How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cross Ito isometry
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the standing hypothesis (H) of Elementary predictable Brownian integrands. For elementary predictable integrands on and every , where the sums are the elementary integrals of the chosen representations Ito integral of an elementary predictable process. Both sides depend only on the -classes of and and are finite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the standing hypothesis (H), a horizon , elementary representations of on some partitions, their common refinement, and .
On the common refinement, , and their scalar multiples are again elementary predictable integrands with bounded coefficients measurable at the left endpoints of that refinement; the defining sums are linear there, so identically. Ito integral of an elementary predictable process Elementary predictable Brownian integrands
For every elementary predictable , is finite and is a continuous square-integrable martingale. Ito isometry for elementary integrands
The pointwise identity holds on , and the same expansion applies to the random variables . Elementary predictable Brownian integrands
AC is inherited from the elementary isometry and representation-independence interfaces. In particular, the proof of the elementary isometry uses conditional expectations, but its exported interface here is only the martingale and squared-isometry statement [F2]. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
Pass to the common refinement of the two partitions and keep the notation for the refined representations; by [F1] both and are elementary predictable integrands on that refinement, and , identically, with all quantities square-integrable.
Applying the elementary isometry [F2] to and to gives the two finite identities and .
Subtracting the second identity of step 1.2 from the first and expanding with [F3] gives , where the right-hand side is finite because and both elementary integrands have finite energy.
The left-hand side of step 2.1 equals by the algebraic expansion [F3], and is invertible in , so . Representation independence follows from Elementary Ito integrals do not depend on step representation applied to and to ; the AC bookkeeping is exactly the inherited use recorded in [F4], not an additional conditional-expectation interface asserted by this lemma.
Source notes
Van der Vaart, Lemma 5.22, records the bilinear form of the isometry as the polarized version of the squared identity. No additional source of randomness or integrability beyond the elementary isometry is used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Aad van der Vaart, Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations, Lemma 5.22 (standard reference, not scraped)