Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Brownian-filtration martingale representation

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let B be a standard Brownian motion with raw natural filtration (Ft0) and usual augmentation (Ft) Natural and usual augmented Brownian filtrations.

  1. Fixed-horizon L2 representation. For every T>0 and every ZL2(FT) there is a predictable process H on [0,T] with E0THs2ds< such that Z=EZ+0THsdBsalmost surely, and then E[ZFt]=EZ+0tHsdBs for every tT, up to indistinguishability of the right-hand continuous version. H is unique modulo (dtP)-null sets on [0,T].
  2. Cadlag local martingales. Every local martingale M relative to (Ft) whose paths are right-continuous with left limits on one event of probability one satisfies, up to indistinguishability, Mt=M0+0tHsdBs,t0, for a predictable process H that is locally square-integrable, 0tHs2ds< almost surely for every t. If M0+HdB=M0+KdB up to indistinguishability for two such predictable integrands, then H=K (dtP)-almost everywhere on [0,t] for every t. In particular such an M has a continuous version.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a standard Brownian motion B with raw natural filtration (Ft0) and usual augmentation (Ft), a horizon T>0, and (for clause 2) a local martingale M with cadlag paths and localizing sequence (τn).

[F1]

Integral and isometry interfaces. For predictable H with finite energy E0TH2ds, the integral 0THdB is an L2(P) class, the map H0THdB is an isometry with E(0THdB)2=E0TH2ds, its image in L2(P) is a closed subspace, and it takes values in the mean-zero subspace. For locally square-integrable H the localized integral exists and is unique up to indistinguishability, and the stopping identity identifies stopped integrals with integrals of H1[0,σ]. Ito isometry and linearity in predictable L2 Localized Ito integral Stopping an Ito integral The Ito integral process has a continuous martingale version Locally square-integrable predictable Brownian integrands Elementary predictable Brownian integrands Ito integral for square-integrable predictable processes

[F2]

One-dimensional Ito formula for deterministic step integrals. If h=jλj1(tj1,tj] is a deterministic step function, q(t)=0th2ds and Xt=0thdB, apply the one-dimensional Ito formula separately on each deterministic interval, where q(t)=ht2 is constant, to eq(t)/2cosx and eq(t)/2sinx, and concatenate the identities at the endpoints. This gives eq(t)/2cosXt1=0teq(s)/2sinXshsdBs, eq(t)/2sinXt=0teq(s)/2cosXshsdBs. Choose an everywhere continuous adapted version of X by setting it to zero on its fixed exceptional F0-null event. The displayed integrands are predictable and their expected energies are at most eq(T)q(T). Thus both real variables on the left belong to the real range RT of terminal integrals. No globally C1 claim is made for the piecewise linear function q. One-dimensional Ito formula Ito integral of an elementary predictable process Elementary predictable Brownian integrands

[F3]

Conditional expectation and martingale closure. For integrable Y and AFt one has E[1AYFt]=1AE[YFt] and E[1AE[YFt]]=E[1AY]; if two martingales agree at T almost surely and are a.s. continuous, they agree at every tT up to indistinguishability; and for a bounded martingale N the identity Nt=E[NTFt] is the martingale property itself. Conditional expectation as an ae class Tower property of conditional expectation Continuous-time adapted processes and martingales Process law, modification, and indistinguishability

[F4]

Completion and the right-continuous filtration. Every set in Fu0 differs from a raw Fu0-set by a subset of a null set; consequently every σ(Fu0N)-measurable integrable random variable is almost surely equal to an Fu0-measurable one, and the usual augmentation satisfies Ft=u>tFu=u>tσ(Fu0N), an intersection that may be computed over the countable set u=t+1/m. Natural and usual augmented Brownian filtrations Conditional expectation as an ae class Dominated convergence

[F5]

Fourier uniqueness and pi-lambda. Finite Borel measures on Rn with equal Fourier transforms are equal, and a pi-system generating a sigma-algebra determines it by the Dynkin pi-lambda theorem, in the form that a finite signed measure vanishing on a generating pi-system vanishes on the generated sigma-algebra. Uniqueness of finite Borel measures from their Fourier transforms Dynkin's pi-lambda theorem Standard normal and normal laws

[F6]

Closed subspaces of L2. A closed linear subspace of L2(P) with trivial orthogonal complement is all of L2(P). A closed L2 subspace with trivial orthogonal complement fills L2 Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1p

[F7]

Almost-sure subsequences. Convergence in probability yields an almost-surely convergent subsequence, and a sequence converging uniformly in probability along a subsequence may be identified with its continuous limit up to indistinguishability. An almost-surely convergent subsequence from convergence in probability Convergence in probability Process law, modification, and indistinguishability

[F8]

AC bookkeeping. Full AC supplies the inherited completeness and conditional-expectation interfaces and the countable selections of integrand representatives, continuous versions and subsequences below. Grids and energy thresholds are explicit; the selected integrands are not asserted to be canonical. The Axiom of Choice AC supplies countable selections and prescribed serial paths

[F9]

Raw past and future. For every T0, B~h=BT+hBT is standard Brownian motion independent of FT0. Independence follows first for finite collections of increments from the Brownian law, then for the generated sigma-algebras by pi-lambda. Moreover FT+h0=FT0σ(B~u:0uh), directly from the coordinate identities. These are sigma-algebra statements, requiring no path-space isomorphism. Brownian motion Dynkin's pi-lambda theorem

[F10]

Downward convergence of conditional expectations. If (Gm) is a decreasing sequence of sigma-algebras with intersection G and X is integrable, then E[XGm]E[XG] almost surely and in L1. Levy downward convergence of conditional expectations

[F11]

Blumenthal's zero-one law. For a standard Brownian motion W, every event of the germ sigma-algebra F0+0=u>0σ(Ws:su) of its raw filtration has probability 0 or 1. Blumenthal's zero-one law The Brownian germ sigma-algebra at zero

[F12]

Conditional contraction and bounded stopping ingredients. Conditional expectation is a contraction on real L2. For a discrete integrable martingale, bounded optional sampling identifies its stopped-grid values with conditional expectations of its final value. Conditional expectations of one fixed L1 variable form a uniformly integrable family; uniform integrability and convergence in probability give L1 convergence. Conditional lp contraction Optional sampling for bounded stopping times Uniform integrability of conditional expectations of one variable Uniform integrability plus convergence in probability implies L1 convergence

[F13]

Product-null sections. Tonelli for the sigma-finite product of time Lebesgue measure and probability shows that product-almost-everywhere agreement of predictable integrands on a stochastic interval gives time-almost-everywhere agreement there on a measurable probability-one event. Countably many such events and integer horizons may be intersected. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Product density on raw sigma-algebras. Fix T0, let H=FT0 and Gm=σ(B~h:0h1/m). Finite sums of bounded products UV, with U measurable in H and V in G1, are dense in L2(HG1). Indeed, their closed linear span contains 1AD for AH,DG1. Sets whose indicators belong to the span form a Dynkin class: complements use the constant 1, and disjoint countable unions follow by L2 convergence of their finite indicator sums. The intersections form a generating pi-system. Pi-lambda therefore supplies all measurable indicators; simple approximation and truncation give density.

F5F6F9
1.2

Bounded stopping for continuous integrable martingales. Let L be such a martingale and let ρ be a bounded stopping time. For fixed s<t choose K>t exceeding its bound and finite deterministic grids of [0,K] containing s,t with mesh tending to zero. Round ρ upward to a grid stopping time ηj. The sampled process stopped at ηj is a discrete martingale: each increment is an original martingale increment multiplied by the past-measurable indicator that stopping has not yet occurred. Thus, for AFs, E[1ALtηj]=E[1ALsηj]. Bounded optional sampling on the same grid writes each of these stopped values as a conditional expectation of the fixed variable LK. They form a uniformly integrable family by [F12]. Continuity gives convergence almost surely to Ltρ and Lsρ, hence convergence in L1. Passing to the limit proves the martingale test. For each t, adaptation of Ltρ follows by rounding tρ upward on grids of [0,t] and taking the continuous limit; all grid values and events are Ft-measurable. Thus Lρ is a continuous integrable martingale.

F3F12
1.3

Local integrand uniqueness, proved before the next patch. If two local integrals HB,KB agree up to a stopping time τ, stop also at T and at level N of the combined energy 0t(H2+K2)ds, with time cap N. These are stopping times by the energy construction in [F1] (apply it to the predictable square root of H2+K2). Both stopped integrands have finite expected energy. The stopping identity and finite-energy linearity make the terminal integral of their stopped difference zero. Isometry gives E0TτσN(HsKs)2ds=0. The levels exhaust each finite horizon almost surely; nonnegative convergence gives agreement dtP-almost everywhere before Tτ. This proves the needed uniqueness independently of the representation to be constructed.

F1
2.1

Removal of the right germ, before using Brownian integration in the augmented filtration. For bounded U,V as in step 1.1, testing on AD, AH,DGm, and using independence gives E[UVHGm]=UE[VGm]. The test extends to the generated sigma-algebra by pi-lambda. Downward convergence and Blumenthal's law give E[VGm]EV almost surely; the uniform bound yields L2 convergence. Thus the displayed conditional expectation tends to UEV=E[UVH]. Density from step 1.1 and the L2 contraction extend this to every YL2(HG1). If ZL2(FT), completion supplies a raw version in each HGm. Use the m=1 version in this convergence: every conditional expectation on the left is Z, so Z=E[ZFT0] almost surely. In particular every FT event agrees almost surely with a raw past event. The Brownian increment law and independence of the raw past therefore also hold for FT. Since T was arbitrary, B is Brownian relative to the usual filtration, as required by [F1] and [F2]. This argument uses only raw Brownian laws and conditional expectation, not martingale representation.

F4F9F10F11F12step 1.1
3.1

The range of terminal integrals: let RT:={0THdB:H predictable,E0TH2ds<}L2(P). By [F1], RT is a closed linear subspace contained in the mean-zero subspace, and each of its elements is FT-measurable because elementary terminal integrals are finite combinations of Brownian increments and the L2 limit of FT-measurable random variables is FT-measurable; hence RT{ZL2(FT):EZ=0}.

F1F3step 2.1
4.1

Orthogonality forces vanishing, step one: let ZL2(FT) with EZ=0 and ZRT. For every deterministic step function h, [F2] puts eq(T)/2cosXT1 and eq(T)/2sinXT in RT. Orthogonality and EZ=0 therefore give E[ZcosXT]=E[ZsinXT]=0, hence E[Zexp(ijλj(BtjBtj1))]=0 for all real coefficients.

F1F2step 3.1
5.1

Cylinder Fourier transforms. Insert t0=0 into any finite list of positive times t1<<tnT. Put μk=j=knλj; since B0=0 almost surely, jλjBtj=kμk(BtkBtk1) almost surely. A coordinate at time zero contributes only an almost surely zero term. Push the two finite positive measures Z+dP and ZdP forward by the coordinate vector. They are finite because ZL2(P)L1(P). Step 4.1 gives identical Fourier transforms, so [F5] makes the pushforwards equal. Hence AZdP=0 for every Brownian cylinder rectangle with times at most T.

F5step 4.1
6.1

Step three, pi-lambda: the cylinder rectangles with all times T form a pi-system generating σ(Bs:sT)=FT0, and AAZdP is a finite signed measure vanishing there; the class of sets on which it vanishes is closed under complements, proper differences and increasing countable unions (continuity from below), so by the Dynkin pi-lambda theorem [F5] it vanishes on all of FT0. Hence E[ZFT0]=0 almost surely.

F5step 5.1
7.1

Completion and the right germ. Step 2.1 applies to this ZL2(FT) and gives Z=E[ZFT0]. Step 6.1 makes the latter zero. Thus every mean-zero Z orthogonal to RT vanishes.

step 2.1step 6.1
8.1

Conclusion of the L2 stage. Set S=RT+span{1} in the full real space L2(FT). This subspace is closed: if rk+ckY in L2, continuity of expectation gives ckEY, and then rkYEYRT. A vector orthogonal to S has mean zero and is orthogonal to RT, hence vanishes by step 7.1. Apply [F6] on the probability space with sigma-algebra FT to obtain S=L2(FT). Thus ZEZ=0THdB for a finite-energy predictable H. The continuous integral martingale satisfies EZ+0tHdB=E[ZFt] for each tT. This assigns the conditional expectations their continuous version; continuous versions agree on rational times and at T, hence everywhere on a common full event. The isometry gives uniqueness of H modulo dtP.

F1F3F6step 7.1
9.1

Continuity before level stopping. Let N be a cadlag integrable martingale and fix T>0. Truncate Z=NT to Z(r)=(r)(Zr). Step 8.1 gives continuous martingales Yt(r)=E[Z(r)Ft]. At every time of the countable set D=(Q[0,T]){T}, Yq(r)NqE[Z(r)ZFq]. Apply the discrete Doob L1 inequality to this nonnegative conditional-expectation martingale on increasing finite subsets of D containing 0,T. Their maxima increase to the supremum over D. On the common measurable full event of continuity of the Y(r) and cadlag paths of N, right continuity and inclusion of T identify this with the supremum over [0,T]. Therefore εP(sup0tTYt(r)Nt>ε)EZ(r)Z0. Here the supremum is understood as its measurable countable-set version, agreeing with the path supremum on that full event. A subsequence converges uniformly almost surely by [F7]; thus N itself has continuous paths on a measurable full event and is indistinguishable from a continuous version. Intersect these events over integer T. Their complement is an ambient null event in F0; replacing the process there by zero gives an everywhere continuous adapted version. Absolute value and powers of a martingale are submartingales Doob L1 maximal inequality

F3F4F7F8step 8.1
10.1

Continuity of the local martingale. By its definition, N(n)=MτnM0 is a cadlag integrable martingale starting at zero. Step 9.1 supplies an everywhere continuous adapted version C(n) indistinguishable from it. Intersect their agreement events, the event of cadlag paths of M, and the event τn, obtaining a measurable full event GF0. On G, C(n) agrees with MM0 up to τn; consequently MM0 is continuous on every finite interval. Define Ct=MtM0 on G and Ct=0 outside G. Then C is everywhere continuous and adapted, starts at zero, and is indistinguishable from MM0. Each Cτn remains an integrable martingale. We use this centered process below; no integrability of M0 was assumed or needed.

F3F4step 9.1given
11.1

Bounded continuous pieces. For fixed n, set C(n)=Cτn and ρn,m=inf{t0:Ct(n)m}m. For t<m, its stopping event is {supu[0,t]Cu(n)m}, measurable using rational times and t; compactness and continuity ensure the supremum is attained. For tm the event is all of Ω. Since C0(n)=0, continuity gives (C(n))ρn,mm and ρn,m pathwise. Step 1.2 makes these bounded processes martingales. On each positive integer horizon T, their terminal variables have mean zero and lie in L2, so step 8.1 represents the entire processes by finite-energy predictable integrands. Their integral versions agree at all times by [F3], and isometry makes the integrands agree on overlaps. Choose the countably many representatives using [F8] and patch along deterministic unit intervals. This gives predictable H(n,m) of finite expected energy on every finite horizon representing (C(n))ρn,m.

F1F3F8step 8.1step 10.1step 1.2
12.1

Agreement on overlaps: if ρρ and the bounded stopped martingales have representations H,H on [0,T], then H1[0,ρ]=H1[0,ρ] (dtP)-a.e. Indeed, stopping the two representations at ρ gives the same continuous process, so 0T(HH)1[0,ρ]dB=0; the isometry then gives E0T(HH)21[0,ρ]ds=0.

F1step 11.1
13.1

Passing first in m. For fixed n, step 12.1 gives agreement of the integrands on the increasing stochastic intervals [0,ρn,m]. Put H(n)=H(n,1)1[0,ρn,1]+m2H(n,m)1(ρn,m1,ρn,m]. The indicators are predictable; the intervals are disjoint, so the sum is a pointwise limit of predictable finite sums with at most one nonzero summand. By [F13] and countable intersection, on one full event the patch agrees time-almost everywhere with H(n,m) before ρn,m for every m and integer horizon. Each path-horizon eventually lies there, and H(n,m) has finite energy almost surely, so H(n) has locally finite energy. Moreover its truncation at ρn,m has finite expected energy on each horizon and its integral equals (C(n))ρn,m. The localizing-sequence independence in [F1] therefore gives H(n)B=C(n) up to indistinguishability.

F1F13step 11.1step 12.1
14.1

Passing in n. For nn, (C(n))τn=C(n). Step 1.3 makes H(n) and H(n) agree almost everywhere before τn. Define H=H(1)1[0,τ1]+n2H(n)1(τn1,τn]. As in step 13.1 this is predictable; [F13] and τn show its energy is finite almost surely on every finite horizon. Before τn it agrees with H(n) in product measure. To compare their integrals, stop additionally at the combined-energy levels used in step 1.3; the isometry and stopping identity give equality there, and exhaustion gives (HB)τn=C(n). Finally τn and countable intersection of the indistinguishability events yield HB=C. Consequently M=M0+HB up to indistinguishability.

F1F13step 10.1step 13.1step 1.3
15.1

Uniqueness in clause 2 follows from step 1.3 with τ=, on every finite horizon. Its continuous integral version and step 14.1 give the asserted continuity.

step 1.3step 14.1
16.1

Boundary and choice cases. At T=0, step 2.1 gives that every F0 event agrees almost surely with a σ(B0) event. Since B0=0 almost surely, every such event has probability zero or one, and every real L2(F0) variable is almost surely constant (apply this to its rational sublevel sets). The integral over the empty time interval is zero. Bounded Brownian cylinder variables satisfy clause 1 because they lie in L2(FT); no explicit formula for their integrands is asserted. For M=B the integrand is 1, and for a constant process it is 0. Clause 2 excludes nonzero jumps on a full event. Full AC covers all inherited interfaces and the countably many representative and integrand choices; these selections need not be canonical.

F1F8step 2.1step 8.1step 14.1

Source notes

Van der Vaart, Theorem 6.6 and its complete proof, printed pp. 122–124 (PDF pp. 127–129), support the closed-range/Fourier approach and the order: first prove continuity by terminal truncations and a maximal inequality, then localize and patch integrands. The raw-to-usual filtration argument, real full-L2 application, bounded stopping proof and product-null patching above explicitly discharge the local interfaces used here. Lawler Section 5.7 is retained as a statement reference, not as the source of a continuous-time proof.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

189 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources