Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ito isometry and linearity in predictable L2

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the standing hypothesis (H) of Elementary predictable Brownian integrands. Fix T>0. For predictable H,K with finite energy E0TH2ds,E0TK2ds< the integrals 0THdB of Ito integral for square-integrable predictable processes satisfy 0T(H+K)dB=0THdB+0TKdB,0T(aH)dB=a0THdB(aR), and the identities are equalities of L2(P)-classes (almost sure equalities). Moreover the map H0THdB is an isometry, E(0THdB)2=E0TH2ds=HL2(dtP)2, it takes values in the mean-zero subspace of L2(P), and the bilinear cross identity E[(0THdB)(0TKdB)]=E0THsKsds holds for all such H,K. In particular the image of the map is a closed subspace of L2(P) isometric to the predictable L2 space of H's, and H0THdB is injective up to the (dtP)-class.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the standing hypothesis (H), T>0, finite-energy predictable H,K, elementary sequences HnH and KnK in L2(dtP), and aR.

[F1]

Hn+Kn(H+K)2HnH2+KnK20 and aHnaH2=aHnH20, so Hn+Kn and aHn are admissible approximating sequences for H+K and aH. The Lp norm descends to the quotient and makes Lp a normed space for 1p

[F2]

For elementary G one has IT(G)= the elementary sum, EIT(G)2=E0TG2, EIT(G)=0, and for elementary G,G on a common refinement E[IT(G)IT(G)]=E0TGG. Ito integral of an elementary predictable process Ito isometry for elementary integrands Cross Ito isometry Continuous-time adapted processes and martingales

[F3]

Each integral 0TGdB is the L2(P)-limit of IT(Gn) for any admissible elementary sequence, and the limit is independent of the sequence. Ito integral for square-integrable predictable processes The general Ito integral is well defined

[F4]

On the quotient space L2(P), L2-convergence implies convergence of norms and of expectations: Xn2X2XnX2 and EXnEXXnX2; and the predictable L2 space, like every L2 space, is complete. The Lp norm descends to the quotient and makes Lp a normed space for 1p Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1p

[F5]

The algebraic identities (X+Y)2(XY)2=4XY and X2Y2=(XY)(X+Y) hold for real random variables, and L2(P) is a real vector space of classes. Conditional expectation as an ae class

[F6]

AC is declared for the ambient interfaces. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For each n the elementary integrals are linear on a common refinement, IT(Hn+Kn)=IT(Hn)+IT(Kn) and IT(aHn)=aIT(Hn) identically; by [F2] the isometry EIT(G)2=E0TG2, the mean identity EIT(G)=0 for elementary G, and the cross identity hold at every index.

F2given
1.2

By [F1] the sequences Hn+Kn and aHn are admissible for H+K and aH, so [F3] gives IT(Hn+Kn)0T(H+K)dB and IT(aHn)0T(aH)dB in L2(P), as well as IT(Hn)0THdB and IT(Kn)0TKdB.

F1F3given
2.1

Letting n in the linear identities of step 1.1 and using uniqueness of L2(P)-limits, 0T(H+K)dB=0THdB+0TKdB and 0T(aH)dB=a0THdB almost surely.

F3step 1.1step 1.2
2.2

Taking the limit in the elementary isometry of step 1.1 gives E(0THdB)2=limnEIT(Hn)2=limnE0T(Hn)2=HL2(dtP)2 by [F4] applied to the L2(P)-limits and to the L2(dtP)-convergence HnH. Likewise E0THdB=limnEIT(Hn)=0, and the triangle inequality gives E0THdB0THdB2<. So the image is mean-zero and isometric.

F4step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

For the cross identity use 4XY=(X+Y)2(XY)2 with X=0THdB and Y=0TKdB: by step 2.1, 4E[XY]=E(0T(H+K)dB)2E(0T(HK)dB)2=H+K22HK22=4E0THKds by step 2.2. All terms are finite by step 2.2.

F5step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

Steps 2.1--3.1 are exactly the linearity, isometry, mean-zero and cross-identity claims; injectivity follows because 0T(HK)dB2=HKL2(dtP), and closedness of the image follows because the image of a complete space under an isometry onto it is complete, hence closed, with the target metric restricted: the domain of classes is complete by [F4], and the isometry carries its Cauchy sequences to Cauchy sequences whose limits are the images of the domain limits. AC enters only through the declared ambient interfaces [F6]; the approximating sequences are the given ones and the limits are unique.

step 2.1step 3.1F4F6given

Source notes

Lawler, Sections 3.2.2--3.2.3, proves linearity and the variance rule for the extended integral by approximation. The presentation here keeps the two descents separate: item 11 supplies well-definedness of the limit, and the elementary isometry and cross isometry of items 7 and 8 are passed to the limit through the continuity of the L2 norm and of the expectation.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources