periodic extension. Its restriction to [-1,2] is uniformly continuous by [A5]; hence V(t)ff2supx[0,1]f(x+t)f(x)0 as t tends to zero through either sign. Given arbitrary f in H and eta>0 choose g in D(T) with fg2<η by [A1]. Isometry gives V(t)ff22η+V(t)gg2. First send t to zero and then eta to zero. The group law and isometry transfer continuity to every real time. Thus V is a strongly continuous unitary group.

A1A3A5step 1.2
3.1

For f in D(P), its periodic extension is absolutely continuous on every compact interval: finitely many translates of the AC representative join with matching endpoint values, and the AC estimates combine across finitely many joins. Its a.e. derivative is the periodic extension of f'. By [A4], for positive or negative t, V(t)fftf=1t0t(V(s)ff)ds in the scalar pointwise integral sense for almost every x. Let J_t be the interval between 0 and t. Cauchy--Schwarz in s and Tonelli yield V(t)fftf221tJtV(s)ff22dssupstV(s)ff220, by step 2.2 applied to the L2 class f'. For joint measurability use the explicit periodic Borel representative of f' obtained as the finite limit of (n+1)(f(x+1/(n+1))f(x)), assigning zero where no finite limit exists. Each difference quotient is continuous, its finite-convergence set is Borel by the countable Cauchy criterion, and the limit equals f' wherever f is differentiable. Composition with addition modulo 1 is jointly Borel. Since the representative differs from f' only on a null set, translation invariance and Tonelli leave the displayed estimates unchanged. Consequently D(P) is contained in D(G) and Gf=f'=iPf.

A3A4A5step 1.2step 2.2
4.1

By [A3], S=-iG is self-adjoint. Step 3.1 gives P contained in S, with equal values on D(P). P is itself self-adjoint by step 2.1, so [A2]'s maximality applies to P and its symmetric extension S, and gives P=S. Equivalently the adjoint inclusions read PS=SP=P. Thus D(G)=D(P), G=iP and Stone's uniqueness gives V(t)=eitP.

A2A3step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

The zero function and every constant function are in D(P); constants are fixed by V and annihilated by P and G. V(0)=I, integer translations are I, and negative times are included in both the group and derivative calculations. No division by t occurs at t=0, only a two-sided limit, and neither e1 nor e11 vanishes. Endpoint values belong to the unique AC representative, while the translation action belongs to L2 classes. Full AC has the uses in [A6]; the two resolvent solutions and the translation are explicit.

A1A6step 2.1step 1.2step 3.1step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

95 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources